Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: Replace deprecated extcon-usb-gpio id-gpio/vbus-gpio properties

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 20/07/2023 15:58, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 20. Juli 2023, 10:07:04 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 15/06/2023 16:58, Alexander Stein wrote:
>>> Use id-gpios and vbus-gpios instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
>>> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> #rockchip
>>> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> #mediatek
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> * Added Heiko's A-b for rockchip
>>> * Added Matthias' R-b for mediatek
>>
>> Please split patches per subsystem, so this could be applied. Or send it
>> through soc tree, but you chosen the middle way - neither per subsystem
>> nor via soc tree - so it went nowhere :(
> 
> How do you distinguish that? 

You create multiple patches per each DTS subdirectory. Then you send
entire patchset to all people (might create too many Cc addresses) or
patch-per-maintainers.

> Almost all maintainers and mailing lists from 

Yes, and they can only Ack it. If you wanted it to go via SoC, you
should have Cc Soc. Since you didn't then it was not the intention, so
only the first option is left - split per subsystem.

> get_maintainer.pl output for patch 1 are also included in the list for patch 2 
> & 3? Do you want me to send two series (1 binding patch and 2 DT patches), 
> which you will receive both of them?


Best regards,
Krzysztof