[PATCH v2 0/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[PATCH v2 0/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

Hello,

This patch series adds a driver and device tree binding documentation for
PMIC regulator control via Resource Power Manager-hardened (RPMh) on some
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SoCs such as SDM845.  RPMh is a hardware block
which contains several accelerators which are used to manage various
hardware resources that are shared between the processors of the SoC.  The
final hardware state of a regulator is determined within RPMh by performing
max aggregation of the requests made by all of the processors.

The RPMh regulator driver depends upon the RPMh driver [1] and command DB
driver [2] which are both still undergoing review.

Changes since v1 [3]:
 - Addressed review feedback from Doug, Mark, and Stephen
 - Replaced set_voltage()/get_voltage() callbacks with set_voltage_sel()/
   get_voltage_sel()
 - Added set_bypass()/get_bypass() callbacks for BOB pass-through mode
   control
 - Removed top-level PMIC data structures
 - Removed initialization variables from structs and passed them as
   function parameters
 - Removed various comments and error messages
 - Simplified mode handling
 - Refactored per-PMIC rpmh-regulator data specification
 - Simplified probe function
 - Moved header into DT patch
 - Removed redundant property listings from DT binding documentation

Thanks,
David

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/5/480
[2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/10/714
[3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1431

David Collins (2):
  regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings
  regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

 .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt     | 207 +++++
 drivers/regulator/Kconfig                          |   9 +
 drivers/regulator/Makefile                         |   1 +
 drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c            | 910 +++++++++++++++++++++
 .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h    |  36 +
 5 files changed, 1163 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[David Collins]

Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some
Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs.  These devices allow a given
processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which
are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests
from other processors in the SoC to determine the final PMIC
regulator hardware state.

Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
---
 .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt     | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++
 .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h    |  36 ++++
 2 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..69748ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. RPMh Regulators
+
+rpmh-regulator devices support PMIC regulator management via the Voltage
+Regulator Manager (VRM) and Oscillator Buffer (XOB) RPMh accelerators.  The APPS
+processor communicates with these hardware blocks via a Resource State
+Coordinator (RSC) using command packets.  The VRM allows changing four
+parameters for a given regulator: enable state, output voltage, operating mode,
+and minimum headroom voltage.  The XOB allows changing only a single parameter
+for a given regulator: its enable state.  Despite its name, the XOB is capable
+of controlling the enable state of any PMIC peripheral.  It is used for clock
+buffers, low-voltage switches, and LDO/SMPS regulators which have a fixed
+voltage and mode.
+
+=======================
+Required Node Structure
+=======================
+
+RPMh regulators must be described in two levels of device nodes.  The first
+level describes the PMIC containing the regulators and must reside within an
+RPMh device node.  The second level describes each regulator within the PMIC
+which is to be used on the board.  Each of these regulators maps to a single
+RPMh resource.
+
+The names used for regulator nodes must match those supported by a given PMIC.
+Supported regulator node names:
+	PM8998:		smps1 - smps13, ldo1 - ldo28, lvs1 - lvs2
+	PMI8998:	bob
+	PM8005:		smps1 - smps4
+
+========================
+First Level Nodes - PMIC
+========================
+
+- compatible
+	Usage:      required
+	Value type: <string>
+	Definition: Must be one of: "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators",
+		    "qcom,pmi8998-rpmh-regulators" or
+		    "qcom,pm8005-rpmh-regulators".
+
+- qcom,pmic-id
+	Usage:      required
+	Value type: <string>
+	Definition: RPMh resource name suffix used for the regulators found on
+		    this PMIC.  Typical values: "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f".
+
+- vdd_s1-supply
+- vdd_s2-supply
+- vdd_s3-supply
+- vdd_s4-supply
+- vdd_s5-supply
+- vdd_s6-supply
+- vdd_s7-supply
+- vdd_s8-supply
+- vdd_s9-supply
+- vdd_s10-supply
+- vdd_s11-supply
+- vdd_s12-supply
+- vdd_s13-supply
+- vdd_l1_l27-supply
+- vdd_l2_l8_l17-supply
+- vdd_l3_l11-supply
+- vdd_l4_l5-supply
+- vdd_l6-supply
+- vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15-supply
+- vdd_l9-supply
+- vdd_l10_l23_l25-supply
+- vdd_l13_l19_l21-supply
+- vdd_l16_l28-supply
+- vdd_l18_l22-supply
+- vdd_l20_l24-supply
+- vdd_l26-supply
+- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
+- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
+	Usage:      optional (PM8998 only)
+	Value type: <phandle>
+	Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
+		    regulators for this PMIC.
+
+- vdd_bob-supply
+	Usage:      optional (PMI8998 only)
+	Value type: <phandle>
+	Definition: BOB regulator parent supply phandle
+
+- vdd_s1-supply
+- vdd_s2-supply
+- vdd_s3-supply
+- vdd_s4-supply
+	Usage:      optional (PM8005 only)
+	Value type: <phandle>
+	Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
+		    regulators for this PMIC.
+
+===============================
+Second Level Nodes - Regulators
+===============================
+
+- qcom,regulator-initial-voltage
+	Usage:      optional; VRM regulators only
+	Value type: <u32>
+	Definition: Specifies the initial voltage in microvolts to request for a
+		    VRM regulator.
+
+- regulator-initial-mode
+	Usage:      optional; VRM regulators only
+	Value type: <u32>
+	Definition: Specifies the initial mode to request for a VRM regulator.
+		    Supported values are RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_* which are defined
+		    in [1] (i.e. 0 to 3).  This property may be specified even
+		    if the regulator-allow-set-load property is not specified.
+
+- qcom,allowed-drms-modes
+	Usage:      required if regulator-allow-set-load is specified;
+		    VRM regulators only
+	Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
+	Definition: A list of integers specifying the PMIC regulator modes which
+		    can be configured at runtime based upon consumer load needs.
+		    Supported values are RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_* which are defined
+		    in [1] (i.e. 0 to 3).
+
+- qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents
+	Usage:      required if regulator-allow-set-load is specified;
+		    VRM regulators only
+	Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
+	Definition: A list of integers specifying the maximum allowed load
+		    current in microamps for each of the modes listed in
+		    qcom,allowed-drms-modes (matched 1-to-1 in order).  Elements
+		    must be specified in order from lowest to highest value.
+
+- qcom,headroom-voltage
+	Usage:      optional; VRM regulators only
+	Value type: <u32>
+	Definition: Specifies the headroom voltage in microvolts to request for
+		    a VRM regulator.  RPMh hardware automatically ensures that
+		    the parent of this regulator outputs a voltage high enough
+		    to satisfy the requested headroom.  Supported values are
+		    0 to 511000.
+
+- qcom,always-wait-for-ack
+	Usage:      optional
+	Value type: <empty>
+	Definition: Boolean flag which indicates that the application processor
+		    must wait for an ACK or a NACK from RPMh for every request
+		    sent for this regulator including those which are for a
+		    strictly lower power state.
+
+Other properties defined in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator.txt
+may also be used.
+
+[1] include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h
+
+========
+Examples
+========
+
+#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
+
+&apps_rsc {
+	pm8998-rpmh-regulators {
+		compatible = "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators";
+		qcom,pmic-id = "a";
+
+		vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15-supply = <&pm8998_s5>;
+
+		smps2 {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
+			qcom,regulator-initial-voltage = <1100000>;
+		};
+
+		pm8998_s5: smps5 {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <1904000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <2040000>;
+			qcom,regulator-initial-voltage = <1904000>;
+		};
+
+		ldo7 {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+			qcom,regulator-initial-voltage = <1800000>;
+			qcom,headroom-voltage = <56000>;
+			regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM>;
+			regulator-allow-set-load;
+			qcom,allowed-drms-modes =
+				<RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM
+				 RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
+			qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents = <10000 1000000>;
+		};
+
+		lvs1 {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	pmi8998-rpmh-regulators {
+		compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-rpmh-regulators";
+		qcom,pmic-id = "b";
+
+		bob {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <3312000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <3600000>;
+			qcom,regulator-initial-voltage = <3312000>;
+			regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO>;
+		};
+	};
+};
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h b/include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4378c4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
+
+#ifndef __QCOM_RPMH_REGULATOR_H
+#define __QCOM_RPMH_REGULATOR_H
+
+/*
+ * These mode constants may be used for regulator-initial-mode and
+ * qcom,allowed-drms-modes properties of an RPMh regulator device tree node.
+ * Each type of regulator supports a subset of the possible modes.
+ *
+ * %RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET:	Retention mode in which only an extremely small
+ *				load current is allowed.  This mode is supported
+ *				by LDO and SMPS type regulators.
+ * %RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM:	Low power mode in which a small load current is
+ *				allowed.  This mode corresponds to PFM for SMPS
+ *				and BOB type regulators.  This mode is supported
+ *				by LDO, HFSMPS, BOB, and PMIC4 FTSMPS type
+ *				regulators.
+ * %RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO:	Auto mode in which the regulator hardware
+ *				automatically switches between LPM and HPM based
+ *				upon the real-time load current.  This mode is
+ *				supported by HFSMPS, BOB, and PMIC4 FTSMPS type
+ *				regulators.
+ * %RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM:	High power mode in which the full rated current
+ *				of the regulator is allowed.  This mode
+ *				corresponds to PWM for SMPS and BOB type
+ *				regulators.  This mode is supported by all types
+ *				of regulators.
+ */
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET		0
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM		1
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO	2
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM		3
+
+#endif
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:50:34PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some
> Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs.  These devices allow a given
> processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which
> are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests
> from other processors in the SoC to determine the final PMIC
> regulator hardware state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt     | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h    |  36 ++++
>  2 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..69748ea
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
> +Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. RPMh Regulators
> +
> +rpmh-regulator devices support PMIC regulator management via the Voltage
> +Regulator Manager (VRM) and Oscillator Buffer (XOB) RPMh accelerators.  The APPS
> +processor communicates with these hardware blocks via a Resource State
> +Coordinator (RSC) using command packets.  The VRM allows changing four
> +parameters for a given regulator: enable state, output voltage, operating mode,
> +and minimum headroom voltage.  The XOB allows changing only a single parameter
> +for a given regulator: its enable state.  Despite its name, the XOB is capable
> +of controlling the enable state of any PMIC peripheral.  It is used for clock
> +buffers, low-voltage switches, and LDO/SMPS regulators which have a fixed
> +voltage and mode.
> +
> +=======================
> +Required Node Structure
> +=======================
> +
> +RPMh regulators must be described in two levels of device nodes.  The first
> +level describes the PMIC containing the regulators and must reside within an
> +RPMh device node.  The second level describes each regulator within the PMIC
> +which is to be used on the board.  Each of these regulators maps to a single
> +RPMh resource.
> +
> +The names used for regulator nodes must match those supported by a given PMIC.
> +Supported regulator node names:
> +	PM8998:		smps1 - smps13, ldo1 - ldo28, lvs1 - lvs2
> +	PMI8998:	bob
> +	PM8005:		smps1 - smps4
> +
> +========================
> +First Level Nodes - PMIC
> +========================
> +
> +- compatible
> +	Usage:      required
> +	Value type: <string>
> +	Definition: Must be one of: "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators",
> +		    "qcom,pmi8998-rpmh-regulators" or
> +		    "qcom,pm8005-rpmh-regulators".
> +
> +- qcom,pmic-id
> +	Usage:      required
> +	Value type: <string>
> +	Definition: RPMh resource name suffix used for the regulators found on
> +		    this PMIC.  Typical values: "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f".
> +
> +- vdd_s1-supply

Use '-' rather than '_' on all these.

> +- vdd_s2-supply
> +- vdd_s3-supply
> +- vdd_s4-supply
> +- vdd_s5-supply
> +- vdd_s6-supply
> +- vdd_s7-supply
> +- vdd_s8-supply
> +- vdd_s9-supply
> +- vdd_s10-supply
> +- vdd_s11-supply
> +- vdd_s12-supply
> +- vdd_s13-supply
> +- vdd_l1_l27-supply
> +- vdd_l2_l8_l17-supply
> +- vdd_l3_l11-supply
> +- vdd_l4_l5-supply
> +- vdd_l6-supply
> +- vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15-supply
> +- vdd_l9-supply
> +- vdd_l10_l23_l25-supply
> +- vdd_l13_l19_l21-supply
> +- vdd_l16_l28-supply
> +- vdd_l18_l22-supply
> +- vdd_l20_l24-supply
> +- vdd_l26-supply
> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
> +	Usage:      optional (PM8998 only)
> +	Value type: <phandle>
> +	Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
> +		    regulators for this PMIC.
> +
> +- vdd_bob-supply
> +	Usage:      optional (PMI8998 only)
> +	Value type: <phandle>
> +	Definition: BOB regulator parent supply phandle
> +
> +- vdd_s1-supply
> +- vdd_s2-supply
> +- vdd_s3-supply
> +- vdd_s4-supply

Listed twice?

> +	Usage:      optional (PM8005 only)
> +	Value type: <phandle>
> +	Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
> +		    regulators for this PMIC.
> +
> +===============================
> +Second Level Nodes - Regulators
> +===============================
> +
> +- qcom,regulator-initial-voltage
> +	Usage:      optional; VRM regulators only
> +	Value type: <u32>
> +	Definition: Specifies the initial voltage in microvolts to request for a
> +		    VRM regulator.
> +
> +- regulator-initial-mode

Vendor prefix?

> +	Usage:      optional; VRM regulators only
> +	Value type: <u32>
> +	Definition: Specifies the initial mode to request for a VRM regulator.
> +		    Supported values are RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_* which are defined
> +		    in [1] (i.e. 0 to 3).  This property may be specified even
> +		    if the regulator-allow-set-load property is not specified.
> +
> +- qcom,allowed-drms-modes
> +	Usage:      required if regulator-allow-set-load is specified;
> +		    VRM regulators only
> +	Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> +	Definition: A list of integers specifying the PMIC regulator modes which
> +		    can be configured at runtime based upon consumer load needs.
> +		    Supported values are RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_* which are defined
> +		    in [1] (i.e. 0 to 3).
> +
> +- qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents
> +	Usage:      required if regulator-allow-set-load is specified;
> +		    VRM regulators only
> +	Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> +	Definition: A list of integers specifying the maximum allowed load
> +		    current in microamps for each of the modes listed in
> +		    qcom,allowed-drms-modes (matched 1-to-1 in order).  Elements
> +		    must be specified in order from lowest to highest value.
> +
> +- qcom,headroom-voltage
> +	Usage:      optional; VRM regulators only
> +	Value type: <u32>
> +	Definition: Specifies the headroom voltage in microvolts to request for
> +		    a VRM regulator.  RPMh hardware automatically ensures that
> +		    the parent of this regulator outputs a voltage high enough
> +		    to satisfy the requested headroom.  Supported values are
> +		    0 to 511000.
> +
> +- qcom,always-wait-for-ack
> +	Usage:      optional
> +	Value type: <empty>
> +	Definition: Boolean flag which indicates that the application processor
> +		    must wait for an ACK or a NACK from RPMh for every request
> +		    sent for this regulator including those which are for a
> +		    strictly lower power state.
> +
> +Other properties defined in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator.txt
> +may also be used.
> +
> +[1] include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h
> +
> +========
> +Examples
> +========
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
> +
> +&apps_rsc {
> +	pm8998-rpmh-regulators {
> +		compatible = "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators";
> +		qcom,pmic-id = "a";
> +
> +		vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15-supply = <&pm8998_s5>;
> +
> +		smps2 {
> +			regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
> +			regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> +			qcom,regulator-initial-voltage = <1100000>;
> +		};
> +
> +		pm8998_s5: smps5 {
> +			regulator-min-microvolt = <1904000>;
> +			regulator-max-microvolt = <2040000>;
> +			qcom,regulator-initial-voltage = <1904000>;
> +		};
> +
> +		ldo7 {
> +			regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> +			regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> +			qcom,regulator-initial-voltage = <1800000>;
> +			qcom,headroom-voltage = <56000>;
> +			regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM>;
> +			regulator-allow-set-load;
> +			qcom,allowed-drms-modes =
> +				<RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM
> +				 RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
> +			qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents = <10000 1000000>;
> +		};
> +
> +		lvs1 {
> +			regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> +			regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	pmi8998-rpmh-regulators {
> +		compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-rpmh-regulators";
> +		qcom,pmic-id = "b";
> +
> +		bob {
> +			regulator-min-microvolt = <3312000>;
> +			regulator-max-microvolt = <3600000>;
> +			qcom,regulator-initial-voltage = <3312000>;
> +			regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +};
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h b/include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4378c4b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
> +
> +#ifndef __QCOM_RPMH_REGULATOR_H
> +#define __QCOM_RPMH_REGULATOR_H
> +
> +/*
> + * These mode constants may be used for regulator-initial-mode and
> + * qcom,allowed-drms-modes properties of an RPMh regulator device tree node.
> + * Each type of regulator supports a subset of the possible modes.
> + *
> + * %RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET:	Retention mode in which only an extremely small
> + *				load current is allowed.  This mode is supported
> + *				by LDO and SMPS type regulators.
> + * %RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM:	Low power mode in which a small load current is
> + *				allowed.  This mode corresponds to PFM for SMPS
> + *				and BOB type regulators.  This mode is supported
> + *				by LDO, HFSMPS, BOB, and PMIC4 FTSMPS type
> + *				regulators.
> + * %RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO:	Auto mode in which the regulator hardware
> + *				automatically switches between LPM and HPM based
> + *				upon the real-time load current.  This mode is
> + *				supported by HFSMPS, BOB, and PMIC4 FTSMPS type
> + *				regulators.
> + * %RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM:	High power mode in which the full rated current
> + *				of the regulator is allowed.  This mode
> + *				corresponds to PWM for SMPS and BOB type
> + *				regulators.  This mode is supported by all types
> + *				of regulators.
> + */
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET		0
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM		1
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO	2
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM		3
> +
> +#endif
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[David Collins]

Hello Rob,

On 04/16/2018 01:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:50:34PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some
>> Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs.  These devices allow a given
>> processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which
>> are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests
>> from other processors in the SoC to determine the final PMIC
>> regulator hardware state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt     | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h    |  36 ++++
>> [...]
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt
>> [...]
>> +- vdd_s1-supply
> 
> Use '-' rather than '_' on all these.

I will change this on the next patch set.


>> +- vdd_s2-supply
>> +- vdd_s3-supply
>> +- vdd_s4-supply
>> +- vdd_s5-supply
>> +- vdd_s6-supply
>> +- vdd_s7-supply
>> +- vdd_s8-supply
>> +- vdd_s9-supply
>> +- vdd_s10-supply
>> +- vdd_s11-supply
>> +- vdd_s12-supply
>> +- vdd_s13-supply
>> +- vdd_l1_l27-supply
>> +- vdd_l2_l8_l17-supply
>> +- vdd_l3_l11-supply
>> +- vdd_l4_l5-supply
>> +- vdd_l6-supply
>> +- vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15-supply
>> +- vdd_l9-supply
>> +- vdd_l10_l23_l25-supply
>> +- vdd_l13_l19_l21-supply
>> +- vdd_l16_l28-supply
>> +- vdd_l18_l22-supply
>> +- vdd_l20_l24-supply
>> +- vdd_l26-supply
>> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
>> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
>> +	Usage:      optional (PM8998 only)
>> +	Value type: <phandle>
>> +	Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
>> +		    regulators for this PMIC.
>> +
>> +- vdd_bob-supply
>> +	Usage:      optional (PMI8998 only)
>> +	Value type: <phandle>
>> +	Definition: BOB regulator parent supply phandle
>> +
>> +- vdd_s1-supply
>> +- vdd_s2-supply
>> +- vdd_s3-supply
>> +- vdd_s4-supply
> 
> Listed twice?
> 
>> +	Usage:      optional (PM8005 only)
>> +	Value type: <phandle>
>> +	Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
>> +		    regulators for this PMIC.

I listed vdd_s1-supply to vdd_s4-supply here twice because I wanted to
group together the supplies supported by each PMIC.  PM8005 only supports
these 4 regulator supplies.  PM8998 supports these 4 along with many
others.  How else would suggest that I capture this per-PMIC support
information?


>> +===============================
>> +Second Level Nodes - Regulators
>> +===============================
>> +
>> +- qcom,regulator-initial-voltage
>> +	Usage:      optional; VRM regulators only
>> +	Value type: <u32>
>> +	Definition: Specifies the initial voltage in microvolts to request for a
>> +		    VRM regulator.
>> +
>> +- regulator-initial-mode
> 
> Vendor prefix?

No, this does not need a vendor prefix.  The regulator-initial-mode
property is already defined for all regulator devices [1]:

    regulator-initial-mode: initial operating mode. The set of possible
    operating modes depends on the capabilities of every hardware so each
    device binding documentation explains which values the regulator
    supports.

The values supported by the property are hardware specific and thus must
be listed in device specific binding files like this one.  Here is a
previously merged example: [2].

Thanks,
David

[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt?h=v4.17-rc1#n59
[2]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/twl-regulator.txt?h=v4.17-rc1#n60

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some
> Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs.  These devices allow a given
> processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which
> are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests
> from other processors in the SoC to determine the final PMIC
> regulator hardware state.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt     | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h    |  36 ++++
>  2 files changed, 243 insertions(+)

I noticed that "qcom,rpmh-resource-type" is now gone.  Not needed
anymore?  Oh, I see.  Stephen said to add it when it's needed.  OK,
fine.


> +===============================
> +Second Level Nodes - Regulators
> +===============================
> +
> +- qcom,regulator-initial-voltage

nit: regulator framework tends to include "microvolt" in the name to
make it really obvious in the device tree what the units are.  Can you
do that too?


> +- qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents

Could use microamp in the name of the property too...


> +                       qcom,allowed-drms-modes =
> +                               <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM
> +                                RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
> +                       qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents = <10000 1000000>;

optional nit: to make it match downstream drivers, does it make sense
to change this to:

  <9999 999999>

...so if a driver used to request exactly 10000 mA that it will end up
with the same mode (no idea if drivers actually do that).


-Doug

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[David Collins]

On 04/17/2018 01:06 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> [...]
>> +- qcom,regulator-initial-voltage
> 
> nit: regulator framework tends to include "microvolt" in the name to
> make it really obvious in the device tree what the units are.  Can you
> do that too?

Sure, I'll change the name to be: qcom,regulator-initial-microvolt.


>> +- qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents
> 
> Could use microamp in the name of the property too...

Ok, I'll change the name to be: qcom,drms-mode-max-microamps.


>> +                       qcom,allowed-drms-modes =
>> +                               <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM
>> +                                RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
>> +                       qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents = <10000 1000000>;
> 
> optional nit: to make it match downstream drivers, does it make sense
> to change this to:
> 
>   <9999 999999>
> 
> ...so if a driver used to request exactly 10000 mA that it will end up
> with the same mode (no idea if drivers actually do that).

I'd prefer to leave the example with <10000 1000000> as it looks cleaner
to me and the example numbers are arbitrary.  It would also be good to use
<10000 1000000> in actual board DT files.  We can address consumers
expecting legacy behavior for 10000 uA requests as needed.

Take care,
David


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> +- vdd_l26-supply
> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
> +       Usage:      optional (PM8998 only)
> +       Value type: <phandle>
> +       Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
> +                   regulators for this PMIC.

One small additional nit here is that "vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply" is listed twice.

Also on the schematics (and in the PM8998 datasheet) I have this is
"VIN_LVS_1_2".  It seems like you should be consistent here and call
this "vin-lvs-1-2-supply".

-Doug

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[David Collins]

On 05/02/2018 09:37 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> +- vdd_l26-supply
>> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
>> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
>> +       Usage:      optional (PM8998 only)
>> +       Value type: <phandle>
>> +       Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
>> +                   regulators for this PMIC.
> 
> One small additional nit here is that "vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply" is listed twice.

I'll remove the duplicate.


> Also on the schematics (and in the PM8998 datasheet) I have this is
> "VIN_LVS_1_2".  It seems like you should be consistent here and call
> this "vin-lvs-1-2-supply".

I was trying to keep the naming consistent within device tree binding
documentation for LVS vs LDO and SMPS (e.g. 'vdd' vs 'vin' prefix).  I
suppose that I can change this to match the hardware documentation pin
name.  I can also change '_' to '-' in the supply names if that is preferred.

Take care,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:13 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 05/02/2018 09:37 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> +- vdd_l26-supply
>>> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
>>> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply
>>> +       Usage:      optional (PM8998 only)
>>> +       Value type: <phandle>
>>> +       Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the
>>> +                   regulators for this PMIC.
>>
>> One small additional nit here is that "vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply" is listed twice.
>
> I'll remove the duplicate.
>
>
>> Also on the schematics (and in the PM8998 datasheet) I have this is
>> "VIN_LVS_1_2".  It seems like you should be consistent here and call
>> this "vin-lvs-1-2-supply".
>
> I was trying to keep the naming consistent within device tree binding
> documentation for LVS vs LDO and SMPS (e.g. 'vdd' vs 'vin' prefix).  I
> suppose that I can change this to match the hardware documentation pin
> name.  I can also change '_' to '-' in the supply names if that is preferred.

I'd rather it match the docs.  I personally have no idea for why the
writer of the docs used "vdd" vs. "vin", but even if they had no good
reason matching the docs makes this searchable.

As far as the "_" to "-", Rob asked for that earlier in this thread
and you says "I will change this on the next patch set."  In general
the desire to convert "_" to "-" makes this less searchable (since the
docs use "_"), but that's the way device tree guys want it so so c'est
la vie.  Luckily it's easily to mentally change the "-"s back to "_"s
when searching...

-Doug

[PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

Add the QCOM RPMh regulator driver to manage PMIC regulators
which are controlled via RPMh on some Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
SoCs.  RPMh is a hardware block which contains several
accelerators which are used to manage various hardware resources
that are shared between the processors of the SoC.  The final
hardware state of a regulator is determined within RPMh by
performing max aggregation of the requests made by all of the
processors.

Add support for PMIC regulator control via the voltage regulator
manager (VRM) and oscillator buffer (XOB) RPMh accelerators.  VRM
supports manipulation of enable state, voltage, mode, and
headroom voltage.  XOB supports manipulation of enable state.

Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/Kconfig               |   9 +
 drivers/regulator/Makefile              |   1 +
 drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c | 910 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 920 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
index 097f617..e0ecd0a 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
@@ -671,6 +671,15 @@ config REGULATOR_QCOM_RPM
 	  Qualcomm RPM as a module. The module will be named
 	  "qcom_rpm-regulator".
 
