From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Daniel Kukieła" <daniel@kukiela.pl>,
"Sven Rademakers" <sven.rademakers@gmail.com>,
"Joshua Riek" <jjriek@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe pinctrls to Turing RK1
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2023 12:41:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2369165.PYKUYFuaPT@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d38540c5-79a8-0582-87b9-0e99bf3044d5@gmail.com>
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2023, 19:26:40 CET schrieb Sam Edwards:
>
> On 12/6/23 07:55, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2023, 21:28:59 CET schrieb Sam Edwards:
> >> The RK3588 PCIe 3.0 controller seems to have unpredictable behavior when
> >> no CLKREQ/PERST/WAKE pins are configured in the pinmux. In particular, it
> >> will sometimes (varying between specific RK3588 chips, not over time) shut
> >> off the DBI block, and reads to this range will instead stall
> >> indefinitely.
> >>
> >> When this happens, it will prevent Linux from booting altogether. The
> >> PCIe driver will stall the CPU core once it attempts to read the version
> >> information from the DBI range.
> >>
> >> Fix this boot hang by adding the correct pinctrl configuration to the
> >> PCIe 3.0 device node, which is the proper thing to do anyway. While
> >> we're at it, also add the necessary configuration to the PCIe 2.0 node,
> >> which may or may not fix the equivalent problem over there -- but is the
> >> proper thing to do anyway. :)
> >>
> >> Fixes: 2806a69f3fef6 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 SoM support")
> >> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi | 14 ++------------
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
> >> index 9570b34aca2e..129f14dbd42f 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dtsi
> >> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ rgmii_phy: ethernet-phy@1 {
> >> &pcie2x1l1 {
> >> linux,pci-domain = <1>;
> >> pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> - pinctrl-0 = <&pcie2_reset>;
> >> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie30x1m1_pins>;
> >> reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> status = "okay";
> >> };
> >> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ &pcie30phy {
> >> &pcie3x4 {
> >> linux,pci-domain = <0>;
> >> pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> - pinctrl-0 = <&pcie3_reset>;
> >> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie30x4m1_pins>;
>
> Hi Heiko,
>
> >
> > also, why are you throwing out the pinctrl for the reset pin.
> > That seems not related to the regular pins and you could instead just do
> >
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie30x4m1_pins>, <&pcie3_reset>;
>
> The pcie30x4m1_pins def does include pinmuxing `4 RK_PB6` to the DW
> controller already. The v2 patch should probably instead remove the
> reset-gpios property, since an out-of-band GPIO reset is not needed when
> the controller can do it.
yep, also because of the reset-gpios the pinctrl/gpio driver will mux the
pin to gpio function even though the pinctrl would've set if the pcie-
function before that.
So I'm really in favor of not mixing the two concepts :-)
When setting the pins, the reset-gpio should be gone and vice-versa.
> I'm still looking into the story with the PCIe 2.0 pins, since 2.0x1's
> PERST# is definitely 4A2. I'll ask around and try to find out where the
> corresponding CLKREQ# is going.
Yeah, I tried reading up in the TRM but it was really hard following
which pin-group actually goes to which controller and the naming
definitly does not help :-) .
Heiko
> >> reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie30>;
> >> status = "okay";
> >> @@ -245,17 +245,7 @@ hym8563_int: hym8563-int {
> >> };
> >> };
> >>
> >> - pcie2 {
> >> - pcie2_reset: pcie2-reset {
> >> - rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PA2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> >> - };
> >> - };
> >> -
> >> pcie3 {
> >> - pcie3_reset: pcie3-reset {
> >> - rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PB6 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> >> - };
> >> -
> >> vcc3v3_pcie30_en: pcie3-reg {
> >> rockchip,pins = <2 RK_PC5 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> >> };
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 20:28 [RESEND PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe pinctrls to Turing RK1 Sam Edwards
2023-12-06 9:35 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-12-06 19:42 ` Sam Edwards
2023-12-06 14:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-12-06 18:26 ` Sam Edwards
2023-12-07 11:41 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2369165.PYKUYFuaPT@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=cfsworks@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@kukiela.pl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jjriek@verizon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sven.rademakers@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).