From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=foss.st.com header.i=@foss.st.com header.b="Ujfjmbei" Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (mx07-00178001.pphosted.com [185.132.182.106]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C60793; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 01:35:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0241204.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.17.1.22/8.17.1.22) with ESMTP id 3AS9Eds7030939; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:35:29 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h= message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references:from :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= selector1; bh=GmAQ+P5wdnfnY6QoWde8H7NjTBmiUXrbb0+PZP5EH5k=; b=Uj fjmbeiCLPmw07Q0ANonxjPqA8FgITc+qjN3Rn9ZShXWUbTjSb3Qu+A8h8RqEJULB CHLePlWG+7cVQ0wsAEyqTwv0yNtr8s8acnGAPHW9VqnFWpb5HmZGO03/GfpS8Vud qDwu1mnb3K91F/hTu/oGuj2yg5cdw6JdGyzwu550gNeJkH7splWwFQIFgLq9jjok nfcI1iHomAwWDMrM1B4yONWaIyKy+rEXHo8+2btTtx68Wvy+zaxUga9H1wkDh1wF hcSZ0aQpXnvfIAL+pPq12SbhnjdOWaYZfADnWwFq4VLaIHVw+yiU2OEHK4C4Qd2U 6Xg7nk0Nnc+sSqDWTGaw== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3uk951up0s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:35:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 7611810002A; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:35:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (shfdag1node1.st.com [10.75.129.69]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 63A3E21BF7D; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:35:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.201.21.240] (10.201.21.240) by SHFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:35:26 +0100 Message-ID: <25e18413-e23f-444d-82fe-d36cba662638@foss.st.com> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:35:25 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Philipp Zabel CC: , , , , References: <20231122132156.158103-1-gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com> <20231122132156.158103-4-gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com> <90664758-9273-4ed7-b711-0abe45b4efed@linaro.org> <31940ab7-4b39-4859-b482-5c236a263862@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Gabriel FERNANDEZ In-Reply-To: <31940ab7-4b39-4859-b482-5c236a263862@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: EQNCAS1NODE4.st.com (10.75.129.82) To SHFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.69) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.987,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-11-28_08,2023-11-27_01,2023-05-22_02 On 11/23/23 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/11/2023 10:39, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote: > >> ok i will use ' >>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 000000000000..9876ee0dd1e4 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@ >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */ >>> Any particular reason why do you need 3-clause BSD? Checkpatch asks for >>> different one, because that one clause is just annoying. >> Yes, the same file can also be used in other components, such as >> TF-A/OPTEE, and can therefore have a dual licence. > That's not what I asked. I asked: why do you choose different dual > license then we ask for (as expressed in checkpatch). Sorry for the delay, i checked with our licensing experts and we concluded that there was no particular reason to use BSD-3-clause instead of the BSD-2-clause model. I'm sending back a new version under GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause license model. Best Regards Gabriel > Best regards, > Krzysztof >