From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Exynos: Add generic compatible string Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:48:04 +0100 Message-ID: <2200834.G3JJLYQl5i@wuerfel> References: <1392809645-631-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <53075239.4010603@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53075239.4010603@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Sachin Kamat , linux-arm-kernel , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , Ian Campbell , Rob Herring , Grant Likely , linux-samsung-soc , Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go ahead with the > > following steps as an initial approach: > > 1. Have a common machine file for both exynos4 and 5 files, mach-exynos-dt.c. > > 2. Introduce a generic compatible string "samsung,exynos". > > 3. Append this to the compatible property list for existing boards. > > > > If this plan looks OK, I can send across patches doing this. > > > > Looks good. I would also merge common.c with this resulting > mach-exynos-dt.c, as it would be the only user of the code there. Sounds good. While the naming is not important, I would just call the file 'exynos.c', in line with some of the other platforms we have. Both the 'mach-' and the '-dt' part of the file name are redundant. Alternatively, you could merge it all into common.c. Arnd