From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Serv Pol" <servpol@tuta.io>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU battery driver
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 22:34:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005223455.4C4251F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005-gl-e750-mcu-v1-2-499d2e31f786@tuta.io>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] gl-e750-mcu: unconditional buffer clearing drops async UART events
- [High] gl-e750-mcu: newline-less status replies block async JSON parsing
--
commit df0b44f7ad4b4bbb857745d8458ec2b575186c6f
Author: Serv Pol <servpol@tuta.io>
power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU battery driver
This patch adds a power supply driver for the GL.iNet GL-E750 travel router's
status microcontroller. It polls the battery status via JSON over UART every
30 seconds, and shuts the system down cleanly if a shut_down JSON event is
received from the MCU.
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/gl-e750-mcu.c b/drivers/power/supply/gl-e750-mcu.c
> index 0000000000000..0799e41d58a9a 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/gl-e750-mcu.c
[ ... ]
> +static size_t mcu_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev, const u8 *data,
> + size_t count)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /* JSON events from the MCU come without a line ending */
> + if (c == '}' && mcu->rx_line[0] == '{' &&
> + strncmp(mcu->rx_line, "{OK}", 4)) {
[Severity: High]
Does this logic correctly handle asynchronous events appended to a pending
status reply?
If the MCU replies to a status request without a newline, the reply stays in
rx_line until the 1.5s timeout. If an asynchronous JSON event (like
{"shut_down": "1"}) arrives during this window, it is appended to rx_line.
The fast-path JSON parser in mcu_receive_buf() will ignore the new event
because strncmp(mcu->rx_line, "{OK}", 4) evaluates to 0 (the buffer still
starts with the pending status reply).
> + mcu->rx_line[mcu->rx_len] = '\0';
> + mcu_handle_line(mcu, mcu->rx_line);
> + mcu->rx_len = 0;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mcu->lock, flags);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static void mcu_poll_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&mcu->lock, flags);
> + mcu->rx_len = 0;
[Severity: High]
Could this unconditional buffer clearing drop asynchronous UART events?
If the MCU is actively transmitting an asynchronous event (e.g., flipping the
power switch) when this 30-second poll triggers, the partially received message
currently in rx_line is discarded here. This can lead to an abrupt hard power
cut instead of a clean system shutdown.
> + reinit_completion(&mcu->reply);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mcu->lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = serdev_device_write(mcu->serdev, mcu_status_req,
> + sizeof(mcu_status_req) - 1, timeout);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_warn_ratelimited(&mcu->serdev->dev, "write failed: %d\n", ret);
> + } else if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&mcu->reply, timeout)) {
> + /* the reply may also come without a line ending */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&mcu->lock, flags);
> + mcu->rx_line[mcu->rx_len] = '\0';
> + if (!(mcu->rx_len > 4 && !strncmp(mcu->rx_line, "{OK}", 4) &&
> + mcu_parse_status(mcu, mcu->rx_line)))
[Severity: High]
Will this parse the combined buffer correctly?
When the 1.5s timeout subsequently triggers, mcu_parse_status() attempts to
parse the concatenated string. The parsing fails because the final numeric field
(cycles) is concatenated with the JSON event (e.g., 10{"shut_down": "1"}), which
fails strict string-to-integer conversion (kstrtoint()). Both messages are then
lost.
> + dev_dbg(&mcu->serdev->dev, "no status reply\n");
> + mcu->rx_len = 0;
[Severity: High]
Similarly, does clearing the buffer here truncate asynchronous events that were
just being received when the timeout expires?
Like the pre-emptive clear at the start of mcu_poll_work(), clearing rx_len
here on timeout risks discarding partially received asynchronous messages. Both
issues can result in missing the critical "shut_down" signal.
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mcu->lock, flags);
> + }
> +
> + schedule_delayed_work(&mcu->poll_work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(MCU_POLL_INTERVAL_MS));
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261005-gl-e750-mcu-v1-0-499d2e31f786@tuta.io?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 22:25 [PATCH 0/2] power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU battery driver Serv Pol via B4 Relay
2026-10-05 22:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU Serv Pol via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 10:34 ` Conor Dooley
2026-10-05 22:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU battery driver Serv Pol via B4 Relay
2026-10-05 22:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261005223455.4C4251F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=servpol@tuta.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox