From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Wahren Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: bcm2835-rpi-zero-w: Drop unnecessary pinctrl Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:59:14 +0100 Message-ID: <2c95729b-bf41-fa39-44d8-db100d2670a0@i2se.com> References: <1548003960-4807-1-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> <87y37d3gbv.fsf@anholt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87y37d3gbv.fsf@anholt.net> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Eric Anholt , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Florian Fainelli , Ray Jui , Scott Branden Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am 21.01.19 um 21:29 schrieb Eric Anholt: > Stefan Wahren writes: > >> There is no need to specify a pinctrl for the reset GPIO. So we better >> remove this avoid a potential conflict between pinctrl and pwrseq >> after the pinmux driver has been changed to strict: >> >> pinctrl-bcm2835 20200000.gpio: pin gpio41 already requested by wifi-pwrseq; >> cannot claim for pinctrl-bcm2835:499 >> pinctrl-bcm2835 20200000.gpio: pin-41 (pinctrl-bcm2835:499) status -22 >> pwrseq_simple: probe of wifi-pwrseq failed with error -22 >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren > Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt Applied to bcm2835-dt-next Thanks