+config REGULATOR_QCOM_RPMH
+	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. RPMh regulator driver"
+	depends on (QCOM_RPMH && QCOM_COMMAND_DB && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  This driver supports control of PMIC regulators via the RPMh hardware
+	  block found on Qualcomm Technologies Inc. SoCs.  RPMh regulator
+	  control allows for voting on regulator state between multiple
+	  processors within the SoC.
+
 config REGULATOR_QCOM_SMD_RPM
 	tristate "Qualcomm SMD based RPM regulator driver"
 	depends on QCOM_SMD_RPM
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Makefile b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
index 590674f..c2274dd 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6323)	+= mt6323-regulator.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6380)	+= mt6380-regulator.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6397)	+= mt6397-regulator.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_RPM) += qcom_rpm-regulator.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_RPMH) += qcom_rpmh-regulator.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_SMD_RPM) += qcom_smd-regulator.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_SPMI) += qcom_spmi-regulator.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS) += palmas-regulator.o
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..03b1301
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c
@@ -0,0 +1,910 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
+
+#include <soc/qcom/cmd-db.h>
+#include <soc/qcom/rpmh.h>
+
+#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
+
+/**
+ * enum rpmh_regulator_type - supported RPMh accelerator types
+ * %VRM:	RPMh VRM accelerator which supports voting on enable, voltage,
+ *		mode, and headroom voltage of LDO, SMPS, and BOB type PMIC
+ *		regulators.
+ * %XOB:	RPMh XOB accelerator which supports voting on the enable state
+ *		of PMIC regulators.
+ */
+enum rpmh_regulator_type {
+	VRM,
+	XOB,
+};
+
+#define RPMH_VRM_HEADROOM_MAX_UV		511000
+
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE		0x0
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_ENABLE		0x4
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_MODE		0x8
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_HEADROOM		0xC
+
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_DISABLE			0x0
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_ENABLE			0x1
+
+#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT		4
+
+/**
+ * struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data - RPMh regulator hardware configurations
+ * @regulator_type:		RPMh accelerator type used to manage this
+ *				regulator
+ * @ops:			Pointer to regulator ops callback structure
+ * @voltage_range:		The single range of voltages supported by this
+ *				PMIC regulator type
+ * @n_voltages:			The number of unique voltage set points defined
+ *				by voltage_range
+ * @pmic_mode_map:		Array indexed by regulator framework mode
+ *				containing PMIC hardware modes.  Must be large
+ *				enough to index all framework modes supported
+ *				by this regulator hardware type.
+ * @of_map_mode:		Maps an RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_* mode value defined
+ *				in device tree to a regulator framework mode
+ * @bypass_mode:		VRM PMIC mode value corresponding to bypass
+ *				(pass-through) for this regulator.  Only used
+ *				by BOB type via VRM.
+ */
+struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data {
+	enum rpmh_regulator_type		regulator_type;
+	const struct regulator_ops		*ops;
+	const struct regulator_linear_range	voltage_range;
+	int					n_voltages;
+	const u32				*pmic_mode_map;
+	unsigned int			      (*of_map_mode)(unsigned int mode);
+	u32					bypass_mode;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct rpmh_vreg - individual rpmh regulator data structure encapsulating a
+ *		single regulator device
+ * @rpmh_client:		Handle used for rpmh communications
+ * @addr:			Base address of the regulator resource within
+ *				an RPMh accelerator
+ * @rdesc:			Regulator descriptor
+ * @hw_data:			PMIC regulator configuration data for this RPMh
+ *				regulator
+ * @regulator_type:		RPMh accelerator type for this regulator
+ *				resource
+ * @always_wait_for_ack:	Boolean flag indicating if a request must always
+ *				wait for an ACK from RPMh before continuing even
+ *				if it corresponds to a strictly lower power
+ *				state (e.g. enabled --> disabled).
+ * @drms_mode:			Array of regulator framework modes which can
+ *				be configured dynamically for this regulator
+ *				via the set_load() callback.
+ * @drms_mode_max_uA:		Array of maximum load currents in microamps
+ *				supported by the corresponding modes in
+ *				drms_mode.  Elements must be specified in
+ *				strictly increasing order.
+ * @drms_mode_count:		The number of elements in drms_mode array.
+ * @enabled:			Boolean indicating if the regulator is enabled
+ *				or not
+ * @voltage_selector:		Selector used for get_voltage_sel() and
+ *				set_voltage_sel() callbacks
+ * @mode:			RPMh VRM regulator current framework mode
+ * @bypassed:			Boolean indicating if the regulator is in
+ *				bypass (pass-through) mode or not.  This is
+ *				only used by BOB rpmh-regulator resources.
+ */
+struct rpmh_vreg {
+	struct rpmh_client		*rpmh_client;
+	u32				addr;
+	struct regulator_desc		rdesc;
+	const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data	*hw_data;
+	enum rpmh_regulator_type	regulator_type;
+	bool				always_wait_for_ack;
+	unsigned int			*drms_mode;
+	int				*drms_mode_max_uA;
+	size_t				drms_mode_count;
+
+	bool				enabled;
+	int				voltage_selector;
+	unsigned int			mode;
+	bool				bypassed;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct rpmh_vreg_init_data - initialization data for an RPMh regulator
+ * @name:			Name for the regulator which also corresponds
+ *				to the device tree subnode name of the regulator
+ * @resource_name:		RPMh regulator resource name format string.
+ *				This must include exactly one field: '%s' which
+ *				is filled at run-time with the PMIC ID provided
+ *				by device tree property qcom,pmic-id.  Example:
+ *				"ldo%s1" for RPMh resource "ldoa1".
+ * @supply_name:		Parent supply regulator name
+ * @hw_data:			Configuration data for this PMIC regulator type
+ */
+struct rpmh_vreg_init_data {
+	const char			*name;
+	const char			*resource_name;
+	const char			*supply_name;
+	const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data	*hw_data;
+};
+
+/**
+ * rpmh_regulator_send_request() - send the request to RPMh
+ * @vreg:		Pointer to the RPMh regulator
+ * @cmd:		RPMh commands to send
+ * @count:		Size of cmd array
+ * @wait_for_ack:	Boolean indicating if execution must wait until the
+ *			request has been acknowledged as complete
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
+ */
+static int rpmh_regulator_send_request(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
+			struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int count, bool wait_for_ack)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (wait_for_ack || vreg->always_wait_for_ack)
+		ret = rpmh_write(vreg->rpmh_client,
+				RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE, cmd, count);
+	else
+		ret = rpmh_write_async(vreg->rpmh_client,
+				RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE, cmd, count);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+
+	return vreg->enabled;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+	struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
+		.addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_ENABLE,
+		.data = RPMH_REGULATOR_ENABLE,
+	};
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1, true);
+
+	if (!ret)
+		vreg->enabled = true;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+	struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
+		.addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_ENABLE,
+		.data = RPMH_REGULATOR_DISABLE,
+	};
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1, false);
+
+	if (!ret)
+		vreg->enabled = false;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+				unsigned int selector)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+	struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
+		.addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE,
+	};
+	int ret;
+
+	/* VRM voltage control register is set with voltage in millivolts. */
+	cmd.data = DIV_ROUND_UP(regulator_list_voltage_linear_range(rdev,
+							selector), 1000);
+
+	ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1,
+					  selector > vreg->voltage_selector);
+	if (!ret)
+		vreg->voltage_selector = selector;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+
+	return vreg->voltage_selector;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
+					unsigned int mode, bool bypassed)
+{
+	struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
+		.addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_MODE,
+	};
+
+	cmd.data = bypassed ? vreg->hw_data->bypass_mode
+			    : vreg->hw_data->pmic_mode_map[mode];
+
+	return rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1, true);
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+					unsigned int mode)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (mode == vreg->mode)
+		return 0;
+	else if (mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(vreg, mode, vreg->bypassed);
+	if (!ret)
+		vreg->mode = mode;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+
+	return vreg->mode;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int load_uA)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < vreg->drms_mode_count - 1; i++)
+		if (load_uA < vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i])
+			break;
+
+	return rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode(rdev, vreg->drms_mode[i]);
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+				bool enable)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (vreg->bypassed == enable)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(vreg, vreg->mode, enable);
+	if (!ret)
+		vreg->bypassed = enable;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+				bool *enable)
+{
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+
+	*enable = vreg->bypassed;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct regulator_ops rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops = {
+	.enable			= rpmh_regulator_enable,
+	.disable		= rpmh_regulator_disable,
+	.is_enabled		= rpmh_regulator_is_enabled,
+	.set_voltage_sel	= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_voltage_sel,
+	.get_voltage_sel	= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_voltage_sel,
+	.list_voltage		= regulator_list_voltage_linear_range,
+	.set_mode		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode,
+	.get_mode		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_mode,
+	.set_load		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load,
+};
+
+static const struct regulator_ops rpmh_regulator_vrm_bypass_ops = {
+	.enable			= rpmh_regulator_enable,
+	.disable		= rpmh_regulator_disable,
+	.is_enabled		= rpmh_regulator_is_enabled,
+	.set_voltage_sel	= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_voltage_sel,
+	.get_voltage_sel	= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_voltage_sel,
+	.list_voltage		= regulator_list_voltage_linear_range,
+	.set_mode		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode,
+	.get_mode		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_mode,
+	.set_load		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load,
+	.set_bypass		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_bypass,
+	.get_bypass		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_bypass,
+};
+
+static const struct regulator_ops rpmh_regulator_xob_ops = {
+	.enable			= rpmh_regulator_enable,
+	.disable		= rpmh_regulator_disable,
+	.is_enabled		= rpmh_regulator_is_enabled,
+};
+
+/**
+ * rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes() - parse the supported mode configurations
+ *		for a VRM RPMh resource from device tree
+ * vreg:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
+ * dev:			Pointer to the top level rpmh-regulator PMIC device
+ * node:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
+ *			device node
+ *
+ * This function initializes the drms_mode[] and drms_mode_max_uA[] arrays of
+ * vreg based upon the values of optional device tree properties.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
+ */
+static int rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
+				struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
+{
+	const char *prop;
+	int i, len, ret, mode;
+	u32 *buf;
+
+	/* qcom,allowed-drms-modes is optional */
+	prop = "qcom,allowed-drms-modes";
+	len = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, prop, sizeof(u32));
+	if (len < 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	vreg->drms_mode = devm_kcalloc(dev, len, sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode),
+					GFP_KERNEL);
+	vreg->drms_mode_max_uA = devm_kcalloc(dev, len,
+				   sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode_max_uA), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!vreg->drms_mode || !vreg->drms_mode_max_uA)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	vreg->drms_mode_count = len;
+
+	buf = kcalloc(len, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!buf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, prop, buf, len);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: unable to read %s, ret=%d\n",
+			node->name, prop, ret);
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+		mode = vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode(buf[i]);
+		if (mode <= 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "%s: element %d of %s = %u is invalid for this regulator\n",
+				node->name, i, prop, buf[i]);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto done;
+		}
+
+		vreg->drms_mode[i] = mode;
+	}
+
+	prop = "qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents";
+	len = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, prop, sizeof(u32));
+	if (len != vreg->drms_mode_count) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: invalid element count=%d for %s\n",
+			node->name, len, prop);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, prop, buf, len);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: unable to read %s, ret=%d\n",
+			node->name, prop, ret);
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+		vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i] = buf[i];
+
+		if (i > 0 && vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i]
+				<= vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i - 1]) {
+			dev_err(dev, "%s: %s elements are not in ascending order\n",
+				node->name, prop);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto done;
+		}
+	}
+
+done:
+	kfree(buf);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters() - initialize the RPMh resource
+ *		request for this regulator based on optional device tree
+ *		properties
+ * vreg:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
+ * dev:			Pointer to the top level rpmh-regulator PMIC device
+ * node:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
+ *			device node
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
+ */
+static int rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
+				struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
+{
+	struct tcs_cmd cmd[2] = {};
+	const struct regulator_linear_range *range;
+	const char *prop;
+	int cmd_count = 0;
+	int ret, selector;
+	u32 uV;
+
+	if (vreg->hw_data->regulator_type == VRM) {
+		prop = "qcom,headroom-voltage";
+		ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
+		if (!ret) {
+			if (uV > RPMH_VRM_HEADROOM_MAX_UV) {
+				dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
+					node->name, prop, uV);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+
+			cmd[cmd_count].addr
+				= vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_HEADROOM;
+			cmd[cmd_count++].data = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV, 1000);
+		}
+
+		prop = "qcom,regulator-initial-voltage";
+		ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
+		if (!ret) {
+			range = &vreg->hw_data->voltage_range;
+			selector = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - range->min_uV,
+					range->uV_step) + range->min_sel;
+			if (uV < range->min_uV || selector > range->max_sel) {
+				dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
+					node->name, prop, uV);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+
+			vreg->voltage_selector = selector;
+
+			cmd[cmd_count].addr
+				= vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE;
+			cmd[cmd_count++].data
+				= DIV_ROUND_UP(selector * range->uV_step
+						+ range->min_uV, 1000);
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (cmd_count) {
+		ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, cmd, cmd_count, true);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "%s: could not send default config, ret=%d\n",
+				node->name, ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rpmh_regulator_init_vreg() - initialize all attributes of an rpmh-regulator
+ * vreg:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
+ * dev:			Pointer to the top level rpmh-regulator PMIC device
+ * node:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
+ *			device node
+ * pmic_id:		String used to identify the top level rpmh-regulator
+ *			PMIC device on the board
+ * rpmh_data:		Pointer to a null-terminated array of rpmh-regulator
+ *			resources defined for the top level PMIC device
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
+ */
+static int rpmh_regulator_init_vreg(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg, struct device *dev,
+				struct device_node *node, const char *pmic_id,
+				const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *rpmh_data)
+{
+	struct regulator_config reg_config = {};
+	char rpmh_resource_name[20] = "";
+	struct regulator_dev *rdev;
+	enum rpmh_regulator_type type;
+	struct regulator_init_data *init_data;
+	unsigned int mode;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	for (; rpmh_data->name; rpmh_data++)
+		if (!strcmp(rpmh_data->name, node->name))
+			break;
+
+	if (!rpmh_data->name) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Unknown regulator %s\n", node->name);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	scnprintf(rpmh_resource_name, sizeof(rpmh_resource_name),
+		rpmh_data->resource_name, pmic_id);
+
+	vreg->addr = cmd_db_read_addr(rpmh_resource_name);
+	if (!vreg->addr) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: could not find RPMh address for resource %s\n",
+			node->name, rpmh_resource_name);
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	vreg->rdesc.name = rpmh_data->name;
+	vreg->rdesc.supply_name = rpmh_data->supply_name;
+	vreg->regulator_type = rpmh_data->hw_data->regulator_type;
+	vreg->hw_data = rpmh_data->hw_data;
+
+	if (rpmh_data->hw_data->n_voltages) {
+		vreg->rdesc.linear_ranges = &rpmh_data->hw_data->voltage_range;
+		vreg->rdesc.n_linear_ranges = 1;
+		vreg->rdesc.n_voltages = rpmh_data->hw_data->n_voltages;
+	}
+
+	type = vreg->regulator_type;
+
+	if (type == VRM) {
+		ret = rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes(vreg, dev, node);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	vreg->always_wait_for_ack = of_property_read_bool(node,
+						"qcom,always-wait-for-ack");
+
+	vreg->rdesc.owner	= THIS_MODULE;
+	vreg->rdesc.type	= REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
+	vreg->rdesc.ops		= vreg->hw_data->ops;
+	vreg->rdesc.of_map_mode	= vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode;
+
+	init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(dev, node, &vreg->rdesc);
+	if (!init_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	if (type == XOB && init_data->constraints.min_uV) {
+		vreg->rdesc.fixed_uV = init_data->constraints.min_uV;
+		vreg->rdesc.n_voltages = 1;
+	}
+
+	if (vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode) {
+		init_data->constraints.valid_ops_mask |= REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE;
+		for (i = 0; i < RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT; i++) {
+			mode = vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode(i);
+			if (mode > 0)
+				init_data->constraints.valid_modes_mask |= mode;
+		}
+	}
+
+	reg_config.dev		= dev;
+	reg_config.init_data	= init_data;
+	reg_config.of_node	= node;
+	reg_config.driver_data	= vreg;
+
+	ret = rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters(vreg, dev, node);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, &vreg->rdesc, &reg_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(rdev);
+		rdev = NULL;
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: devm_regulator_register() failed, ret=%d\n",
+			node->name, ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "%s regulator registered for RPMh resource %s @ 0x%05X\n",
+		node->name, rpmh_resource_name, vreg->addr);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = 4,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 5,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = -EINVAL,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 7,
+};
+
+static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_ldo_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
+{
+	static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = -EINVAL,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
+	};
+
+	if (mode >= RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return of_mode_map[mode];
+}
+
+static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = 4,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 5,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = 6,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 7,
+};
+
+static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_smps_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
+{
+	static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
+	};
+
+	if (mode >= RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return of_mode_map[mode];
+}
+
+static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_bob[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = -EINVAL,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 1,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = 2,
+	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 3,
+};
+
+static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
+{
+	static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = -EINVAL,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
+		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
+	};
+
+	if (mode >= RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return of_mode_map[mode];
+}
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_pldo = {
+	.regulator_type = VRM,
+	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
+	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1664000, 0, 255, 8000),
+	.n_voltages = 256,
+	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo,
+	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_ldo_of_map_mode,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_pldo_lv = {
+	.regulator_type = VRM,
+	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
+	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1256000, 0, 127, 8000),
+	.n_voltages = 128,
+	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo,
+	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_ldo_of_map_mode,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_nldo = {
+	.regulator_type = VRM,
+	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
+	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(312000, 0, 127, 8000),
+	.n_voltages = 128,
+	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo,
+	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_ldo_of_map_mode,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_hfsmps3 = {
+	.regulator_type = VRM,
+	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
+	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(320000, 0, 215, 8000),
+	.n_voltages = 216,
+	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps,
+	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_smps_of_map_mode,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_ftsmps426 = {
+	.regulator_type = VRM,
+	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
+	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(320000, 0, 258, 4000),
+	.n_voltages = 259,
+	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps,
+	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_smps_of_map_mode,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_bob = {
+	.regulator_type = VRM,
+	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_bypass_ops,
+	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1824000, 0, 83, 32000),
+	.n_voltages = 84,
+	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_bob,
+	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode,
+	.bypass_mode = 0,
+};
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_lvs = {
+	.regulator_type = XOB,
+	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_xob_ops,
+	/* LVS hardware does not support voltage or mode configuration. */
+};
+
+#define RPMH_VREG(_name, _resource_name, _hw_data, _supply_name) \
+{ \
+	.name		= _name, \
+	.resource_name	= _resource_name, \
+	.hw_data	= _hw_data, \
+	.supply_name	= _supply_name, \
+}
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8998_vreg_data[] = {
+	RPMH_VREG("smps1",  "smp%s1",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s1"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps2",  "smp%s2",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s2"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps3",  "smp%s3",  &pmic4_hfsmps3,   "vdd_s3"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps4",  "smp%s4",  &pmic4_hfsmps3,   "vdd_s4"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps5",  "smp%s5",  &pmic4_hfsmps3,   "vdd_s5"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps6",  "smp%s6",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s6"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps7",  "smp%s7",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s7"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps8",  "smp%s8",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s8"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps9",  "smp%s9",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s9"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps10", "smp%s10", &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s10"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps11", "smp%s11", &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s11"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps12", "smp%s12", &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s12"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps13", "smp%s13", &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s13"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo1",   "ldo%s1",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l1_l27"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo2",   "ldo%s2",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l2_l8_l17"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo3",   "ldo%s3",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l3_l11"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo4",   "ldo%s4",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l4_l5"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo5",   "ldo%s5",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l4_l5"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo6",   "ldo%s6",  &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l6"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo7",   "ldo%s7",  &pmic4_pldo_lv,   "vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo8",   "ldo%s8",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l2_l8_l17"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo9",   "ldo%s9",  &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l9"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo10",  "ldo%s10", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l10_l23_l25"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo11",  "ldo%s11", &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l3_l11"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo12",  "ldo%s12", &pmic4_pldo_lv,   "vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo13",  "ldo%s13", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l13_l19_l21"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo14",  "ldo%s14", &pmic4_pldo_lv,   "vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo15",  "ldo%s15", &pmic4_pldo_lv,   "vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo16",  "ldo%s16", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l16_l28"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo17",  "ldo%s17", &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l2_l8_l17"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo18",  "ldo%s18", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l18_l22"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo19",  "ldo%s19", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l13_l19_l21"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo20",  "ldo%s20", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l20_l24"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo21",  "ldo%s21", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l13_l19_l21"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo22",  "ldo%s22", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l18_l22"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo23",  "ldo%s23", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l10_l23_l25"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo24",  "ldo%s24", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l20_l24"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo25",  "ldo%s25", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l10_l23_l25"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo26",  "ldo%s26", &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l26"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo27",  "ldo%s27", &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l1_l27"),
+	RPMH_VREG("ldo28",  "ldo%s28", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l16_l28"),
+	RPMH_VREG("lvs1",   "vs%s1",   &pmic4_lvs,       "vdd_lvs1_lvs2"),
+	RPMH_VREG("lvs2",   "vs%s2",   &pmic4_lvs,       "vdd_lvs1_lvs2"),
+	{},
+};
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pmi8998_vreg_data[] = {
+	RPMH_VREG("bob",    "bob%s1",  &pmic4_bob,       "vdd_bob"),
+	{},
+};
+
+static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8005_vreg_data[] = {
+	RPMH_VREG("smps1",  "smp%s1",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s1"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps2",  "smp%s2",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s2"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps3",  "smp%s3",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s3"),
+	RPMH_VREG("smps4",  "smp%s4",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s4"),
+	{},
+};
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *vreg_data;
+	struct rpmh_client *rpmh_client;
+	struct device_node *node;
+	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg;
+	const char *pmic_id;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = cmd_db_ready();
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(dev, "Command DB not available, ret=%d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	vreg_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!vreg_data)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "qcom,pmic-id", &pmic_id);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "qcom,pmic-id missing in DT node\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	rpmh_client = rpmh_get_client(pdev);
+	if (IS_ERR(rpmh_client))
+		return PTR_ERR(rpmh_client);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpmh_client);
+
+	for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, node) {
+		vreg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*vreg), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!vreg) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			of_node_put(node);
+			goto cleanup;
+		}
+
+		vreg->rpmh_client = rpmh_client;
+
+		ret = rpmh_regulator_init_vreg(vreg, dev, node, pmic_id,
+						vreg_data);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			of_node_put(node);
+			goto cleanup;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+cleanup:
+	rpmh_release(rpmh_client);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rpmh_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct rpmh_client *rpmh_client = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	rpmh_release(rpmh_client);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id rpmh_regulator_match_table[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators",
+		.data = pm8998_vreg_data,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-rpmh-regulators",
+		.data = pmi8998_vreg_data,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "qcom,pm8005-rpmh-regulators",
+		.data = pm8005_vreg_data,
+	},
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpmh_regulator_match_table);
+
+static struct platform_driver rpmh_regulator_driver = {
+	.driver		= {
+		.name		= "qcom-rpmh-regulator",
+		.of_match_table	= of_match_ptr(rpmh_regulator_match_table),
+	},
+	.probe		= rpmh_regulator_probe,
+	.remove		= rpmh_regulator_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(rpmh_regulator_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm RPMh regulator driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [v2,2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Matthias Kaehlcke]

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:50:35PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> Add the QCOM RPMh regulator driver to manage PMIC regulators
> which are controlled via RPMh on some Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
> SoCs.  RPMh is a hardware block which contains several
> accelerators which are used to manage various hardware resources
> that are shared between the processors of the SoC.  The final
> hardware state of a regulator is determined within RPMh by
> performing max aggregation of the requests made by all of the
> processors.
> 
> Add support for PMIC regulator control via the voltage regulator
> manager (VRM) and oscillator buffer (XOB) RPMh accelerators.  VRM
> supports manipulation of enable state, voltage, mode, and
> headroom voltage.  XOB supports manipulation of enable state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/Kconfig               |   9 +
>  drivers/regulator/Makefile              |   1 +
>  drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c | 910 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 920 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
> index 097f617..e0ecd0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
> @@ -671,6 +671,15 @@ config REGULATOR_QCOM_RPM
>  	  Qualcomm RPM as a module. The module will be named
>  	  "qcom_rpm-regulator".
>  
> +config REGULATOR_QCOM_RPMH
> +	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. RPMh regulator driver"
> +	depends on (QCOM_RPMH && QCOM_COMMAND_DB && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
> +	help
> +	  This driver supports control of PMIC regulators via the RPMh hardware
> +	  block found on Qualcomm Technologies Inc. SoCs.  RPMh regulator
> +	  control allows for voting on regulator state between multiple
> +	  processors within the SoC.
> +
>  config REGULATOR_QCOM_SMD_RPM
>  	tristate "Qualcomm SMD based RPM regulator driver"
>  	depends on QCOM_SMD_RPM
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Makefile b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
> index 590674f..c2274dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6323)	+= mt6323-regulator.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6380)	+= mt6380-regulator.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6397)	+= mt6397-regulator.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_RPM) += qcom_rpm-regulator.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_RPMH) += qcom_rpmh-regulator.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_SMD_RPM) += qcom_smd-regulator.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_SPMI) += qcom_spmi-regulator.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS) += palmas-regulator.o
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..03b1301
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,910 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
> +
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
> +
> +#include <soc/qcom/cmd-db.h>
> +#include <soc/qcom/rpmh.h>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * enum rpmh_regulator_type - supported RPMh accelerator types
> + * %VRM:	RPMh VRM accelerator which supports voting on enable, voltage,
> + *		mode, and headroom voltage of LDO, SMPS, and BOB type PMIC
> + *		regulators.
> + * %XOB:	RPMh XOB accelerator which supports voting on the enable state
> + *		of PMIC regulators.
> + */
> +enum rpmh_regulator_type {
> +	VRM,
> +	XOB,
> +};
> +
> +#define RPMH_VRM_HEADROOM_MAX_UV		511000
> +
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE		0x0
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_ENABLE		0x4
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_MODE		0x8
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_HEADROOM		0xC
> +
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_DISABLE			0x0
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_ENABLE			0x1
> +
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT		4
> +
> +/**
> + * struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data - RPMh regulator hardware configurations
> + * @regulator_type:		RPMh accelerator type used to manage this
> + *				regulator
> + * @ops:			Pointer to regulator ops callback structure
> + * @voltage_range:		The single range of voltages supported by this
> + *				PMIC regulator type
> + * @n_voltages:			The number of unique voltage set points defined
> + *				by voltage_range
> + * @pmic_mode_map:		Array indexed by regulator framework mode
> + *				containing PMIC hardware modes.  Must be large
> + *				enough to index all framework modes supported
> + *				by this regulator hardware type.
> + * @of_map_mode:		Maps an RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_* mode value defined
> + *				in device tree to a regulator framework mode

The name of the field is a bit misleading, this is a map of RPMh mode
to regulator framework mode, the device tree just happens to be the
place where this mapping is defined.

