From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874474D0A03 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790351678; cv=none; b=uocwL1OcsvQjtZ1I0sJncuXYvlFnyN/UDyFnbx5vQDHLRg55ZRKPKGlfKrgVFoqvS9lB4AffNPSoZG/CSSXAmSS13lO9+q5Zuv0or6kFpKs9g0U57cgz14tkMXnO9wle5wWuG7QO7X/3AdjI4Zwt/oeHhFMHdWgnULSCXe8QD6s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790351678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hOVeeiRGKBOVaP9c0I07XD1oLeh2IrU5kHbvEh+YhRA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=WrxirohpkEpIumT+CLMMbIFRlkR3IXnEJe36VdxmAzetOMQhw7vyU73e34KEOUuQjpJ/RqGPI8HRmv6EeqjkxW/BNKD3zmPjH8esZkFSzjVQRpISxjTR6oev+e+BdAPi0XY4s38bsydPpz2qOUMMaHw01znr+CIRLolVV1KHsUU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=khpWFvqs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="khpWFvqs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2701F1F000FF; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:54:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790351676; bh=9SwRCfsXo9QmZtYv2xZ4UaOdTTMLheyO5Njmy37oSvI=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=khpWFvqsxZs3a4qwDk4Tkb2UrTWiOS8ceGZ5bQ1aV1BMxSlT37vAgAi0gxjmBZpdP WT2ZP0BHQToA5wyAAccqZ5cNYRUBDrieBCkIZcLy+YnBMdasCZPiTUqEHeShDu90T+ sOjD2IsX4batNatfDUqQ0F2ZZKTaGqEikptsiL30zdzjnbgjyfrTt+gDy+ospd9gPj 07+HCitB/ER78ed34FCnYEzWd6qeG82mVMdyrilh1y5MCDb/PPaUJjZK8xCPMjZCZV XOPAz+q429SfKEZD3fenoe0KkZsdjVwKpNp8geEV3eT5AUcrdOzCKasQ1nH3Cb7NLu vYxICkTAqYPbg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl: Add bindings for MT6735 pin controller Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Yassine Oudjana" Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260925-mt6735-pinctrl-v9-v9-5-bfb19d8bb87c@protonmail.com> References: <20260925-mt6735-pinctrl-v9-v9-0-bfb19d8bb87c@protonmail.com> <20260925-mt6735-pinctrl-v9-v9-5-bfb19d8bb87c@protonmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:54:35 +0000 Message-Id: <20260925155436.2701F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(= s) to consider: - [Low] MAINTAINERS references nonexistent mt6735-pinctrl.h file -- commit 9e8afc5717d48e9d3432a4b635154c2d3231da7e Author: Yassine Oudjana dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl: Add bindings for MT6735 pin = controller This commit adds device tree bindings for the MT6735 pin controller. It updates the YAML schema and MAINTAINERS file, and introduces a new header with pinmux definitions. > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 9765e8a72dc78..3b309160440b8 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -21850,6 +21850,12 @@ F: drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-rt2880.c > F: drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-rt305x.c > F: drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-rt3883.c > =20 > +PIN CONTROLLER - MEDIATEK MT6735 > +M: Yassine Oudjana > +L: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > +S: Maintained > +F: include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6735-pinctrl.h [Severity: Low] Does this MAINTAINERS entry reference a file that does not exist? The patch actually adds include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6735-pinfunc= .h to the tree, but this line points to mediatek,mt6735-pinctrl.h instead. Could this cause the get_maintainer script to silently fail to match the header file, potentially leaving the maintainer unnotified of future change= s? --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925-mt6735-pin= ctrl-v9-v9-0-bfb19d8bb87c@protonmail.com?part=3D5