From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] of: make OF_DYNAMIC selectable independently of OF_UNITTEST
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:01:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <288e4900-c23c-56ee-5c23-9a51cd3f315e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211007000954.30621-8-zev@bewilderbeest.net>
On 10/6/21 7:09 PM, Zev Weiss wrote:
> The writable status sysfs file enabled by the 'dynamic' DT property
> requires CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC to be useful, but that shouldn't require
> dragging in CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>
> ---
> drivers/of/Kconfig | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> index 3dfeae8912df..8e0ba87db030 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> @@ -55,12 +55,14 @@ config OF_KOBJ
> # Hardly any platforms need this. It is safe to select, but only do so if you
> # need it.
> config OF_DYNAMIC
> - bool "Support for dynamic device trees" if OF_UNITTEST
> + bool "Support for dynamic device trees"
> select OF_KOBJ
> help
> On some platforms, the device tree can be manipulated at runtime.
> - While this option is selected automatically on such platforms, you
> - can enable it manually to improve device tree unit test coverage.
> + With this option enabled, device tree nodes that are marked with
> + the "dynamic" property can have their status toggled between
> + "okay" and "reserved" via sysfs. This can also be enabled to
> + increase test coverage with CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST if desired.
>
> config OF_ADDRESS
> def_bool y
>
The help message should be extended to explain the impact of enabling
OF_DYNAMIC manually (as opposed to auto selected) - it will be to
allow writes to a node's "status" property in sysfs if the node contains
a true value for the "dynamic" property.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-08 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 0:09 [PATCH 0/9] Dynamic DT device nodes Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 1/9] sysfs: add sysfs_remove_bin_file_self() function Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 5:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-07 5:58 ` Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 6:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-07 6:55 ` Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 2/9] sysfs: add growable flag to struct bin_attribute Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 3/9] lib/string: add sysfs_buf_streq() Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 4/9] of: add self parameter to __of_sysfs_remove_bin_file() Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 5:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] of: add self parameter to of_update_property() Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 5:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 6/9] of: add support for 'dynamic' DT property Zev Weiss
2021-10-08 18:51 ` Frank Rowand
2021-10-08 19:19 ` Frank Rowand
2021-10-11 13:58 ` Frank Rowand
2021-10-11 14:46 ` Frank Rowand
2021-10-11 17:35 ` Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 7/9] of: make OF_DYNAMIC selectable independently of OF_UNITTEST Zev Weiss
2021-10-08 19:01 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: document new 'dynamic' common property Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 5:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-07 6:03 ` Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 0:09 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add e3c246d4i BIOS flash device Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 2:46 ` [PATCH 0/9] Dynamic DT device nodes Florian Fainelli
2021-10-07 5:44 ` Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 7:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-07 9:05 ` Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 10:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-07 15:41 ` Zev Weiss
2021-10-07 20:03 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-08 5:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 19:43 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=288e4900-c23c-56ee-5c23-9a51cd3f315e@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=zev@bewilderbeest.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).