From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: dts: rockchip: Add rk3288-veyron-jerry rev 10-15 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:25:20 +0100 Message-ID: <22847786.E0k6fS2MZ4@phil> References: <20190322195924.70448-1-dianders@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190322195924.70448-1-dianders@chromium.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Douglas Anderson Cc: mka@chromium.org, ryandcase@chromium.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tomeu Vizoso , Alexis Ballier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Robin Murphy , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Akash Gajjar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 22. März 2019, 20:59:23 CET schrieb Douglas Anderson: > As far as I can tell/remember rev10 was originally created to support > making a SKU of jerry that had a different LCD. rev11-rev15 were > added to give some wiggle room for future builds. Downstream has a > separate device tree for rev10-rev15 (compared to rev3-rev7) with the > expectation that differences relating to the LCD would be accounted > for there but nothing was ever added to the rev10-rev15 making it > identical to the rev3-rev7 one. > > It's likely nothing actually shipped with rev10-rev15 but they are > listed in the downstream kernel's device tree and it seems like it > should add a little safety if we match them here just in case > something actually shipped with one of these revisions and that device > will break if we don't claim support. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson applied both for 5.2 Thanks Heiko