Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Quchaosheng <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: rockchip,rk805: Convert pinctrl to DT schema
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 07:53:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923075334.8DE071F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923074337.575122-1-quchaosheng000406@163.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] dt-bindings: schema validation bypass in pinmux node
--

commit 3e9f0dec3f740f3763a3ebb688af0f850b47bc2f
Author: Quchaosheng <quchaosheng000406@163.com>

    dt-bindings: mfd: rockchip,rk805: Convert pinctrl to DT schema
    
    pinctrl-rk805.txt describes the pinmux controller that is part of the
    Rockchip RK805 PMIC. The PMIC itself is already described by
    rockchip,rk805.yaml, so the pinmux part belongs there as well: the
    pinctrl node is a child of the PMIC node, not a separate device.

    Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923034245.396417-1-quchaosheng000406@163.com?part=1
    Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923062746.516666-1-quchaosheng000406@163.com?part=1

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk805.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk805.yaml
> index da2391530c16c..aafc80212c485 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk805.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rockchip,rk805.yaml
> @@ -77,6 +77,21 @@ properties:
>      description:
>        The input supply for LDO_REG3.
>  
> +  # pinctrl-bindings.txt allows the pin configuration nodes to be grandchildren
> +  # of the pin controller, and the text binding this replaces used that layout:
> +  # a "pinmux" node holding the nodes that carry "pins". The driver reaches both
> +  # layouts, because pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() parses the referenced node
> +  # and then walks its children.
> +  pinmux:
> +    type: object
> +    additionalProperties: false
> +    patternProperties:
> +      '^.+$':
> +        if:
> +          type: object
> +        then:
> +          $ref: '#/$defs/rk805-pin-config'

[Severity: Medium]
Does this catch-all regex bypass schema validation for all non-object
properties within the grouping node?

The pinmux grouping node in the schema attempts to reject invalid properties
using additionalProperties: false, but its patternProperties regex '^.+$'
combined with if: type: object without an else: false clause evaluates to true
for all non-object properties.

This defeats the strictness of the schema, allowing any arbitrary misspelled or
invalid non-object property (like typo = <1>;) to pass validation silently.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923074337.575122-1-quchaosheng000406@163.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23  7:43 [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: rockchip,rk805: Convert pinctrl to DT schema Quchaosheng
2026-09-23  7:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923075334.8DE071F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=quchaosheng000406@163.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox