From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: bus: da8xx-syscfg: new driver Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:23:39 +0530 Message-ID: <278cac52-020f-da2f-54d7-e68d3b71eb65@ti.com> References: <1476721850-454-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> <2278105.geKhb8xoNC@avalon> <7h8ttj6jqo.fsf@baylibre.com> <1867292.F3aGJTmS2t@avalon> <7h8tti6c95.fsf@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomi Valkeinen , Kevin Hilman , Laurent Pinchart Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Mark Rutland , Peter Ujfalusi , Russell King , LKML , arm-soc , linux-drm , linux-devicetree , Jyri Sarha , David Airlie , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 21 October 2016 02:55 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 20/10/16 22:39, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> However, after our discussion on IRC, we'll respin this without the DT >> bindings at all. Next version will just use static configuration data >> in the drivers/bus driver based on SoC compatible string, since for the >> use-cases I'm aware of, the settings are boot-time only. > > If it's static boot time config, why not do it in the u-boot? Hardware initialization dependencies with boot-loader are tough to track and debug. The bootloader thats currently ships with the board may not have these settings, for example. This forces everyone to update their bootloader when shifting to mainline kernel. Thanks, Sekhar