From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Devarsh Thakkar" <devarsht@ti.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Expose color mode as plane property
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 18:43:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260927184328.6B6B71F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260927182329.4193961-10-devarsht@ti.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: 3-color mode with partial refresh corrupts R1 pixels
- [Medium] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Commit message contradicts color_mode property creation
--
commit 50bd4d2129cba69722affa1695b7f8c68a0578a8
Author: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Expose color mode as plane property
This commit introduces a new DRM plane property called "color_mode" to support
panels with 3-color (black/white/red) display modes. It allows switching
between standard black/white representation and a 3-color representation where
the R1 format designates red ink on a white background.
> Add a DRM plane property "color_mode" for panels that support
> 3-color (black/white/red) display modes.
>
> The property allows runtime selection between:
> - bw (black/white): R1 format represents black (0) and white (1)
> - 3color: R1 format represents red ink (1) on white background
>
> This property is only created on panels with red_supported = true.
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message states the property is only created on panels where red
is supported.
However, the code in ssd16xx_plane_create_properties() appears to create
it unconditionally for all panels (while restricting the selectable enum
options if unsupported).
Is this description accurate?
> The default is set from the panel configuration's default_color_mode
> field (typically BW for monochrome panels).
>
> Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd16xx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd16xx.c
index dc2b8fe536af3..3815af0cee5c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd16xx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd16xx.c
[ ... ]
@@ -1568,6 +1587,7 @@ static void ssd16xx_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
}
device->refresh_mode = new_ssd->refresh_mode;
+ device->color_mode = new_ssd->color_mode;
[Severity: High]
When a user sets color_mode to 3COLOR and refresh_mode to PARTIAL,
device->color_mode is updated here before calling ssd16xx_fb_dirty().
However, looking at ssd16xx_fb_dirty():
drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd16xx.c:ssd16xx_fb_dirty() {
...
if (device->color_mode == SSD16XX_COLOR_MODE_3COLOR &&
(device->refresh_mode == SSD16XX_REFRESH_FULL ||
device->refresh_mode == SSD16XX_REFRESH_FAST)) {
red_buffer = device->tx_red_buf;
}
...
if (red_buffer)
ssd16xx_convert_fb_to_3color(mono_buffer, red_buffer, &map, fb, rect);
else
ssd16xx_convert_fb_to_1bpp(mono_buffer, &map, fb, rect, device->orientation);
...
}
Because red_buffer is only initialized for FULL or FAST refresh modes, a
PARTIAL refresh in 3-color mode leaves red_buffer as NULL.
This triggers the fallback to ssd16xx_convert_fb_to_1bpp(), which copies
R1 bits directly and interprets them as luma (0=black, 1=white) instead of
the 3-color expectation (0=white, 1=red).
Can this lead to corrupted R1 pixel colors during a partial refresh?
/*
* When refresh_mode_init was set, use the specified mode for this first
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260927182329.4193961-1-devarsht@ti.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-27 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-27 18:23 [PATCH v2 00/14] Add DRM driver for Solomon SSD16xx e-paper display controllers Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Dalian Good Display Co., Ltd Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] dt-bindings: display: Add Solomon SSD16xx e-paper controller binding Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 6:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-05 16:36 ` Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] dt-bindings: display: solomon,ssd16xx: Add Solomon SSD1677 controller Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 6:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/solomon: Add DRM driver for Solomon SSD16xx e-paper display controllers Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 7:00 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-09-29 16:43 ` Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Add clear_on_init/close/disable session management Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Add support for Solomon SSD1677 controller Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Add power management support Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Expose refresh mode as plane property Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Expose color " Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: Expose session management as plane properties Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/solomon: ssd16xx: support panels whose RAM X order is reversed Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Solomon SSD16xx DRM driver Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] arm64: defconfig: Enable DRM_SSD16XX for AM62L3 EVM Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:23 ` [DO_NOT_MERGE PATCH v2 14/14] arm64: dts: ti: Add AM62L3 EVM overlay for GDEY042T81 e-paper display Devarsh Thakkar
2026-09-27 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] Add DRM driver for Solomon SSD16xx e-paper display controllers LiangCheng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260927184328.6B6B71F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devarsht@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox