Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform

[Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com>]

On 11/23/23 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/11/2023 10:39, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
>
>> ok i will use '
>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..9876ee0dd1e4
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
>>> Any particular reason why do you need 3-clause BSD? Checkpatch asks for
>>> different one, because that one clause is just annoying.
>> Yes, the same file can also be used in other components, such as
>> TF-A/OPTEE, and can therefore have a dual licence.
> That's not what I asked. I asked: why do you choose different dual
> license then we ask for (as expressed in checkpatch).


Sorry for the delay, i checked with our licensing experts and we 
concluded that there was no particular reason to use BSD-3-clause 
instead of the BSD-2-clause model.


I'm sending back a new version under GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause 
license model.

Best Regards

Gabriel


> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>