From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-10631.protonmail.ch (mail-10631.protonmail.ch [79.135.106.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2395D3E9F93; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.31 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792134126; cv=none; b=InNnYZw77Z/6qjAoGGvjtdDYd3eEf1dFx9dBj7S2BBJQ9p5gYJfcnMuNUjyTS8iXJa6FRqN0Ib41dFS9+9hSTuqW4pJUOJ5r7C855EM/fb6/MGGnd0M2vg7NO7itBStl20p7pnTgdG5dzjU1mX04ybmGKjFW6KQ9WN5RnI47aKc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792134126; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AQi/9A/y64vKci75UOD1V3dJqNZtHvVbxX8L8DK3VUA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lzfXVa9WzeSrnIG8rzewjFB9ASlMO4xMa0dbL7O29rmTihFIY2EEa3ddIRvHLIH5JigiY0wlBWMgzrX/6jOotYsIgz95MGh8qP0gFEMeweCzX/QZhSxvg57LsrXzBv3HSMg1k03rw90Rff00ebhWYF+BHXmiBFvuPsoET1+KhwY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pm.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pm.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pm.me header.i=@pm.me header.b=lmJ+cQ1a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.31 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pm.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pm.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pm.me header.i=@pm.me header.b="lmJ+cQ1a" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pm.me; s=protonmail3; t=1792134115; x=1792393315; bh=AQi/9A/y64vKci75UOD1V3dJqNZtHvVbxX8L8DK3VUA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=lmJ+cQ1ao7nQu/b7B+ruW03ulKndn0pRQzdBTFjQ3pF1/8f8WVyiC6AZaAilVzL3a su2BcgrGBAbuiUdtXmjKgxB01ED6os85vut+nwqkoUnqL4qcd9zDcaL+6/h2rm840D oZboYgHZ3ll/cbBm+RtwhN5g8gUSiTGd+nFdM2jyHb5dCwNhqMrwVRfJnDIARBCno5 ter66W1c65Ja8oBzT6HZ6rG8C5QgVgCzYgkq26ASuJSX7Fnbx67WRBf16Q/qMkOtC/ PHxgAdWzhiqqmVtye9G7nPBTUZ05HI7OWMm5FV/n/ECJA/VsM5yNB0QCGATd4t1DS8 O0Ts1PoUOTttw== Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:01:50 +0000 To: George Neacsu From: Sergey Lebedev Cc: Sakari Ailus , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , German Pablo Lindo , Bryan O'Donoghue , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] media: ov13858: device tree support for the Surface Pro 11 (Snapdragon) Message-ID: <20261016070018.11932-1-lsa.uz@pm.me> In-Reply-To: <20261015-ov13858-x1e-v1-0-acdd918f4fb6@gmail.com> References: <20261015-ov13858-x1e-v1-0-acdd918f4fb6@gmail.com> Feedback-ID: 113843758:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 4c6c5d4014db768c4361150de54b0e3e231ae605 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi George, On the Intel model, with the power-on v3 and these two on media next, the new endpoint check passes with the endpoint ipu-bridge builds (four lanes, 540 and 270 MHz). The sensor streams 4224x3136 at 29.95 fps, and v4l2-compliance passes 46 of 46 on the subdev. Through the media device one test fails, Active VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FMT, because ov13858_update_pad_format() never sets the colorspace. That is in media next's driver already, not in these patches. Tested-by: Sergey Lebedev # Surface Pro 11 (Intel) Thank you for picking up the power patch as a base. Sergey