From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:25:38 +0900 Message-ID: <241b01cd8c7e$8b07bb00$a1173100$%kim@samsung.com> References: <201208282355.44268.heiko@sntech.de> <503D4FB1.1020206@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Linus Walleij' Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?'Heiko_St=FCbner'?= , 'Linus Walleij' , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, 'Rob Herring' , 'linux-samsung-soc' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Linus Walleij wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Kukjin Kim w= rote: > > On 08/28/12 14:55, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > >> > >> Until now the Exynos-SoC was the only Samsung-SoC supporting the G= PIOs > >> via the device tree. This patch implements dt-support for the > >> s3c24xx arches. > >> > >> The controllers contain only 3 cells, as the underlying gpio contr= oller > >> does not support controlling the drive strength on a gpio level. > >> > >> Tested with the gpio-keys driver on a s3c2416 based machine. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Abraham > > > > > > Yeah, looks good to me... > > > > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim >=20 > OK are you taking this into the Samsung tree or shall I take care of = it? >=20 Hmm...yeah, Samsung tree is better. Applied with your ack :-) Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.