public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
Cc: <vigneshr@ti.com>, <kristo@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	<bb@ti.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and wakeup R5FSS nodes
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:17:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2291204f-97d5-4887-b68f-8789fe85f838@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240124172151.ngxaq6k5tnvsx4jr@proud>

Hi Nishanth,

On 24/01/24 22:51, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11:26-20240124, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
>> Hello Vaishnav,
>>
>> On 21/01/24 19:10, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
>>> K3 Remoteproc R5 driver requires reserved memory carveouts and
>>> mailbox configuration to instantiate the cores successfully.
>>> Since this is a board level dependency, keep the R5 subsytem
>>> disabled at SoC dtsi, otherwise it results in probe errors like
>>> below during AM62P SK boot:
>>>
>>> r5fss@79000000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
>>> r5fss@79000000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
>>> r5fss@78000000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
>>> r5fss@78000000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
>>>
>>> Fixes: b5080c7c1f7e ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add nodes for more IPs")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi    | 2 ++
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi | 1 +
>>>    2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
>>> index c4b0b91d70cf..14eb9ba836d3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
>>> @@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ mcu_r5fss0: r5fss@79000000 {
>>>    		ranges = <0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x8000>,
>>>    			 <0x79020000 0x00 0x79020000 0x8000>;
>>>    		power-domains = <&k3_pds 7 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>>> +		status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>>    		mcu_r5fss0_core0: r5f@79000000 {
>>>    			compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";
>>>    			reg = <0x79000000 0x00008000>,
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
>>> index 19f42b39394e..10a7059b2d9b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
>>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ wkup_r5fss0: r5fss@78000000 {
>>>    		ranges = <0x78000000 0x00 0x78000000 0x8000>,
>>>    			 <0x78100000 0x00 0x78100000 0x8000>;
>>>    		power-domains = <&k3_pds 119 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>>> +		status = "disabled";
> 
> Is there a reason for difference in white space addition?
> 

For mcu_r5fss0_core0 child node there was no blank line as per the 
recommended coding style : 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst#n124

So I added a newline there and wkup_r5fss0 already had it correct, since 
the change was trivial it was not mentioned in commit message.

Thanks and Regards,
Vaishnav

>>>    		wkup_r5fss0_core0: r5f@78000000 {
>>>    			compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";
>>
>> Thanks.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-21 13:40 [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and wakeup R5FSS nodes Vaishnav Achath
2024-01-24  5:56 ` Jayesh Choudhary
2024-01-24 17:21   ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-25  5:47     ` Vaishnav Achath [this message]
2024-01-25 13:43       ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-25 14:04       ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-26  7:56 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-02-06  8:40 ` Vignesh Raghavendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2291204f-97d5-4887-b68f-8789fe85f838@ti.com \
    --to=vaishnav.a@ti.com \
    --cc=bb@ti.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j-choudhary@ti.com \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox