From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59338C43334 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231812AbiGZJf6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 05:35:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39584 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231765AbiGZJf6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 05:35:58 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50DDC267 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 02:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q7so440200ljp.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 02:35:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MZNymunIwr5s0HT+N0W6RIskoSi2SJWBvUz9MpgZG58=; b=SNRiT4UdvD6F/JjIUs8flwpEd8o111zMH9eGEXvTTu03KoNLTKFfOqakN3prHRAx59 qOtAvnfxJ6E7LrlHs1+J67JCyAEUXQ9Slzz8RKky9puBdMKQtbwS0M+QPCgZbBZDSoN1 05j3U6LfeMUUmDof9sEdKdvJdxej36dVJMX2AIjbRcU45PMMyZKuoEENC9N0e4hlPFNb 7Hqsguow2Z27wXNaHbY1814HbJp9504xAuo0s8H4t/46LDIMjp62Rf3fDqVzFOFDJQ2t 1rvpI/LhwrZqAFJdHLY0JgBm7selOJZ+4nhqG6MHmAi9Qv+30y0NSqpXXKXi+2IG0jFi WQzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MZNymunIwr5s0HT+N0W6RIskoSi2SJWBvUz9MpgZG58=; b=6YSsZb7dM+v2SD8j2sYwKXwd8eBasZ3wLC/fZjYdj6oY5lYqjZQ9MF+I+0ZwZJkgLx NpG6ampL9EungkZMQYEAGCKosNq/vZsmkqEXLl/D2MOKkv72Lqt3N/gDo/oIqF0JWLpP v+22epK3LoEQEAkGW4chwmRQ5DqtapLY1e+3BYfSCTT9fifXvuPOHo+o/WvbuqPP9n1H rvuzh4ldY3GqL21TEI/s7qP4rC9l13r1cD3kzbZthc4mZHVm7/BPnX+kr5KhdrpJyUIv Ox2Vbo4t2IkExMm8yLwuiXHehFLqWxWDcsmYQWpRS7nrjrggpcRs5xbOsmK09IhXkktB yNTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8St846FjHSsUWIW/00oEQPpzpGPxkyyiROVEWMnBb2SmMEHUci DSTCy0Jqn0npUlUIIEJuqV3Yyv9fqIy0BQxU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vjtcZBhpUzmUUwBgrctsW/ueajtnWknKkOsqnFCkRfGGSXQSnNzMwB0fadIqycXeQzemUy1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a989:0:b0:25d:5d7c:f3e7 with SMTP id x9-20020a2ea989000000b0025d5d7cf3e7mr5887914ljq.392.1658828154712; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 02:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.197] (78-26-46-173.network.trollfjord.no. [78.26.46.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9-20020a2e94c9000000b0025de60d6c42sm3107406ljh.21.2022.07.26.02.35.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 02:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <26aa352e-d39c-1784-e5c3-9e90d25d8ab5@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:35:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: Align fsl,pins with dtschema Content-Language: en-US To: Peng Fan , robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, Fabio Estevam , Lucas Stach , Sascha Hauer , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, abelvesa@kernel.org, Marek Vasut References: <1c6c9750-571c-bfd9-8804-4f16d691c480@oss.nxp.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <1c6c9750-571c-bfd9-8804-4f16d691c480@oss.nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 23/07/2022 14:15, Peng Fan wrote: > All, > > I am thinking whether we need to modify the fsl,pins as below. Because > fsl,pins use uint32-matrix, so just wanna know we should do this update. > > Anyway there is NO dtbs check warning. If we update fsl,pins, there are > bunches of dts files need update. Do you think we need to update or not? > > pinctrl_ov5640: ov5640grp { > - fsl,pins = < > - MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO07_GPIO1_IO7 0x19 > - MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO06_GPIO1_IO6 0x19 > - MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO14_CCMSRCGPCMIX_CLKO1 0x59 > - >; > + fsl,pins = > + 0x19>, > + 0x19>, > + 0x59>; > }; I believe yes, but as Rob replied, the dtschema has trouble matching the different fsl,pins, if I understood correctly. Best regards, Krzysztof