Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexey Charkov" <alchark@flipper.net>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] power: reset: syscon-reboot-mode: enable supplies for the next stage
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:39:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929103901.E1A1B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929-b4-rk3576-reboot-mode-v2-3-5a34ca72065a@flipper.net>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] power: reset: uninitialized pointer passed to regulator_bulk_enable()
--

commit cdeebbc0731de671c753a5b987cb44186458c7fb
Author: Alexey Charkov <alchark@flipper.net>

power: reset: syscon-reboot-mode: enable supplies for the next stage

This patch adds support for enabling power supplies named in the reboot mode
node when a boot mode is written. It requests the supplies in the probe
function using of_regulator_bulk_get_all() and enables them during reboot to
ensure the PMIC configuration is suitable for early boot code on the next
startup.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260929-regulator-get-all-v1-1-e887c66a47f1@flipper.net/

> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/syscon-reboot-mode.c b/drivers/power/reset/syscon-reboot-mode.c
> index e0772c9f70f7a..5ef882d818161 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/reset/syscon-reboot-mode.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/syscon-reboot-mode.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -28,6 +32,20 @@ static int syscon_reboot_mode_write(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot,
>  
>  	syscon_rbm = container_of(reboot, struct syscon_reboot_mode, reboot);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Whatever acts on the mode (e.g. boot ROM) runs before the operating
> +	 * system, and may need supplies that the running system had powered
> +	 * down. Enable them here, and deliberately leave them enabled: the
> +	 * system is on its way down, and what runs next may not know how to
> +	 * turn them on.
> +	 */
> +	if (syscon_rbm->num_supplies) {
> +		ret = regulator_bulk_enable(syscon_rbm->num_supplies,
> +					    syscon_rbm->supplies);
                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Severity: High]
Does this code introduce a regression if regulator_bulk_enable() fails?

The commit message notes a separate fix for the core API issue where
of_regulator_bulk_get_all() leaves the supply names uninitialized. Because
of_regulator_bulk_get_all() uses kmalloc_objs() internally (which does not
zero memory), the 'supply' field in the returned array contains garbage
pointers:

drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c:of_regulator_bulk_get_all() {
    ...
    _consumers = kmalloc_objs(struct regulator_bulk_data, num_consumers);
    ...
}

If regulator_bulk_enable() fails, the error path in the regulator core will
attempt to print the name of the failing supply:

drivers/regulator/core.c:regulator_bulk_enable() {
    ...
    pr_err("Failed to enable %s: %pe\n", consumers[i].supply,
           ERR_PTR(consumers[i].ret));
    ...
}

Because this patch relies on an uninitialized array from
of_regulator_bulk_get_all(), applying it independently introduces a regression
where the kernel will panic if a hardware issue or misconfiguration causes
regulator_bulk_enable() to fail during reboot.

> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			dev_err(reboot->dev, "enabling reboot mode supplies failed\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = regmap_update_bits(syscon_rbm->map, syscon_rbm->offset,
>  				 syscon_rbm->mask, magic);
[ ... ]
> @@ -59,6 +85,21 @@ static int syscon_reboot_mode_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "mask", &syscon_rbm->mask);
>  
> +	ret = of_regulator_bulk_get_all(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.of_node,
> +					&syscon_rbm->supplies);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> +				     "can't get reboot mode supplies\n");
> +
> +	syscon_rbm->num_supplies = ret;
> +	if (syscon_rbm->num_supplies) {
> +		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
> +					       syscon_reboot_mode_put_supplies,
> +					       syscon_rbm);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260929-b4-rk3576-reboot-mode-v2-0-5a34ca72065a@flipper.net?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29 10:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] power: reset: syscon-reboot-mode: Add support for Rockchip RK3576 reboot modes Alexey Charkov
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: add boot ROM download boot mode Alexey Charkov
2026-09-30 11:45   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-30 13:56     ` Alexey Charkov
2026-10-06 15:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: power: reset: syscon-reboot-mode: allow supplies Alexey Charkov
2026-09-30 11:47   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-30 11:50     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-30 11:58       ` Alexey Charkov
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] power: reset: syscon-reboot-mode: enable supplies for the next stage Alexey Charkov
2026-09-29 10:39   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reboot-mode node to RK3576 Alexey Charkov
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: name the reboot mode supplies on RK3576 EVB1 Alexey Charkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260929103901.E1A1B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=alchark@flipper.net \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox