From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 705BE6FA2
	for <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:27:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77FF6C433CC;
	Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:27:15 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20201202; t=1695828436;
	bh=rgo0WOp6LMa4GMgPHGGp872nNuKcGbXX9EO3lb6/LaQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:From;
	b=L4Od6E8W4nshRKxo9Igf6yldurSD5EY0RvFkIqhnOwOGTvjq0hAgzp+STNsGJaRDU
	 d9nl0J1soonyMx8/Uqy4dQTlexdtknnFv/z3byV5odGXHKAd7Yuxr4D1HJWY5VqtrK
	 8syzuO7TwlW/nQfOU9PwPmPNFqTV4+czK9RYxDcyNefwbG8WBoowM9UG2oR2QxlEaA
	 cTbHgk5W9tRV0xVNVzDtdOQbAIhuN/X5pdd4Accy5z44iItY+hh2NzyYmyIl/Def5A
	 UUEhYMt92RtaUPtufKjGDqNjGP8IWeY9XIKuNxD58814yeRZJiF2a0ITP2iTyDYm7e
	 uT3jfQ87AIOTw==
Message-ID: <2b5dd78d308c007dfaf01eaf59fe8ec4.mripard@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 07:20:12 +0000
From: "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>
To: "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] Prevent NAND chip unevaluated properties
In-Reply-To: <20230606175246.190465-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
References: <20230606175246.190465-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Alexandre
 Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, "Brian
 Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>, "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>, "Chris
 Packham" <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>, "Christophe Kerello" <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>, "Heiko
 Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>, "Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, "Kamal
 Dasu" <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, "Liang
 Yang" <liang.yang@amlogic.com>, "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>, "Masahiro
 Yamada" <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>, "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, "Maxime
 Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>, "Michael
 Walle" <michael@walle.cc>, "Paul Cercueil" <paul@crapouillou.net>, "Pratyush
 Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>, "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>, "Rob
 Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>, "Thomas
 Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, "Tudor Ambarus" <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>, "Vadivel
 Murugan" <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>, "Vignesh
 Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>, "Xiangsheng Hou" <xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <devicetree.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:devicetree+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:devicetree+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 19:52:29 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> As discussed with Krzysztof and Chris, it seems like each NAND
> controller binding should actually restrain the properties allowed in
> the NAND chip node with its own "unevaluatedProperties: false". This
> only works if we reference a yaml schema which contains all the possible
> properties *in the NAND chip node*. Indeed, the NAND controller yaml
> 
> [ ... ]

Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Thanks!
Maxime