From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Xing.Xu@amlogic.com,
victor.wan@amlogic.com, khilman@baylibre.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, carlo@caione.org,
jerry.cao@amlogic.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: display: add Amlogic Meson DRM Bindings
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:37:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2350540.yAeGFdYPK2@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f32e3bd-531b-0be7-8579-3af52469c421@baylibre.com>
Hi Neil,
On Monday 28 Nov 2016 10:23:43 Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 09:33 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 25 Nov 2016 17:03:11 Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> .../bindings/display/meson/meson-drm.txt | 134 +++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644
> >>
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/meson/meson-drm.txt
> >>
> >> diff --git
> >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/meson/meson-drm.txt
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/meson/meson-drm.txt new file
> >> mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..89c1b5f
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/meson/meson-drm.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
> >> +Amlogic Meson Display Controller
> >> +================================
> >> +
> >> +The Amlogic Meson Display controller is composed of several components
> >> +that are going to be documented below:
> >> +
> >> +DMC|---------------VPU (Video Processing Unit)------------|------
> >> HHI------|
> >> + | vd1 _______ _____________ _____________ |
> >> |
> >> +D |-------| |----| | | | | HDMI PLL
> >> |
> >> +D | vd2 | VIU | | Video Post | | Video Encs |<---|-----VCLK
> >> |
> >> +R |-------| |----| Processing | | | |
> >> |
> >> + | osd2 | | | |---| Enci ------|----|-----
> >> VDAC------|
> >> +R |-------| CSC |----| Scalers | | Encp ------|----|----HDMI-
> >> TX----|
> >> +A | osd1 | | | Blenders | |
> >> Encl-------|----|---------------|
> >> +M |-------|______|----|____________| |____________| |
> >> |
> >> +___|______________________________________________________|____________
> >> ___|
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +VIU: Video Input Unit
> >> +---------------------
> >> +
> >> +The Video Input Unit is in charge of the pixel scanout from the DDR
> >> memory.
> >> +It fetches the frames addresses, stride and parameters from the "Canvas"
> >> memory.
> >> +This part is also in charge of the CSC (Colorspace Conversion).
> >> +It can handle 2 OSD Planes and 2 Video Planes.
> >> +
> >> +VPP: Video Processing Unit
> >
> > Do you mean "Video Post Processing" ? In your diagram above Video
> > Processing Unit is abbreviated VPU and covers the VIU, VPP and encoders.
>
> Exact, I meant VPP here.
>
> >> +--------------------------
> >> +
> >> +The Video Processing Unit is in charge if the scaling and blending of
> >> the
> >> +various planes into a single pixel stream.
> >> +There is a special "pre-blending" used by the video planes with a
> >> dedicated
> >> +scaler and a "post-blending" to merge with the OSD Planes.
> >> +The OSD planes also have a dedicated scaler for one of the OSD.
> >> +
> >> +VENC: Video Encoders
> >> +--------------------
> >> +
> >> +The VENC is composed of the multiple pixel encoders :
> >> + - ENCI : Interlace Video encoder for CVBS and Interlace HDMI
> >> + - ENCP : Progressive Video Encoder for HDMI
> >> + - ENCL : LCD LVDS Encoder
> >> +The VENC Unit gets a Pixel Clocks (VCLK) from a dedicated HDMI PLL and
> >> clock
> >> +tree and provides the scanout clock to the VPP and VIU.
> >> +The ENCI is connected to a single VDAC for Composite Output.
> >> +The ENCI and ENCP are connected to an on-chip HDMI Transceiver.
