From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F8453C7685; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 16:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791132658; cv=none; b=CF4rsDpFjXVu9NThCsN2dt7McQeKQsKxoASRTfN2bule+rQgQ12RU6dSP+jK7Z6G6BFSuzFtmx9yiDj7tC0XaTJ/QyP+uP6C/nej0yswCF+n/zckqJushxHo2GHQFtDdbhfRsIWfxRJ5jNKAZAkRaypUuFdV8QudznoZ791H1U4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791132658; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JXSPLFHFWp41xF4FlvC4+Wtb0mQxXkCErio9PDsMkfk=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=EV0b0bZvocwYFclNH2OU7js6t354zF9p3kKge39qoxS59Fd2hRe9Lhrx3xjtmAU0BoGthAJWnve4NcusXXHs2VSoj/kYsFTFPMQOpEpQT2DzJ9IdRhH3CBymQDdxUP26+60hsloCcJU5hU341O7nV4ZgiTQhV0cK8vRArvaiNkQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IOfzX0q0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IOfzX0q0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86DE01F00898; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 16:50:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791132657; bh=5AdhvBZtdreGBBfmpt7FZcqlh2Deh824eypm0xyIOvo=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=IOfzX0q0fXUn9Sc5DYV52XXzTIAESBsA09hUyPpXTE2HuFjdVdpB9hr+5jlynu1tp AtpDcUAAR5m/HoiDqC2frk7sF1VjZzjkkNdAp62BLaSmZks0xlTxe4ypn+mVwbd6Uu pqpx/XaYgNG25y/W6OB2Ef0CpEfHiyyASvTS2sueJpniV6zEMK7+Sl/P889hIT1Nd3 RFz09EusddKAdf808WYmCeJ/EZnFAx5eqroa78V7j8ze/TLmsfleTJyBfzh3HQ63aB gVd2JWVQTfRPi+x3NosarB3x9ltj/TqI6UgP2QmLilBH7f/2/XzKFHOygeFjjG32ie 5YM7Mho9bJVuA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: Document Skyworks AAT2870 Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Svyatoslav Ryhel" Cc: lee@kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org In-Reply-To: <20261004164121.193514-2-clamor95@gmail.com> References: <20261004164121.193514-1-clamor95@gmail.com> <20261004164121.193514-2-clamor95@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 16:50:56 +0000 Message-Id: <20261004165056.86DE01F00898@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(= s) to consider: - [Low] dt-bindings: missing `type: object` constraints for child nodes -- commit 44544968b5bc5130f1768962ce3f85c8bc12cfad Author: Svyatoslav Ryhel dt-bindings: mfd: Document Skyworks AAT2870 Document Skyworks AAT2870 LED Backlight Driver and Multiple LDO Lighting Management Unit. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/skyworks,aat2870.yaml= b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/skyworks,aat2870.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..014678616076f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/skyworks,aat2870.yaml [ ... ] > + vin-supply: > + description: Regulator providing power to the "IN" pin. > + > + backlight: > + $ref: /schemas/leds/backlight/common.yaml# > + unevaluatedProperties: false [Severity: Low] Does this node definition need an explicit type: object? Since this backlight property references /schemas/leds/backlight/common.yam= l# which does not define type: object at its root, the dt_binding_check schema validation tool will fail with a type is missing error when checking this new schema. In dt-schema, properties representing child nodes must explicit= ly declare type: object if it is not inherited from a $ref. [ ... ] > + patternProperties: > + "^(ldo-(a|b|c|d))$": > + $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml# > + unevaluatedProperties: false [Severity: Low] Similarly, do these regulator subnodes matching ldo-[a-d] require a type: object constraint? Like the backlight node above, the referenced external schema (/schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#) does not inherently provide type: obje= ct, which will also result in validation failures. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004164121.1935= 14-1-clamor95@gmail.com?part=3D1