On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 12:34:59PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] dt-bindings: missing LDB constraints for nxp,imx95-lvds-csr variant
> --
> 
> commit ef256d56e7840a3d6a825d4ac33adad77eacd513
> Author: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@oss.nxp.com>
> 
> dt-bindings: clock: nxp,imx95-blk-ctl: Add ldb child node
> 
> Since the BLK CTL registers, like the LVDS CSR, can be used to control the
> LVDS Display Bridge controllers, add 'ldb' child node to handle
> these use cases.
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nxp,imx95-blk-ctl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nxp,imx95-blk-ctl.yaml
> > index fbbf1b3f17904..97fe816a38f94 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nxp,imx95-blk-ctl.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nxp,imx95-blk-ctl.yaml
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -63,7 +67,9 @@ allOf:
> >        properties:
> >          compatible:
> >            contains:
> > -            const: nxp,imx95-camera-csr
> > +            enum:
> > +              - nxp,imx94-lvds-csr
> > +              - nxp,imx95-camera-csr
> >      then:
> >        required:
> >          - '#address-cells'
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Could this introduce a regression where device tree validation incorrectly fails
> for i.MX95 devices that define an ldb child node under the LVDS CSR?

This ldb child is new, how could there be a regression like this?

> 
> This change restricts #address-cells and #size-cells to these two strings,
> forcing them to false for nxp,imx95-lvds-csr. Should nxp,imx95-lvds-csr also
> be included in this enum?
> 
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -72,8 +78,24 @@ allOf:
> >        properties:
> >          '#address-cells': false
> >          '#size-cells': false
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          not:
> > +            contains:
> > +              const: nxp,imx95-camera-csr
> > +    then:
> >        patternProperties:
> >          '^formatter@[0-9a-f]+$': false
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          not:
> > +            contains:
> > +              const: nxp,imx94-lvds-csr
> > +    then:
> > +      patternProperties:
> > +        '^ldb@[0-9a-f]+$': false
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does this introduce a regression by preventing nxp,imx95-lvds-csr from
> declaring an ldb child node?
> 
> This explicitly forbids the ldb child node for anything other than
> nxp,imx94-lvds-csr, thereby silently prohibiting it for nxp,imx95-lvds-csr.
> 
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261006-dcif-upstreaming-v10-0-bcfb28de0aae@oss.nxp.com?part=6