> >> +
> >> +Device Tree Bindings:
> >> +---------------------
> >> +
> >> +VPU: Video Processing Unit
> >> +--------------------------
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> + - compatible: value should be different for each SoC family as :
> >> + - GXBB (S905) : "amlogic,meson-gxbb-vpu"
> >> + - GXL (S905X, S905D) : "amlogic,meson-gxl-vpu"
> >> + - GXM (S912) : "amlogic,meson-gxm-vpu"
> >> + followed by the common "amlogic,meson-gx-vpu"
> >> + - reg: base address and size of he following memory-mapped regions :
> >> + - vpu
> >> + - hhi
> >> + - dmc
> >> + - reg-names: should contain the names of the previous memory regions
> >> + - interrupts: should contain the VENC Vsync interrupt number
> >> +
> >> +- ports: A ports node with endpoint definitions as defined in
> >> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt. The
> >> + second port should be the output endpoints for VENC connectors.
> >> +
> >> +VENC CBVS Output
> >> +----------------------
> >> +
> >> +The VENC can output Composite/CVBS output via a decicated VDAC.
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> + - compatible: value must be one of:
> >> + - compatible: value should be different for each SoC family as :
> > One of those two lines is redundant.
>
> Will fix.
>
> >> + - GXBB (S905) : "amlogic,meson-gxbb-venc-cvbs"
> >> + - GXL (S905X, S905D) : "amlogic,meson-gxl-venc-cvbs"
> >> + - GXM (S912) : "amlogic,meson-gxm-venc-cvbs"
> >> + followed by the common "amlogic,meson-gx-venc-cvbs"
> >> +
> >
> > No registers ? Are the encoders registers part of the VPU register space,
> > intertwined in a way that they can't be specified separately here ?
>
> Exact, all the video registers on the Amlogic SoC are part of a long history
> of fixup/enhance from very old SoCs, it's quite hard to distinguish a Venc
> registers array since they are mixed with the multiple encoders
> registers...
In that case is there really a reason to model the encoders as separate nodes
in DT ?
> The only separate registers are the VDAC and HDMI PHY, I may move them to
> these separate nodes since they are part of the HHI register space.
>
> It is a problem if I move them in the next release ? Next release will
> certainly have HDMI support, and will have these refactorings.
Given that DT bindings are considered as a stable ABI, I'm afraid it's an
issue.
> >> +- ports: A ports node with endpoint definitions as defined in
> >> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt. The
> >> + first port should be the input endpoints, connected ot the VPU node.
> >> +
> >> +Example:
> >> +
> >> +venc_cvbs: venc-cvbs {
> >> + compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxbb-venc-cvbs";
> >> + status = "okay";
> >> +
> >> + ports {
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> + enc_cvbs_in: port@0 {
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> + reg = <0>;
> >> +
> >> + venc_cvbs_in_vpu: endpoint@0 {
> >> + reg = <0>;
> >> + remote-endpoint = <&vpu_out_venc_cvbs>;
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +vpu: vpu@d0100000 {
> >> + compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxbb-vpu";
> >> + reg = <0x0 0xd0100000 0x0 0x100000>,
> >> + <0x0 0xc883c000 0x0 0x1000>,
> >> + <0x0 0xc8838000 0x0 0x1000>;
> >> + reg-names = "base", "hhi", "dmc";
> >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> >> +
> >> + ports {
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> + vpu_out: port@1 {
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> + reg = <1>;
> >> +
> >> + vpu_out_venc_cvbs: endpoint@0 {
> >> + reg = <0>;
> >> + remote-endpoint = <&venc_cvbs_in_vpu>;
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> +};
>
> Thanks for the review !
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1480089791-12517-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com>
2016-11-25 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM64: dts: meson-gx: Add Graphic Controller nodes Neil Armstrong
[not found] ` <1480089791-12517-1-git-send-email-narmstrong-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-25 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: display: add Amlogic Meson DRM Bindings Neil Armstrong
2016-11-28 8:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-28 9:23 ` Neil Armstrong
2016-11-28 9:37 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-11-28 9:56 ` Neil Armstrong
[not found] ` <534f6d99-a579-27b6-fb54-48584cd1c7aa-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-28 10:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-28 10:25 ` Neil Armstrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2350540.yAeGFdYPK2@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=Xing.Xu@amlogic.com \
--cc=carlo@caione.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jerry.cao@amlogic.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=victor.wan@amlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).