From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:63454 "EHLO mail-bk0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753574Ab3HQPNZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:13:25 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mx11so940950bkb.4 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:13:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF CPU DAI driver Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:13:20 +0200 Message-ID: <2782793.dUculLxO6S@flatron> In-Reply-To: <20130817150002.GU26614@pengutronix.de> References: <137675716.iLf1T1CVZo@flatron> <20130817150002.GU26614@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Nicolin Chen , ian.campbell@citrix.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, galak@codeaurora.org, broonie@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, timur@tabi.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, shawn.guo@linaro.org, festevam@gmail.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, mark.rutland@arm.com List-ID: On Saturday 17 of August 2013 17:00:02 Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 02:26:40PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > You mean tx<0-7>. > > > > > > Also I would make this option required. Use a dummy clock for mux > > > inputs that are grounded for a specific SoC. > > > > Why do you need a dummy clock? > > > > The driver can simply try to grab all the possible clocks and discard > > those that failed, so you can just keep those grounded clocks > > unspecified. > We don't need dummy clocks. My motivation saying this that I was afraid > people try to configure the driver by skipping the clocks they don't > want from the devicetree. I'm not really sure if the same abuse couldn't be easily achieved by putting dummy clocks in place of those skipped clocks. Adding a note in binding documentation that says that all clocks that are fed to the IP shall be specified should be fine IMHO. Best regards, Tomasz