From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ariana Lazar" <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 13:12:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924131251.4D59D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924-mcp47feb02_refactor-v8-3-17dc2ce3485e@microchip.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] kconfig: silent loss of driver during oldconfig upgrade due to prompt removal
--
commit 18f0a50c0487bf003f9efe902b8ee1569bb70adb
Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules
This commit refactors the MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into a core module and an
I2C-specific module to prepare for future SPI support.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig
> index b6c8873c68c54..8121a71945f63 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig
> @@ -611,9 +611,13 @@ config MCP47A1
> will be called mcp47a1.
>
> config MCP47FEB02
> - tristate "MCP47F(E/V)B01/02/04/08/11/12/14/18/21/22/24/28 DAC driver"
> + tristate
[Severity: Medium]
Will this cause a silent loss of the driver for existing users upgrading
their kernel?
Because the original user-visible Kconfig symbol CONFIG_MCP47FEB02 had its
prompt removed here, the build system (e.g., when running make oldconfig)
will see it has no prompt and reset it to 'n'.
> +
> +config MCP47FEB02_I2C
> + tristate "MCP47F(E/V)B01/02/04/08/11/12/14/18/21/22/24/28 I2C DAC driver"
> depends on I2C
> select REGMAP_I2C
> + select MCP47FEB02
At the same time, the newly introduced CONFIG_MCP47FEB02_I2C defaults to 'n'.
This results in existing configurations losing the DAC driver entirely upon
upgrade.
Would it be better to keep the original CONFIG_MCP47FEB02 symbol as the
user-visible driver to preserve backwards compatibility, and instead introduce
a new hidden symbol like CONFIG_MCP47FEB02_CORE for the shared code?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924-mcp47feb02_refactor-v8-0-17dc2ce3485e@microchip.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 12:59 [PATCH v8 0/5] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe error on missing label Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: protect EEPROM store sequence with mutex Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 13:19 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 13:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-27 18:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-09-24 12:59 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-09-27 18:41 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924131251.4D59D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox