From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:51:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2717087.4cxEA98ZJk@wuerfel> References: <1448636523-20503-1-git-send-email-bharatku@xilinx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1448636523-20503-1-git-send-email-bharatku@xilinx.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada , robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, michals@xilinx.com, sorenb@xilinx.com, bhelgaas@google.com, tinamdar@apm.com, treding@nvidia.com, rjui@broadcom.com, Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com, m-karicheri2@ti.com, hauke@hauke-m.de, marc.zyngier@arm.com, dhdang@apm.com, sbranden@broadcom.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bharat Kumar Gogada , Ravi Kiran Gummaluri List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 27 November 2015 20:32:03 Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > + do { > + err = nwl_pcie_link_up(pcie, PHY_RDY_LINKUP); > + if (err != 1) { > + check_link_up++; > + if (check_link_up > LINKUP_ITER_CHECK) > + return -ENODEV; > + mdelay(1000); > + } > + } while (!err); mdelay(1000) is not something anyone should do. Why can't you call a sleeping function here? Arnd