From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7EBD1EA95 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Received: from i53875a56.versanet.de ([83.135.90.86] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLJh3-00027h-O1; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:07:13 +0100 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Dragan Simic Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Kyle Copperfield Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for RK3399 Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:07:12 +0100 Message-ID: <2157455.yIU609i1g2@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <0476656a-6d3d-4662-879a-1caf0efb4d9e@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2024, 09:55:35 CET schrieb Dragan Simic: > On 2024-01-04 09:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 04/01/2024 09:50, Dragan Simic wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Just checking, is there something preventing this patch from becoming > >> accepted? I'd appreciate if you'd provide some feedback and let me > >> know > >> if there's something in the patch that needs adjusting. > > > > Merge window? Is it a fix? If not, the cutoff is around rc5-rc7, > > depending on your SoC maintainer preferences. > > Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification. It isn't a bugfix, so I'll > send the patch again during the next merge window. no need to resend. The main thing holding the patch back was xmas ;-) . But as Krzysztof wrote, the merge-window is upon us, so I'll pick this up for 6.9 . Thanks Heiko