From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-2uec-a98.jellyfish.systems (out-2uec-a98.jellyfish.systems [63.250.43.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A74893B14A8 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=63.250.43.98 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792358464; cv=none; b=Yz204ou20qfYAG1flWQlIGr6dWzRDb3T1/kc1Ns0SHQaCKPeLwL9bEqaCuh32L+H6AhJ56e4A+7cRFpWKJ+A9cuTqvq1UZez1xF2Q4YlEJlXWLmGLv/+OTD28vBl5HukEX8oT7wnhlz9DUe477JQx2C8+UV+5GENIKm5cQ5m6Lk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792358464; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a22fV/RS6LK4q5vntBORpd4MDnqFImtey92ifh/lcGE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=e10VCbf0XyeW4YdxH6j1EyAD3/vcEeXHpBKJEDC+AO3FTClxPVJv4fAo5yVcDF2fmXleP2civVigDGnNcKl8LEBNRqQoNqDHpvx96FNvWF4BBhTg98k4N8hM4WIpkqm61gZSl5iBp7rTxKB4YWxP8Qpche/siQNHzLXTmSMcnyY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=r-sc.ca; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=r-sc.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=r-sc.ca header.i=@r-sc.ca header.b=C8ecvgvh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=63.250.43.98 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=r-sc.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=r-sc.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=r-sc.ca header.i=@r-sc.ca header.b="C8ecvgvh" Received: from DESKTOP-290OH2S (d207-6-150-133.bchsia.telus.net [207.6.150.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.spacemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4j7BRt2ssDz8sWP; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 21:20:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=r-sc.ca; s=spacemail; t=1792358459; bh=a22fV/RS6LK4q5vntBORpd4MDnqFImtey92ifh/lcGE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=C8ecvgvh9Sv180UXcOgFU3ffgyySZzWV6GqMVPlffIiCIMIg0BRhXcKV5pO+0In+Z BaB6BjqH1NyMyMitek8PI69O1w5tWSFNekQQjYPt57Fm6Cs6P+SRRIwPB//0vZs3Io KCoPaJRLVrT9+1ekU4XhzH3NGZPhBZtoL00a9YSsyZbWOx570ItYb6tWUJWtbZLlb/ qkdkl2DDHya1rGPeLe2MHQVGRgmeOBoESVb5Id0oUgakkx2K2KJehVrQc7DmPLENrj vEQe5xIpImAePOdaeZP8ByKnQTgu5I+/2v8TA5PUp7ejnEUKo7jUt37H3wHtv7yuMi flo38XXGp+cHw== From: Ross Cawston To: andi.shyti@kernel.org Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, gustavoars@kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ross Cawston Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: add GPIO buses sharing one SCL line Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 14:20:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20261018212051.135-1-ross@r-sc.ca> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0.windows.5 In-Reply-To: <20261018194315.945-1-ross@r-sc.ca> References: <20261018194315.945-1-ross@r-sc.ca> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Envelope-From: ross@r-sc.ca Hi, Please drop this series. As the automated review points out, i2c-gpio has handled buses that share one SCL line since commit 645c3d7d07fa ("i2c: i2c-gpio: Enhance driver for buses with shared SCL") in v7.3, which I had missed. The MokerLink POE-10G07110GSM will use i2c-gpio instead. Sorry for the noise. Ross