From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Brunner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] drivers: net: cpsw: phy-handle fixes Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:35:37 +0100 Message-ID: <2375419.xULY4PYlNl@localhost> References: <1450830994-5450-1-git-send-email-drivshin.allworx@gmail.com> <20151223.120425.2005941258192616350.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151223.120425.2005941258192616350.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: drivshin.allworx@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, hs@denx.de, mugunthanvnm@ti.com, kernel@iktek.de, dtrautmann@ibhsoftec-sps.de List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 23 December 2015 12:04:25 David Miller wrote: > From: "David Rivshin (Allworx)" > Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 19:36:31 -0500 > > > Testing by anyone who has real hardware using phy-handle or dual_emac > > with fixed-link would be appreciated. > > I'm going to wait for such testing before applying this series. > > Thanks. Successfully tested the following 3 configurations. 1. emac0 with phy_id and emac1 with fixed phy 2. emac0 with phy-handle and emac1 with fixed phy 3. emac0 with fixed phy and emac1 with fixed phy Below are the affected DT nodes, with one cpsw_emac0 node choosen for each test. &cpsw_emac0 { phy_id = <&davinci_mdio>, <5>; phy-mode = "mii"; dual_emac_res_vlan = <4093>; }; &cpsw_emac0 { phy-mode = "mii"; dual_emac_res_vlan = <4093>; phy-handle = <&phy0>; }; &cpsw_emac0 { phy-mode = "mii"; dual_emac_res_vlan = <4093>; fixed-link { speed = <100>; full-duplex; }; }; &cpsw_emac1 { dual_emac_res_vlan = <4094>; phy-mode = "mii"; fixed-link { speed = <100>; full-duplex; }; }; &davinci_mdio { status = "okay"; phy0: ethernet-phy@0 { reg = <5>; }; }; ps: I don't have access to the board for the next 2 weeks.