Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Komal Bajaj" <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: shikra-evk: Add GPIO expanders
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 13:58:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001135839.459FD1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-shikra-gpio-expander-v3-1-d30c1e8067db@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] dts: incorrect compatible strings for I2C GPIO expanders
--

commit 1d7a662c567d09ded1460a7741dd86e406ccdb82
Author: Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>

arm64: dts: qcom: shikra-evk: Add GPIO expanders

This commit adds the EVK GPIO expander definitions on the I2C3 bus.
It describes the TCA9538 and TCA9539 expanders used by EVK boards.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-evk.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-evk.dtsi
> index 7fbd6d1de19ad..1c49cb52ce12b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-evk.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-evk.dtsi
[ ... ]
> +&i2c3 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	expander0: gpio@20 {
> +		compatible = "ti,tca9539";
> +		reg = <0x20>;

[Severity: Low]
Is this the correct compatible string for the hardware present at this I2C
address?

The ti,tca9539 IC is hardcoded to respond at 0x74-0x77 and cannot physically
respond at I2C address 0x20. Are the chips present at 0x20 and 0x21 actually
TCA9535 or PCA9535 ICs, which use the 0x20-0x27 address range?

> +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		gpio-controller;
> +	};
> +
> +	expander1: gpio@21 {
> +		compatible = "ti,tca9539";
> +		reg = <0x21>;
> +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		gpio-controller;
> +	};
> +
> +	expander2: gpio@38 {
> +		compatible = "ti,tca9538";
> +		reg = <0x38>;

[Severity: Low]
Is this compatible string accurate for this address?

The ti,tca9538 IC is hardcoded to the 0x70-0x73 range and cannot respond at
0x38. Are the ICs located at 0x38 and 0x3c actually TCA9554 or PCA9554
expanders?

> +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		gpio-controller;
> +	};
[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001-shikra-gpio-expander-v3-1-d30c1e8067db@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 13:49 [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: shikra-evk: Add GPIO expanders Komal Bajaj
2026-10-01 13:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261001135839.459FD1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox