Re: [PATCH] clk: Improve clock-indices binding documentation

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Monday 14 April 2014 19:00:40 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> 
> Improve the wording for the clock-indices binding documentation.
> Also replace "empty nodes" by "empty strings", as reported before by Sergei
> Shtylyov.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt   |    9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt index
> 700e7aac3717..f15787817d6b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
> @@ -44,10 +44,9 @@ For example:
>    clocks by index. The names should reflect the clock output signal
>    names for the device.
> 
> -clock-indices:	   If the identifyng number for the clocks in the node
> -		   is not linear from zero, then the this mapping allows
> -		   the mapping of identifiers into the clock-output-names
> -		   array.
> +clock-indices:	   If the identifying number for the clocks in the node
> +		   is not linear from zero, then this allows the mapping of
> +		   identifiers into the clock-output-names array.
> 
>  For example, if we have two clocks <&oscillator 1> and <&oscillator 3>:
> 
> @@ -58,7 +57,7 @@ For example, if we have two clocks <&oscillator 1> and
> <&oscillator 3>: clock-output-names = "clka", "clkb";
>  	}
> 
> -	This ensures we do not have any empty nodes in clock-output-names
> +	This ensures we do not have any empty strings in clock-output-names
> 
> 
>  ==Clock consumers==

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart