Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ariana Lazar" <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 13:12:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924131251.4D59D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924-mcp47feb02_refactor-v8-3-17dc2ce3485e@microchip.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] kconfig: silent loss of driver during oldconfig upgrade due to prompt removal
--

commit 18f0a50c0487bf003f9efe902b8ee1569bb70adb
Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>

iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules

This commit refactors the MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into a core module and an
I2C-specific module to prepare for future SPI support.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig
> index b6c8873c68c54..8121a71945f63 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig
> @@ -611,9 +611,13 @@ config MCP47A1
>  	  will be called mcp47a1.
>  
>  config MCP47FEB02
> -	tristate "MCP47F(E/V)B01/02/04/08/11/12/14/18/21/22/24/28 DAC driver"
> +	tristate

[Severity: Medium]
Will this cause a silent loss of the driver for existing users upgrading
their kernel?

Because the original user-visible Kconfig symbol CONFIG_MCP47FEB02 had its
prompt removed here, the build system (e.g., when running make oldconfig)
will see it has no prompt and reset it to 'n'.

> +
> +config MCP47FEB02_I2C
> +	tristate "MCP47F(E/V)B01/02/04/08/11/12/14/18/21/22/24/28 I2C DAC driver"
>  	depends on I2C
>  	select REGMAP_I2C
> +	select MCP47FEB02

At the same time, the newly introduced CONFIG_MCP47FEB02_I2C defaults to 'n'.
This results in existing configurations losing the DAC driver entirely upon
upgrade.

Would it be better to keep the original CONFIG_MCP47FEB02 symbol as the
user-visible driver to preserve backwards compatibility, and instead introduce
a new hidden symbol like CONFIG_MCP47FEB02_CORE for the shared code?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924-mcp47feb02_refactor-v8-0-17dc2ce3485e@microchip.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 12:59 [PATCH v8 0/5] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe error on missing label Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: protect EEPROM store sequence with mutex Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 13:19   ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 13:12   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-27 18:34   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-09-27 18:41 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924131251.4D59D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox