[PATCH 0/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add missing gce-client-reg properties to mt8192 and mt8195

[PATCH 0/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add missing gce-client-reg properties to mt8192 and mt8195

[Nícolas F. R. A. Prado]

This series adds the gce-client-reg properties to the nodes where it was
missing in order to avoid "error -2 can't parse gce-client-reg property"
errors and possibly improve the performance. The separation of the
commits was done in order for each one to have a single Fixes tag and
therefore be more easily backported.

Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
---
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (4):
      arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex
      arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys
      arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex
      arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex1

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 2ae0a045e6814c8c1d676d6153c605a65746aa29
change-id: 20240229-gce-client-reg-add-missing-mt8192-95-d05c0659c8ca

Best regards,
-- 
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>

[PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex

[Nícolas F. R. A. Prado]

Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the mutex node to
allow it to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't parse gce-client-reg
property" error from being printed and should result in better
performance.

Fixes: b4b75bac952b ("arm64: dts: mt8192: Add display nodes")
Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
index 05e401670bce..84cbdf6e9eb0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
@@ -1464,6 +1464,7 @@ mutex: mutex@14001000 {
 			reg = <0 0x14001000 0 0x1000>;
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 252 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
 			clocks = <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_MUTEX0>;
+			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce SUBSYS_1400XXXX 0x1000 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,gce-events = <CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_STREAM_DONE_ENG_EVENT_0>,
 					      <CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_STREAM_DONE_ENG_EVENT_1>;
 			power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP>;

-- 
2.44.0

[PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys

[Nícolas F. R. A. Prado]

Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
result in better performance.

Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
index ea6dc220e1cc..f2912e1a0e49 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
@@ -2028,6 +2028,7 @@ vppsys0: syscon@14000000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys0", "syscon";
 			reg = <0 0x14000000 0 0x1000>;
 			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_1400XXXX 0 0x1000>;
 		};
 
 		dma-controller@14001000 {
@@ -2251,6 +2252,7 @@ vppsys1: syscon@14f00000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys1", "syscon";
 			reg = <0 0x14f00000 0 0x1000>;
 			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_14f0XXXX 0 0x1000>;
 		};
 
 		mutex@14f01000 {
@@ -3080,6 +3082,7 @@ vdosys0: syscon@1c01a000 {
 			reg = <0 0x1c01a000 0 0x1000>;
 			mboxes = <&gce0 0 CMDQ_THR_PRIO_4>;
 			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c01XXXX 0xa000 0x1000>;
 		};
 
 

-- 
2.44.0

[PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex

[Nícolas F. R. A. Prado]

Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the mutex node to
allow it to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't parse gce-client-reg
property" error from being printed and should result in better
performance.

Fixes: b852ee68fd72 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add display node for vdosys0")
Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
index f2912e1a0e49..fd074103979c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
@@ -3264,6 +3264,7 @@ mutex: mutex@1c016000 {
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 658 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
 			power-domains = <&spm MT8195_POWER_DOMAIN_VDOSYS0>;
 			clocks = <&vdosys0 CLK_VDO0_DISP_MUTEX0>;
+			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c01XXXX 0x6000 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,gce-events = <CMDQ_EVENT_VDO0_DISP_STREAM_DONE_0>;
 		};
 

-- 
2.44.0

[PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex1

[Nícolas F. R. A. Prado]

Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the mutex1 node to
allow it to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't parse gce-client-reg
property" error from being printed and should result in better
performance.

Fixes: 92d2c23dc269 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: add display node for vdosys1")
Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
index fd074103979c..5d8b68f86ce4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
@@ -3335,6 +3335,7 @@ mutex1: mutex@1c101000 {
 			power-domains = <&spm MT8195_POWER_DOMAIN_VDOSYS1>;
 			clocks = <&vdosys1 CLK_VDO1_DISP_MUTEX>;
 			clock-names = "vdo1_mutex";
+			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c10XXXX 0x1000 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,gce-events = <CMDQ_EVENT_VDO1_STREAM_DONE_ENG_0>;
 		};
 

-- 
2.44.0

Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the mutex node to
> allow it to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't parse gce-client-reg
> property" error from being printed and should result in better
> performance.
> 
> Fixes: b4b75bac952b ("arm64: dts: mt8192: Add display nodes")
> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
> vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
> parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
> result in better performance.
> 
> Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>

Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one?

It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only
generates commit noise for no practical reason imo.

arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex

Thanks,
Angelo

> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> index ea6dc220e1cc..f2912e1a0e49 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
> @@ -2028,6 +2028,7 @@ vppsys0: syscon@14000000 {
>   			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys0", "syscon";
>   			reg = <0 0x14000000 0 0x1000>;
>   			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_1400XXXX 0 0x1000>;
>   		};
>   
>   		dma-controller@14001000 {
> @@ -2251,6 +2252,7 @@ vppsys1: syscon@14f00000 {
>   			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys1", "syscon";
>   			reg = <0 0x14f00000 0 0x1000>;
>   			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_14f0XXXX 0 0x1000>;
>   		};
>   
>   		mutex@14f01000 {
> @@ -3080,6 +3082,7 @@ vdosys0: syscon@1c01a000 {
>   			reg = <0 0x1c01a000 0 0x1000>;
>   			mboxes = <&gce0 0 CMDQ_THR_PRIO_4>;
>   			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c01XXXX 0xa000 0x1000>;
>   		};
>   
>   
> 

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys

[Nícolas F. R. A. Prado]

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:50:31AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> > Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
> > vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
> > parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
> > result in better performance.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
> > Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
> 
> Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one?
> 
> It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only
> generates commit noise for no practical reason imo.
> 
> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex

I split them like this so that each has its own fixes tag and can all be easily
backported (as mentioned in the cover letter). That said, the commits fixed in 2
and 3 both landed in v6.1-rc1, so they could be squashed and still easily
backported. But the commit fixed in patch 4 only landed in v6.4-rc1, so if we
squash them all together, the first two won't be backported to v6.1.

Let me know how you want to proceed.

Thanks,
Nícolas

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 01/03/24 15:39, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:50:31AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
>>> Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
>>> vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
>>> parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
>>> result in better performance.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
>>> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
>>
>> Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one?
>>
>> It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only
>> generates commit noise for no practical reason imo.
>>
>> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex
> 
> I split them like this so that each has its own fixes tag and can all be easily
> backported (as mentioned in the cover letter). That said, the commits fixed in 2
> and 3 both landed in v6.1-rc1, so they could be squashed and still easily
> backported. But the commit fixed in patch 4 only landed in v6.4-rc1, so if we
> squash them all together, the first two won't be backported to v6.1.
> 
> Let me know how you want to proceed.
> 

Oh, I'm sorry I didn't notice that. Ignore my previous comment then, I'll take
those for the next fixes round as-is.

Cheers,
Angelo

Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add missing gce-client-reg properties to mt8192 and mt8195

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:44:27 -0500, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> This series adds the gce-client-reg properties to the nodes where it was
> missing in order to avoid "error -2 can't parse gce-client-reg property"
> errors and possibly improve the performance. The separation of the
> commits was done in order for each one to have a single Fixes tag and
> therefore be more easily backported.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to v6.9-fixes/dts64, thanks!

[1/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex
      commit: 00bcc8810d9dd69d3899a4189e2f3964f263a600
[2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys
      commit: 96b0c1528ef41fe754f5d1378b1db6c098a2e33f
[3/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex
      commit: 3b129949184a1251e6a42db714f6d68b75fabedd
[4/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to mutex1
      commit: 58f126296c3c52d02bf3fad1f68c331d718c4a9b

Cheers,
Angelo