Re: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: dwc: add reset optional

["Xuyang Dong" <dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com>]

> > > 
> > > The DesignWare PWM includes separate reset signals dedicated to each clock
> > > domain:
> > > The presetn signal resets logic in pclk domain.
> > > The timer_N_resetn signal resets logic in the timer_N_clk domain.
> > > The resets are active-low.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Xuyang Dong <dongxuyang@eswincomputing.com>
> > 
> > This commit implies that your hardware differs from existing devices,
> > I think you should add a device-specific compatible.
> > 

Hi Conor and Krzysztof,

The DesignWare PWM Databook for 2.13a says: "The DW_apb_timers includes 
separate reset signals dedicated to each clock domain". They are:
The presetn signal resets logic in pclk domain (i.e., the bus clock in DT).
The timer_N_resetn signal resets logic in the timer_N_clk domain (i.e.,
the timer clock in DT).

These reset signals are optional; it is up to the designer's 
implementation.

According to [1], the applied YAML is also based on 2.13a, so our 
hardware is the same as the existing devices. It's just that these two 
reset signals were missing from the original YAML binding.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/8bb5103d-803e-90d2-fd93-132bb2aac2d6@sifive.com/

> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml       | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml
> > > index 7523a89a1773..a8bbad0360f8 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml
> > > @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ properties:
> > >        - const: bus
> > >        - const: timer
> > >  
> > > +  resets:
> > > +    maxItems: 2
> 
> And this should really be listed with description, because order is
> fixed.
> 

The description of resets will be listed in next version.

Best regards,
Xuyang Dong