> + * @bypass_mode:		VRM PMIC mode value corresponding to bypass
> + *				(pass-through) for this regulator.  Only used
> + *				by BOB type via VRM.
> + */
> +struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data {
> +	enum rpmh_regulator_type		regulator_type;
> +	const struct regulator_ops		*ops;
> +	const struct regulator_linear_range	voltage_range;
> +	int					n_voltages;
> +	const u32				*pmic_mode_map;
> +	unsigned int			      (*of_map_mode)(unsigned int mode);
> +	u32					bypass_mode;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct rpmh_vreg - individual rpmh regulator data structure encapsulating a
> + *		single regulator device
> + * @rpmh_client:		Handle used for rpmh communications

nit: RPMh

> + * @addr:			Base address of the regulator resource within
> + *				an RPMh accelerator
> + * @rdesc:			Regulator descriptor
> + * @hw_data:			PMIC regulator configuration data for this RPMh
> + *				regulator
> + * @regulator_type:		RPMh accelerator type for this regulator
> + *				resource
> + * @always_wait_for_ack:	Boolean flag indicating if a request must always
> + *				wait for an ACK from RPMh before continuing even
> + *				if it corresponds to a strictly lower power
> + *				state (e.g. enabled --> disabled).
> + * @drms_mode:			Array of regulator framework modes which can
> + *				be configured dynamically for this regulator
> + *				via the set_load() callback.
> + * @drms_mode_max_uA:		Array of maximum load currents in microamps
> + *				supported by the corresponding modes in
> + *				drms_mode.  Elements must be specified in
> + *				strictly increasing order.
> + * @drms_mode_count:		The number of elements in drms_mode array.
> + * @enabled:			Boolean indicating if the regulator is enabled
> + *				or not
> + * @voltage_selector:		Selector used for get_voltage_sel() and
> + *				set_voltage_sel() callbacks
> + * @mode:			RPMh VRM regulator current framework mode
> + * @bypassed:			Boolean indicating if the regulator is in
> + *				bypass (pass-through) mode or not.  This is
> + *				only used by BOB rpmh-regulator resources.
> + */
> +struct rpmh_vreg {
> +	struct rpmh_client		*rpmh_client;
> +	u32				addr;
> +	struct regulator_desc		rdesc;
> +	const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data	*hw_data;
> +	enum rpmh_regulator_type	regulator_type;

This value is already available via rpmh_vreg->hw_data->regulator_type,
why duplicate it? The field is assigned in rpmh_regulator_init_vreg()
and only read once in the same function, there seems to be no need for
it, not even to improve readability.

> +	bool				always_wait_for_ack;
> +	unsigned int			*drms_mode;
> +	int				*drms_mode_max_uA;
> +	size_t				drms_mode_count;
> +
> +	bool				enabled;
> +	int				voltage_selector;
> +	unsigned int			mode;
> +	bool				bypassed;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct rpmh_vreg_init_data - initialization data for an RPMh regulator
> + * @name:			Name for the regulator which also corresponds
> + *				to the device tree subnode name of the regulator
> + * @resource_name:		RPMh regulator resource name format string.
> + *				This must include exactly one field: '%s' which
> + *				is filled at run-time with the PMIC ID provided
> + *				by device tree property qcom,pmic-id.  Example:
> + *				"ldo%s1" for RPMh resource "ldoa1".
> + * @supply_name:		Parent supply regulator name
> + * @hw_data:			Configuration data for this PMIC regulator type
> + */
> +struct rpmh_vreg_init_data {
> +	const char			*name;
> +	const char			*resource_name;
> +	const char			*supply_name;
> +	const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data	*hw_data;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * rpmh_regulator_send_request() - send the request to RPMh
> + * @vreg:		Pointer to the RPMh regulator
> + * @cmd:		RPMh commands to send
> + * @count:		Size of cmd array
> + * @wait_for_ack:	Boolean indicating if execution must wait until the
> + *			request has been acknowledged as complete
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
> + */
> +static int rpmh_regulator_send_request(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
> +			struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int count, bool wait_for_ack)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (wait_for_ack || vreg->always_wait_for_ack)
> +		ret = rpmh_write(vreg->rpmh_client,
> +				RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE, cmd, count);
> +	else
> +		ret = rpmh_write_async(vreg->rpmh_client,
> +				RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE, cmd, count);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> +	return vreg->enabled;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +	struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
> +		.addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_ENABLE,
> +		.data = RPMH_REGULATOR_ENABLE,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1, true);
> +
> +	if (!ret)
> +		vreg->enabled = true;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +	struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
> +		.addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_ENABLE,
> +		.data = RPMH_REGULATOR_DISABLE,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1, false);
> +
> +	if (!ret)
> +		vreg->enabled = false;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> +				unsigned int selector)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +	struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
> +		.addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* VRM voltage control register is set with voltage in millivolts. */
> +	cmd.data = DIV_ROUND_UP(regulator_list_voltage_linear_range(rdev,
> +							selector), 1000);
> +
> +	ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1,
> +					  selector > vreg->voltage_selector);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		vreg->voltage_selector = selector;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> +	return vreg->voltage_selector;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
> +					unsigned int mode, bool bypassed)
> +{
> +	struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
> +		.addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_MODE,
> +	};
> +
> +	cmd.data = bypassed ? vreg->hw_data->bypass_mode
> +			    : vreg->hw_data->pmic_mode_map[mode];
> +
> +	return rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> +					unsigned int mode)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (mode == vreg->mode)
> +		return 0;
> +	else if (mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(vreg, mode, vreg->bypassed);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		vreg->mode = mode;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> +	return vreg->mode;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int load_uA)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < vreg->drms_mode_count - 1; i++)
> +		if (load_uA < vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i])

Shouldn't this be '<='?

nit: IMO 'vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i] >= load_uA' would be more readable.

> +			break;
> +
> +	return rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode(rdev, vreg->drms_mode[i]);
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> +				bool enable)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (vreg->bypassed == enable)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(vreg, vreg->mode, enable);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		vreg->bypassed = enable;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> +				bool *enable)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> +	*enable = vreg->bypassed;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regulator_ops rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops = {
> +	.enable			= rpmh_regulator_enable,
> +	.disable		= rpmh_regulator_disable,
> +	.is_enabled		= rpmh_regulator_is_enabled,
> +	.set_voltage_sel	= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_voltage_sel,
> +	.get_voltage_sel	= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_voltage_sel,
> +	.list_voltage		= regulator_list_voltage_linear_range,
> +	.set_mode		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode,
> +	.get_mode		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_mode,
> +	.set_load		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regulator_ops rpmh_regulator_vrm_bypass_ops = {
> +	.enable			= rpmh_regulator_enable,
> +	.disable		= rpmh_regulator_disable,
> +	.is_enabled		= rpmh_regulator_is_enabled,
> +	.set_voltage_sel	= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_voltage_sel,
> +	.get_voltage_sel	= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_voltage_sel,
> +	.list_voltage		= regulator_list_voltage_linear_range,
> +	.set_mode		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode,
> +	.get_mode		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_mode,
> +	.set_load		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load,
> +	.set_bypass		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_bypass,
> +	.get_bypass		= rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_bypass,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regulator_ops rpmh_regulator_xob_ops = {
> +	.enable			= rpmh_regulator_enable,
> +	.disable		= rpmh_regulator_disable,
> +	.is_enabled		= rpmh_regulator_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes() - parse the supported mode configurations
> + *		for a VRM RPMh resource from device tree
> + * vreg:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + * dev:			Pointer to the top level rpmh-regulator PMIC device
> + * node:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + *			device node
> + *
> + * This function initializes the drms_mode[] and drms_mode_max_uA[] arrays of
> + * vreg based upon the values of optional device tree properties.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
> + */
> +static int rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
> +				struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	const char *prop;
> +	int i, len, ret, mode;
> +	u32 *buf;
> +
> +	/* qcom,allowed-drms-modes is optional */
> +	prop = "qcom,allowed-drms-modes";
> +	len = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, prop, sizeof(u32));
> +	if (len < 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	vreg->drms_mode = devm_kcalloc(dev, len, sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode),
> +					GFP_KERNEL);
> +	vreg->drms_mode_max_uA = devm_kcalloc(dev, len,
> +				   sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode_max_uA), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vreg->drms_mode || !vreg->drms_mode_max_uA)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	vreg->drms_mode_count = len;
> +
> +	buf = kcalloc(len, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!buf)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, prop, buf, len);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: unable to read %s, ret=%d\n",
> +			node->name, prop, ret);
> +		goto done;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> +		mode = vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode(buf[i]);
> +		if (mode <= 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "%s: element %d of %s = %u is invalid for this regulator\n",
> +				node->name, i, prop, buf[i]);
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto done;
> +		}
> +
> +		vreg->drms_mode[i] = mode;
> +	}
> +
> +	prop = "qcom,drms-mode-threshold-currents";
> +	len = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, prop, sizeof(u32));
> +	if (len != vreg->drms_mode_count) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: invalid element count=%d for %s\n",
> +			node->name, len, prop);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto done;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, prop, buf, len);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: unable to read %s, ret=%d\n",
> +			node->name, prop, ret);
> +		goto done;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> +		vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i] = buf[i];
> +
> +		if (i > 0 && vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i]
> +				<= vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i - 1]) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "%s: %s elements are not in ascending order\n",
> +				node->name, prop);
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto done;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +done:
> +	kfree(buf);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters() - initialize the RPMh resource
> + *		request for this regulator based on optional device tree
> + *		properties
> + * vreg:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + * dev:			Pointer to the top level rpmh-regulator PMIC device
> + * node:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + *			device node
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
> + */
> +static int rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
> +				struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct tcs_cmd cmd[2] = {};
> +	const struct regulator_linear_range *range;
> +	const char *prop;
> +	int cmd_count = 0;
> +	int ret, selector;
> +	u32 uV;
> +
> +	if (vreg->hw_data->regulator_type == VRM) {
> +		prop = "qcom,headroom-voltage";
> +		ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			if (uV > RPMH_VRM_HEADROOM_MAX_UV) {
> +				dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
> +					node->name, prop, uV);
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
> +
> +			cmd[cmd_count].addr
> +				= vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_HEADROOM;
> +			cmd[cmd_count++].data = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV, 1000);
> +		}
> +
> +		prop = "qcom,regulator-initial-voltage";
> +		ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			range = &vreg->hw_data->voltage_range;
> +			selector = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - range->min_uV,
> +					range->uV_step) + range->min_sel;
> +			if (uV < range->min_uV || selector > range->max_sel) {
> +				dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
> +					node->name, prop, uV);
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
> +
> +			vreg->voltage_selector = selector;
> +
> +			cmd[cmd_count].addr
> +				= vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE;
> +			cmd[cmd_count++].data
> +				= DIV_ROUND_UP(selector * range->uV_step
> +						+ range->min_uV, 1000);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (cmd_count) {
> +		ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, cmd, cmd_count, true);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "%s: could not send default config, ret=%d\n",
> +				node->name, ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * rpmh_regulator_init_vreg() - initialize all attributes of an rpmh-regulator
> + * vreg:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + * dev:			Pointer to the top level rpmh-regulator PMIC device
> + * node:		Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + *			device node
> + * pmic_id:		String used to identify the top level rpmh-regulator
> + *			PMIC device on the board
> + * rpmh_data:		Pointer to a null-terminated array of rpmh-regulator
> + *			resources defined for the top level PMIC device
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
> + */
> +static int rpmh_regulator_init_vreg(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg, struct device *dev,
> +				struct device_node *node, const char *pmic_id,
> +				const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *rpmh_data)
> +{
> +	struct regulator_config reg_config = {};
> +	char rpmh_resource_name[20] = "";
> +	struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> +	enum rpmh_regulator_type type;
> +	struct regulator_init_data *init_data;
> +	unsigned int mode;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	for (; rpmh_data->name; rpmh_data++)
> +		if (!strcmp(rpmh_data->name, node->name))
> +			break;
> +
> +	if (!rpmh_data->name) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Unknown regulator %s\n", node->name);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	scnprintf(rpmh_resource_name, sizeof(rpmh_resource_name),
> +		rpmh_data->resource_name, pmic_id);
> +
> +	vreg->addr = cmd_db_read_addr(rpmh_resource_name);
> +	if (!vreg->addr) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: could not find RPMh address for resource %s\n",
> +			node->name, rpmh_resource_name);
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	vreg->rdesc.name = rpmh_data->name;
> +	vreg->rdesc.supply_name = rpmh_data->supply_name;
> +	vreg->regulator_type = rpmh_data->hw_data->regulator_type;
> +	vreg->hw_data = rpmh_data->hw_data;
> +
> +	if (rpmh_data->hw_data->n_voltages) {
> +		vreg->rdesc.linear_ranges = &rpmh_data->hw_data->voltage_range;
> +		vreg->rdesc.n_linear_ranges = 1;
> +		vreg->rdesc.n_voltages = rpmh_data->hw_data->n_voltages;
> +	}
> +
> +	type = vreg->regulator_type;
> +
> +	if (type == VRM) {
> +		ret = rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes(vreg, dev, node);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	vreg->always_wait_for_ack = of_property_read_bool(node,
> +						"qcom,always-wait-for-ack");
> +
> +	vreg->rdesc.owner	= THIS_MODULE;
> +	vreg->rdesc.type	= REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
> +	vreg->rdesc.ops		= vreg->hw_data->ops;
> +	vreg->rdesc.of_map_mode	= vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode;
> +
> +	init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(dev, node, &vreg->rdesc);
> +	if (!init_data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (type == XOB && init_data->constraints.min_uV) {
> +		vreg->rdesc.fixed_uV = init_data->constraints.min_uV;
> +		vreg->rdesc.n_voltages = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode) {
> +		init_data->constraints.valid_ops_mask |= REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE;
> +		for (i = 0; i < RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT; i++) {
> +			mode = vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode(i);
> +			if (mode > 0)
> +				init_data->constraints.valid_modes_mask |= mode;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	reg_config.dev		= dev;
> +	reg_config.init_data	= init_data;
> +	reg_config.of_node	= node;
> +	reg_config.driver_data	= vreg;
> +
> +	ret = rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters(vreg, dev, node);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, &vreg->rdesc, &reg_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(rdev);
> +		rdev = NULL;
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: devm_regulator_register() failed, ret=%d\n",
> +			node->name, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "%s regulator registered for RPMh resource %s @ 0x%05X\n",
> +		node->name, rpmh_resource_name, vreg->addr);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = 4,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 5,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = -EINVAL,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 7,
> +};

Define constants for the modes on the PMIC4 side?

> +
> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_ldo_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
> +{
> +	static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = -EINVAL,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (mode >= RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return of_mode_map[mode];
> +}
> +
> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = 4,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 5,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = 6,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 7,
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_smps_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
> +{
> +	static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (mode >= RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return of_mode_map[mode];
> +}
> +
> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_bob[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = -EINVAL,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 1,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = 2,
> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 3,
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
> +{
> +	static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = -EINVAL,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
> +		[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (mode >= RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return of_mode_map[mode];
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_pldo = {
> +	.regulator_type = VRM,
> +	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
> +	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1664000, 0, 255, 8000),
> +	.n_voltages = 256,
> +	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo,
> +	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_ldo_of_map_mode,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_pldo_lv = {
> +	.regulator_type = VRM,
> +	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
> +	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1256000, 0, 127, 8000),
> +	.n_voltages = 128,
> +	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo,
> +	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_ldo_of_map_mode,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_nldo = {
> +	.regulator_type = VRM,
> +	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
> +	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(312000, 0, 127, 8000),
> +	.n_voltages = 128,
> +	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo,
> +	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_ldo_of_map_mode,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_hfsmps3 = {
> +	.regulator_type = VRM,
> +	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
> +	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(320000, 0, 215, 8000),
> +	.n_voltages = 216,
> +	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps,
> +	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_smps_of_map_mode,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_ftsmps426 = {
> +	.regulator_type = VRM,
> +	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_ops,
> +	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(320000, 0, 258, 4000),
> +	.n_voltages = 259,
> +	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps,
> +	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_smps_of_map_mode,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_bob = {
> +	.regulator_type = VRM,
> +	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_bypass_ops,
> +	.voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1824000, 0, 83, 32000),
> +	.n_voltages = 84,
> +	.pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_bob,
> +	.of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode,
> +	.bypass_mode = 0,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_lvs = {
> +	.regulator_type = XOB,
> +	.ops = &rpmh_regulator_xob_ops,
> +	/* LVS hardware does not support voltage or mode configuration. */
> +};
> +
> +#define RPMH_VREG(_name, _resource_name, _hw_data, _supply_name) \
> +{ \
> +	.name		= _name, \
> +	.resource_name	= _resource_name, \
> +	.hw_data	= _hw_data, \
> +	.supply_name	= _supply_name, \
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8998_vreg_data[] = {
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps1",  "smp%s1",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s1"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps2",  "smp%s2",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s2"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps3",  "smp%s3",  &pmic4_hfsmps3,   "vdd_s3"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps4",  "smp%s4",  &pmic4_hfsmps3,   "vdd_s4"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps5",  "smp%s5",  &pmic4_hfsmps3,   "vdd_s5"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps6",  "smp%s6",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s6"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps7",  "smp%s7",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s7"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps8",  "smp%s8",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s8"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps9",  "smp%s9",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s9"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps10", "smp%s10", &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s10"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps11", "smp%s11", &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s11"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps12", "smp%s12", &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s12"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps13", "smp%s13", &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s13"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo1",   "ldo%s1",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l1_l27"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo2",   "ldo%s2",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l2_l8_l17"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo3",   "ldo%s3",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l3_l11"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo4",   "ldo%s4",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l4_l5"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo5",   "ldo%s5",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l4_l5"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo6",   "ldo%s6",  &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l6"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo7",   "ldo%s7",  &pmic4_pldo_lv,   "vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo8",   "ldo%s8",  &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l2_l8_l17"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo9",   "ldo%s9",  &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l9"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo10",  "ldo%s10", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l10_l23_l25"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo11",  "ldo%s11", &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l3_l11"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo12",  "ldo%s12", &pmic4_pldo_lv,   "vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo13",  "ldo%s13", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l13_l19_l21"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo14",  "ldo%s14", &pmic4_pldo_lv,   "vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo15",  "ldo%s15", &pmic4_pldo_lv,   "vdd_l7_l12_l14_l15"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo16",  "ldo%s16", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l16_l28"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo17",  "ldo%s17", &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l2_l8_l17"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo18",  "ldo%s18", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l18_l22"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo19",  "ldo%s19", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l13_l19_l21"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo20",  "ldo%s20", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l20_l24"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo21",  "ldo%s21", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l13_l19_l21"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo22",  "ldo%s22", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l18_l22"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo23",  "ldo%s23", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l10_l23_l25"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo24",  "ldo%s24", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l20_l24"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo25",  "ldo%s25", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l10_l23_l25"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo26",  "ldo%s26", &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l26"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo27",  "ldo%s27", &pmic4_nldo,      "vdd_l1_l27"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("ldo28",  "ldo%s28", &pmic4_pldo,      "vdd_l16_l28"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("lvs1",   "vs%s1",   &pmic4_lvs,       "vdd_lvs1_lvs2"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("lvs2",   "vs%s2",   &pmic4_lvs,       "vdd_lvs1_lvs2"),
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pmi8998_vreg_data[] = {
> +	RPMH_VREG("bob",    "bob%s1",  &pmic4_bob,       "vdd_bob"),
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8005_vreg_data[] = {
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps1",  "smp%s1",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s1"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps2",  "smp%s2",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s2"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps3",  "smp%s3",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s3"),
> +	RPMH_VREG("smps4",  "smp%s4",  &pmic4_ftsmps426, "vdd_s4"),
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *vreg_data;
> +	struct rpmh_client *rpmh_client;
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg;
> +	const char *pmic_id;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = cmd_db_ready();
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			dev_err(dev, "Command DB not available, ret=%d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	vreg_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!vreg_data)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "qcom,pmic-id", &pmic_id);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "qcom,pmic-id missing in DT node\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	rpmh_client = rpmh_get_client(pdev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rpmh_client))
> +		return PTR_ERR(rpmh_client);
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpmh_client);
> +
> +	for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, node) {
> +		vreg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*vreg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!vreg) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			of_node_put(node);
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +
> +		vreg->rpmh_client = rpmh_client;
> +
> +		ret = rpmh_regulator_init_vreg(vreg, dev, node, pmic_id,
> +						vreg_data);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			of_node_put(node);
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	rpmh_release(rpmh_client);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct rpmh_client *rpmh_client = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	rpmh_release(rpmh_client);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rpmh_regulator_match_table[] = {
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators",
> +		.data = pm8998_vreg_data,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-rpmh-regulators",
> +		.data = pmi8998_vreg_data,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "qcom,pm8005-rpmh-regulators",
> +		.data = pm8005_vreg_data,
> +	},
> +	{}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpmh_regulator_match_table);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rpmh_regulator_driver = {
> +	.driver		= {
> +		.name		= "qcom-rpmh-regulator",
> +		.of_match_table	= of_match_ptr(rpmh_regulator_match_table),
> +	},
> +	.probe		= rpmh_regulator_probe,
> +	.remove		= rpmh_regulator_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(rpmh_regulator_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm RPMh regulator driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

