From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
media-ci@linuxtv.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] media: verisilicon: Remove deprecated variant
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:04:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925090405.59B321F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925085152.41852-2-benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] media: verisilicon: ABI breakage by removing deprecated DT binding
- [Low] media: verisilicon: orphaned code and macros left after variant removal
--
commit 16a43be32673e02fd74593fb19bc27c444f75881
Author: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
media: verisilicon: Remove deprecated variant
The "nxp,imx8mq-vpu" compatible string has been deprecated since commit
f3116f2e52e6 split the G1 and G2 nodes. This patch removes the driver
reference to this old binding to clean up the code.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> index ad71c0402ef3b..12c804dcc6694 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> @@ -725,7 +725,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_hantro_match[] = {
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_HANTRO_IMX8M
> { .compatible = "nxp,imx8mm-vpu-g1", .data = &imx8mm_vpu_g1_variant, },
> - { .compatible = "nxp,imx8mq-vpu", .data = &imx8mq_vpu_variant, },
[Severity: High]
Does removing this binding break backward compatibility with older Device Tree
Blobs (DTBs)? Device trees typically act as a stable ABI in Linux. Removing
this entry prevents the driver from binding to older DTBs that have not split
the G1 and G2 nodes, resulting in a loss of hardware video acceleration on
those systems. Even if deprecated, should the binding remain supported to ensure
older firmware continues to boot successfully?
> { .compatible = "nxp,imx8mq-vpu-g1", .data = &imx8mq_vpu_g1_variant },
> { .compatible = "nxp,imx8mq-vpu-g2", .data = &imx8mq_vpu_g2_variant },
> #endif
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/imx8m_vpu_hw.c b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/imx8m_vpu_hw.c
> index fa4224de4b996..b091d807ae4e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/imx8m_vpu_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/imx8m_vpu_hw.c
> @@ -25,55 +25,6 @@
> #define CTRL_G1_PP_FUSE 0x0c
> #define CTRL_G2_DEC_FUSE 0x10
>
> -static void imx8m_soft_reset(struct hantro_dev *vpu, u32 reset_bits)
> -{
[Severity: Low]
With the removal of imx8mq_runtime_resume() and imx8m_soft_reset() in this
patch, several hardware control macros are left completely unused.
Could these unused macros also be removed from the top of the file?
- CTRL_SOFT_RESET, RESET_G1, RESET_G2
- CTRL_CLOCK_ENABLE, CLOCK_G1, CLOCK_G2
- CTRL_G1_DEC_FUSE, CTRL_G1_PP_FUSE, CTRL_G2_DEC_FUSE
Additionally, since imx8mq_vpu_variant was the only variant using
the runtime_resume function pointer in struct hantro_variant, should
runtime_resume be removed from the struct entirely in hantro.h?
hantro_runtime_resume() in hantro_drv.c is now effectively a no-op for all
platforms.
Finally, could the dangling extern const struct hantro_variant
imx8mq_vpu_variant declaration in hantro_hw.h be dropped too?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925085152.41852-1-benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 8:51 [PATCH v4 0/3] media: verisilicon: remove unused variant and code clean up Benjamin Gaignard
2026-09-25 8:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] media: verisilicon: Remove deprecated variant Benjamin Gaignard
2026-09-25 9:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-25 15:03 ` Frank Li
2026-09-25 8:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] media: dt-bindings: media: nxp, imx8mq-vpu: Remove nxp,imx8mq-vpu Benjamin Gaignard
2026-09-25 8:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 16:45 ` Conor Dooley
2026-09-25 8:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] media: verisilicon: Remove useless internal fields Benjamin Gaignard
2026-09-25 8:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 15:05 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260925090405.59B321F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox