From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] ACPI: Allow drivers to match using Device Tree compatible property Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:19:17 +0200 Message-ID: <23193541.xRyL2PmlA9@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <2660541.BycO7TFnA2@vostro.rjw.lan> <3167500.xrhugPHshV@vostro.rjw.lan> <20141020140501.D10A5C40982@trevor.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141020140501.D10A5C40982@trevor.secretlab.ca> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Arnd Bergmann , Mika Westerberg , ACPI Devel Maling List , Aaron Lu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Dmitry Torokhov , Bryan Wu , Darren Hart , Mark Rutland List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday, October 20, 2014 04:05:01 PM Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:05:59 +0200 > , "Rafael J. Wysocki" > wrote: > > From: Mika Westerberg > > > > We have lots of existing Device Tree enabled drivers and allocating > > separate _HID for each is not feasible. Instead we allocate special _HID > > "PRP0001" that means that the match should be done using Device Tree > > compatible property using driver's .of_match_table instead if the driver > > is missing .acpi_match_table. > > (Not a critique of this patch, but merely a helpful comment; my previous > ack remains intact) :-) > > It would be useful for the code to point at some document that describes > the semantics of the PRP0001 binding. Well, we need to create that document in the first place. :-) I'd prefer to wait with that until the thing settles, however. Rafael