From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy
<subbaraman.narayanamurthy@oss.qualcomm.com>,
David Collins <david.collins@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: spmi: glymur-spmi-pmic-arb: Add compatible for Hawi
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 12:05:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2971b14a-eb0c-4c5b-bcb4-dcf8f6759a31@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401-hawi-spmi-v1-1-c40963041078@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 4/1/26 11:41 AM, Fenglin Wu wrote:
> Add a string for hawi-spmi-pmic-arb which is a compat of
> glymur-spmi-pmic-arb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
Considering the driver change wrt the failure bits, I'm on the verge of
calling these two compatible.. I suppose one can argue either way since
the end result is mostly identical
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 9:41 [PATCH 0/2] spmi: pmic-arb: Add spmi-pmic-arb support for Hawi SoC Fenglin Wu
2026-04-01 9:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: spmi: glymur-spmi-pmic-arb: Add compatible for Hawi Fenglin Wu
2026-04-01 10:05 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2026-04-02 8:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-02 8:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-01 9:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: add support for PMIC arbiter v8.5 Fenglin Wu
2026-04-01 10:03 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-04-01 11:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-04-02 4:18 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-04-17 5:24 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-04-17 23:29 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2971b14a-eb0c-4c5b-bcb4-dcf8f6759a31@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david.collins@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fenglin.wu@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kernel@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=subbaraman.narayanamurthy@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox