From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for Freescale i.MX GPC Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:10:03 +0100 Message-ID: <2328803.HhaG6blXIR@wuerfel> References: <1392737687-25003-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <1392737687-25003-2-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1392737687-25003-2-git-send-email-p.zabel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Philipp Zabel , Shawn Guo , Mark Rutland , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 18 February 2014 16:34:41 Philipp Zabel wrote: > + > +Example of a device that is part of a power domain: > + > + vpu: vpu@02040000 { > + reg = <0x02040000 0x3c000>; > + /* ... */ > + fsl,power-domain = <&pd_pu>; > + /* ... */ > + }; > + I'm really not too happy about platforms starting to add random bindings for power domains. Unfortunately I didn't catch exynos doing this first, but I don't want to see another platform like that. Can we please come up with a proper generic power domain binding first and then add platform specific users? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html