Re: [PATCH v15 07/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP

["TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)" <TingHan.Shen@mediatek.com>]

Hi Mathieu,

On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 13:59 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:41:26AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> > The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
> > the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
> > driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
> > to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.
> > 
> > Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
> > When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
> > through the cluster list.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > index d67dcabdab9e..34095a461e15 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > @@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > -				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
> > +				      const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > @@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  	scp = rproc->priv;
> >  	scp->rproc = rproc;
> >  	scp->dev = dev;
> > -	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +	scp->data = of_data;
> >  	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
> >  
> > @@ -951,15 +952,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > -			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > +static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +			       struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> >  	struct mtk_scp *scp;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > +	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
> >  	if (IS_ERR(scp))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(scp);
> >  
> > @@ -975,6 +976,102 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +			      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> > +	struct platform_device *cpdev;
> > +	struct device_node *child;
> > +	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> > +	const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> > +	int core_id = 0;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +
> > +	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> > +		if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
> > +			of_node_put(child);
> > +			goto init_fail;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> > +		if (!cpdev) {
> > +			ret = -ENODEV;
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
> > +			of_node_put(child);
> > +			goto init_fail;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
> > +		put_device(&cpdev->dev);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
> > +			ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
> > +			of_node_put(child);
> > +			goto init_fail;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
> > +			of_node_put(child);
> > +			scp_free(scp);
> > +			goto init_fail;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
> > +		core_id++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, list_first_entry(scp_list, struct mtk_scp, elem));
> 
> (sigh)
> 
> Why is list_first_entry() used here rather than just @scp?  What is the purpose
> of using the list API?

I thought it would be more consistent to use the head node when removing the scp drvier.
I'll do what you suggest.


Best regards,
TingHan

> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +init_fail:
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, scp_list, elem) {
> > +		list_del(&scp->elem);
> > +		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> > +		scp_free(scp);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> > +	struct device_node *child;
> > +
> > +	child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
> > +	if (!child)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
> > +
> > +	of_node_put(child);
> > +	return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > +	else
> > +		ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -1007,6 +1104,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
> >  
> > +	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
> > +
> >  	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> > @@ -1101,12 +1202,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
> >  	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> > +	&mt8195_of_data,
> > +	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
> > +	NULL
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
> >  	{},
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
> > -- 
> > 2.18.0