Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] i2c: designware: enable SLAVE in platform module

[Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

On 28-Dec-16 15:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 14:43 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>> - Slave mode selected in platform module (devicetree support only)
>> - Check for ACPI - not supported in SLAVE mode:
>>   - Changed the ifndef style to the use of ACPI_HANDLE that returns
>> NULL
>>     if the device was not enumerated from ACPI namespace.
> 
> I'm not sure what is wrong with ACPI?

I dont have a way to test it. Just that.
>  
>> @@ -264,9 +297,16 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>  	if (r)
>>  		return r;
>>  
>> -	dev->functionality = I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR |
>> DW_IC_DEFAULT_FUNCTIONALITY;
>> -
>> -	i2c_dw_configure_master(pdev);
> 
>> +	if (ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev) == NULL) {
> 
> I don't think you need this at all.

This is to avoid the use of the "ifdef" style I used before.
> 
>> +		device_for_each_child_node(&pdev->dev, child) {
> 
> This is resource agnostic.
> 
>> +			fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
> 
> This is as well.

Are you suggesting I use of_ functions?
> 
>> +			if (reg & I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS)
>> +				i2c_dw_configure_slave(pdev);
>> +			else
>> +				i2c_dw_configure_master(pdev);
>> +		}
>> +	} else
>> +		i2c_dw_configure_master(pdev);
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html