From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] arm: boot: dts: Add PLX Technology OX810SE dtsi Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:15:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2983013.zAxmIfv4bz@wuerfel> References: <1457005210-18485-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <1457005210-18485-15-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1457005210-18485-15-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Neil Armstrong , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 03 March 2016 12:40:07 Neil Armstrong wrote: > + > + aliases { > + serial0 = &uart0; > + serial1 = &uart1; > + serial2 = &uart2; > + serial3 = &uart3; > + gpio0 = &gpio0; > + gpio1 = &gpio1; > + }; > Please put the aliases in the per-board file and list only the devices that are actually connected (in case of uart) > + uart0: uart@200000 { Make this serial@200000, to follow the standard naming convention > + > + reset: reset-controller { > + compatible = "plxtech,nas782x-reset"; > + #reset-cells = <1>; > + }; > + > + stdclk: stdclk { > + compatible = "plxtech,ox810se-stdclk", "plxtech,nas782x-stdclk"; > + #clock-cells = <1>; > + }; > + }; Please change the compatible strings to have no 'x' wildcards in them, but instead use a specific model. Regarding the vendor prefixes, my understanding is that "ox810se" was the name of the chip from Oxford Semiconductor, while nas7820 is a product name from PLX. I think it would be logical to use "oxford" as the vendor prefix for anything with a ox810se or ox820 ID in it rather than plxtech. Note that both of them are now historic, as PLX itself got bought by Avago and they seem to be discontinuing both the PLX and Oxfor brand names. Arnd