From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Carlo Szelinsky" <github@szelinsky.de>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 3/7] net: pse-pd: unwind allocations when controller registration fails
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:43:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005164306.0BDF21F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004164219.1161294-4-github@szelinsky.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] net: pse-pd: TOCTOU race and NULL pointer dereference via unguarded pcdev->pi[i].pw_d assignment
--
commit 8c5741051355bc530c2efc50d6e4e9ebe8e283f3
Author: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
net: pse-pd: unwind allocations when controller registration fails
This commit unwinds allocations when pse_controller_register() fails. It
updates the error paths to properly free the notification kfifo, flush
the power domains, and clear the power domain pointers to NULL to avoid
dangling references.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
> --- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
> @@ -937,11 +937,21 @@ static void pse_flush_pw_ds(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev)
> continue;
>
> pw_d = xa_load(&pse_pw_d_map, pcdev->pi[i].pw_d->id);
> - if (!pw_d)
> + if (!pw_d) {
> + pcdev->pi[i].pw_d = NULL;
> continue;
> + }
>
> kref_put_mutex(&pw_d->refcnt, __pse_pw_d_release,
> &pse_pw_d_mutex);
> + /* The pw_d is devm memory of whichever controller created
> + * it, so it can go away as soon as that probe unwinds.
> + * Nothing may be left pointing at it: pse_pi_is_enabled()
> + * reaches pi[].pw_d from the regulator "state" attribute,
> + * which stays readable until the PI regulators are
> + * unregistered after us.
> + */
> + pcdev->pi[i].pw_d = NULL;
[Severity: High]
Does setting pcdev->pi[i].pw_d to NULL here without holding pcdev->lock
introduce a race condition with concurrent sysfs accesses?
Since the PI regulators are registered via devm_pse_pi_regulator_register()
and accessible via sysfs before pse_flush_pw_ds() is called in the error
path, a concurrent read of the regulator attributes could invoke regulator
operations like pse_pi_is_enabled(). These operations take pcdev->lock and
can call into pse_pi_allocate_pw_budget().
In pse_pi_allocate_pw_budget(), pi->pw_d is evaluated twice without READ_ONCE:
if (!pi->pw_d)
return 0;
/* PSE_BUDGET_EVAL_STRAT_STATIC */
if (pi->pw_d->budget_eval_strategy == PSE_BUDGET_EVAL_STRAT_STATIC)
If pcdev->pi[i].pw_d is set to NULL concurrently between the null check and
the dereference, could this cause a TOCTOU NULL pointer dereference?
> }
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004164219.1161294-1-github@szelinsky.de?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-04 16:42 [PATCH net-next v8 0/7] net: pse-pd: decouple controller lookup from MDIO probe Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-04 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/7] net: pse-pd: add notifier chain for controller lifecycle events Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-04 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/7] net: pse-pd: fire lifecycle events on controller register/unregister Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-05 17:33 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-04 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v8 3/7] net: pse-pd: unwind allocations when controller registration fails Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-05 16:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-05 17:33 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-04 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v8 4/7] net: pse-pd: si3474: use dev_err_probe() for controller registration Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-04 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v8 5/7] net: pse-pd: check the PI vpwr supply before registering the controller Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-05 17:33 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-04 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v8 6/7] of: property: do not let "pses" block a consumer's probe Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-05 17:33 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-04 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v8 7/7] net: phy: own phydev->psec via PSE notifier and remove fwnode_mdio hook Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-05 17:33 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261005164306.0BDF21F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=github@szelinsky.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).