From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75168457E73; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 10:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791541088; cv=none; b=u8cPul5hRa0nGT1dkUPL+jpjeOJtSvu+hXe9foNGuYKaTV5q/whEBHh3WRXpBaJ5LMqk/1BfSgGNY9gqJtZRZGbMtAtf7BkbGz0x3+aKNIoPF1aowXJ9L5yfR6/TVonYoh3ALA5pszoTFKe4iHx6RWSBbKN6VUhIkq2u+UNWDkw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791541088; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+DNKmuouHw3F2sUn7rERptXulQELLgYCH592z3UCDWQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=erJhTaC72LtU990G8ZeBMmOTS69eCKyEfoaVgBAt8jRfl/7gAqS1MLDwtkOdB509Bgud8vVSy+F0tvx7PgUGkEr/Z1sKfElRHNS6fUbCkjwi4HTzP13EX8mzWp8+9ZIm8899Pg43j5DXSqYxaMIwdbcEPVOSvBCQ9y8Dgik459c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MIDk5/IU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MIDk5/IU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AE501F000FF; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 10:18:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791541087; bh=2IK08WvoWJC1h6DlgEI7ITQrkIpsRhrwFymhPxbueT8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=MIDk5/IU6tP3YARpKWHfyeeG7ABschktkAyCEp43D1TgmMbNhOnbWuBEzKUe9lWMR /CeFpSIl8ufe90s/Wj6YSXA790NYrCVsD/XaiFPrAXIUoy5zv077JDbwfOGfBHnyE/ sYHwIJ6/3zjaaO/jmSOCGbNfKnCqX4PMK8LZEGaoxVzmJ0SWiD3f9xAnAAu3gdQZsl rP020XSgCfBZJozzUCXHBjZlzD9pHyfe1LVKQZcyQU+wwfTu4KrSPWEs2Tv7/4Jpv5 hsvQXwOCt7ynkBKCapGo5icvAj5mPENhu6iEZFYuyLRzhlSD6Chd9NXO7gQtP/ABb1 3FJyzVLyxAj7A== Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 12:18:03 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Tim Kuo Cc: Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Steven Liu , Sky Huang , Sam Shih Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: mediatek,spi-mt65xx: add MT7987/MT7989 compatibles Message-ID: <20261009-tricky-fine-aardwolf-cca31a@quoll> References: <20261008085332.802898-1-Tim.Kuo@mediatek.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261008085332.802898-1-Tim.Kuo@mediatek.com> On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 04:53:31PM +0800, Tim Kuo wrote: > The MT7987 and MT7989 SPI IPs are IPM designs, so they keep > "mediatek,spi-ipm" as their fallback compatible, but they widen the tick > delay field of SPI_CMD_REG and therefore need compatibles of their own. > > Signed-off-by: Tim Kuo > --- > v2: Add mt7987 and mt7989 real device compatible > v3: > - Drop "mediatek,spi-ipm-v59" > - Move compatible of mt7987 and mt7989 to group of spi-ipm fallback > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml > index 3bf3eb1f8728..63b23928c734 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml > @@ -35,8 +35,10 @@ properties: > - enum: > - mediatek,mt7981-spi-ipm > - mediatek,mt7986-spi-ipm > + - mediatek,mt7987-spi > - mediatek,mt7988-spi-quad > - mediatek,mt7988-spi-single > + - mediatek,mt7989-spi > - mediatek,mt8188-spi-ipm > - const: mediatek,spi-ipm Nope. How is this a specific compatible? Look at git or even read the REST of this file. Best regards, Krzysztof