Re: [v2,2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

On 04/17/2018 11:23 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:50:35PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> Add the QCOM RPMh regulator driver to manage PMIC regulators
>> which are controlled via RPMh on some Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
>> SoCs.  RPMh is a hardware block which contains several
>> accelerators which are used to manage various hardware resources
>> that are shared between the processors of the SoC.  The final
>> hardware state of a regulator is determined within RPMh by
>> performing max aggregation of the requests made by all of the
>> processors.
>> [...]
>> +/**
>> + * struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data - RPMh regulator hardware configurations
>> + * @regulator_type:		RPMh accelerator type used to manage this
>> + *				regulator
>> + * @ops:			Pointer to regulator ops callback structure
>> + * @voltage_range:		The single range of voltages supported by this
>> + *				PMIC regulator type
>> + * @n_voltages:			The number of unique voltage set points defined
>> + *				by voltage_range
>> + * @pmic_mode_map:		Array indexed by regulator framework mode
>> + *				containing PMIC hardware modes.  Must be large
>> + *				enough to index all framework modes supported
>> + *				by this regulator hardware type.
>> + * @of_map_mode:		Maps an RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_* mode value defined
>> + *				in device tree to a regulator framework mode
> 
> The name of the field is a bit misleading, this is a map of RPMh mode
> to regulator framework mode, the device tree just happens to be the
> place where this mapping is defined.

of_map_mode name is used here to match the struct regulator_desc field by
the same name that it is assigned to [1].  Do you think that the name
should be changed to something else?


>> +/**
>> + * struct rpmh_vreg - individual rpmh regulator data structure encapsulating a
>> + *		single regulator device
>> + * @rpmh_client:		Handle used for rpmh communications
> 
> nit: RPMh

I'll change this.


>> +struct rpmh_vreg {
>> +	struct rpmh_client		*rpmh_client;
>> +	u32				addr;
>> +	struct regulator_desc		rdesc;
>> +	const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data	*hw_data;
>> +	enum rpmh_regulator_type	regulator_type;
> 
> This value is already available via rpmh_vreg->hw_data->regulator_type,
> why duplicate it? The field is assigned in rpmh_regulator_init_vreg()
> and only read once in the same function, there seems to be no need for
> it, not even to improve readability.

This is present to specifically allow for a future change to support
overriding the regulator_type value from device tree in order to force
RPMh resources to be handled via XOB instead of VRM in a board-specific
manner.  I included support of the property qcom,rpmh-resource-type in the
first version of this patch.  I removed this property from the second
version of the patch based upon review feedback since SDM845 does not
explicitly need it (though an upcoming chip will).

I'll remove regulator_type from struct rpmh_vreg.  It shouldn't be
particularly painful to add it back in when needed for XOB override support.


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int load_uA)
>> +{
>> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < vreg->drms_mode_count - 1; i++)
>> +		if (load_uA < vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i])
> 
> Shouldn't this be '<='?
> 
> nit: IMO 'vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i] >= load_uA' would be more readable.

I chose to use '<' here in order to maintain the non-inclusive limit
semantics of the downstream RPMh regulator driver.  E.g. with an LPM
threshold of 10000 uA, load_uA == 10000 would result in a request for HPM
instead of LPM.

I suppose that I can change this to '<=' to be more logically consistent.


>> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
>> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = 4,
>> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 5,
>> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = -EINVAL,
>> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 7,
>> +};
> 
> Define constants for the modes on the PMIC4 side?

Are you suggesting something like this?

#define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_RETENTION	4
#define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_LPM		5
#define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_HPM		7

static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_RETENTION,
	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_LPM,
	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = -EINVAL,
	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_HPM,
};

#define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_RETENTION	4
#define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PFM		5
#define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_AUTO		6
#define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PWM		7

static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_RETENTION,
	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PFM,
	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_AUTO,
	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PWM,
};

I considered using this approach, but it didn't seem like it increased
readability and did increase the line count.  Each of the constants would
only be used once.  Would you prefer this style (or something else)?

Thanks,
David

[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/regulator/driver.h?h=v4.17-rc1#n370

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [v2,2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Matthias Kaehlcke]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:15:18PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> On 04/17/2018 11:23 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:50:35PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> >> Add the QCOM RPMh regulator driver to manage PMIC regulators
> >> which are controlled via RPMh on some Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
> >> SoCs.  RPMh is a hardware block which contains several
> >> accelerators which are used to manage various hardware resources
> >> that are shared between the processors of the SoC.  The final
> >> hardware state of a regulator is determined within RPMh by
> >> performing max aggregation of the requests made by all of the
> >> processors.
> >> [...]
> >> +/**
> >> + * struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data - RPMh regulator hardware configurations
> >> + * @regulator_type:		RPMh accelerator type used to manage this
> >> + *				regulator
> >> + * @ops:			Pointer to regulator ops callback structure
> >> + * @voltage_range:		The single range of voltages supported by this
> >> + *				PMIC regulator type
> >> + * @n_voltages:			The number of unique voltage set points defined
> >> + *				by voltage_range
> >> + * @pmic_mode_map:		Array indexed by regulator framework mode
> >> + *				containing PMIC hardware modes.  Must be large
> >> + *				enough to index all framework modes supported
> >> + *				by this regulator hardware type.
> >> + * @of_map_mode:		Maps an RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_* mode value defined
> >> + *				in device tree to a regulator framework mode
> > 
> > The name of the field is a bit misleading, this is a map of RPMh mode
> > to regulator framework mode, the device tree just happens to be the
> > place where this mapping is defined.
> 
> of_map_mode name is used here to match the struct regulator_desc field by
> the same name that it is assigned to [1].  Do you think that the name
> should be changed to something else?

Thanks, I missed that it's the name of the field in struct
regulator_desc field, in that case it certainly makes sense to use the
same name.

> >> +/**
> >> + * struct rpmh_vreg - individual rpmh regulator data structure encapsulating a
> >> + *		single regulator device
> >> + * @rpmh_client:		Handle used for rpmh communications
> > 
> > nit: RPMh
> 
> I'll change this.
> 
> 
> >> +struct rpmh_vreg {
> >> +	struct rpmh_client		*rpmh_client;
> >> +	u32				addr;
> >> +	struct regulator_desc		rdesc;
> >> +	const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data	*hw_data;
> >> +	enum rpmh_regulator_type	regulator_type;
> > 
> > This value is already available via rpmh_vreg->hw_data->regulator_type,
> > why duplicate it? The field is assigned in rpmh_regulator_init_vreg()
> > and only read once in the same function, there seems to be no need for
> > it, not even to improve readability.
> 
> This is present to specifically allow for a future change to support
> overriding the regulator_type value from device tree in order to force
> RPMh resources to be handled via XOB instead of VRM in a board-specific
> manner.  I included support of the property qcom,rpmh-resource-type in the
> first version of this patch.  I removed this property from the second
> version of the patch based upon review feedback since SDM845 does not
> explicitly need it (though an upcoming chip will).
> 
> I'll remove regulator_type from struct rpmh_vreg.  It shouldn't be
> particularly painful to add it back in when needed for XOB override support.
> 
> 
> >> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int load_uA)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> >> +	int i;
> >> +
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < vreg->drms_mode_count - 1; i++)
> >> +		if (load_uA < vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i])
> > 
> > Shouldn't this be '<='?
> > 
> > nit: IMO 'vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i] >= load_uA' would be more readable.
> 
> I chose to use '<' here in order to maintain the non-inclusive limit
> semantics of the downstream RPMh regulator driver.  E.g. with an LPM
> threshold of 10000 uA, load_uA == 10000 would result in a request for HPM
> instead of LPM.
> 
> I suppose that I can change this to '<=' to be more logically consistent.
> 
> 
> >> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
> >> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = 4,
> >> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 5,
> >> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = -EINVAL,
> >> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 7,
> >> +};
> > 
> > Define constants for the modes on the PMIC4 side?
> 
> Are you suggesting something like this?
> 
> #define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_RETENTION	4
> #define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_LPM		5
> #define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_HPM		7
> 
> static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_RETENTION,
> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_LPM,
> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = -EINVAL,
> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_HPM,
> };
> 
> #define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_RETENTION	4
> #define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PFM		5
> #define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_AUTO		6
> #define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PWM		7
> 
> static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_RETENTION,
> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PFM,
> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_AUTO,
> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PWM,
> };
> 
> I considered using this approach, but it didn't seem like it increased
> readability and did increase the line count.  Each of the constants would
> only be used once.  Would you prefer this style (or something else)?

Personally I prefer this style, since the constants are more
expressive than the literals. I agree that the 'inline' constant
definition is a bit noisy, perhaps it would be better to move the
definitions to the top of the file or group them before the definition
of pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo. Alteratively you could create a
drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.h and also move the definitions
of struct struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data, rpmh_vreg, ... there.

Thanks

Matthias

Re: [v2,2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

On 04/17/2018 12:47 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:15:18PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> On 04/17/2018 11:23 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:50:35PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
>>>> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = 4,
>>>> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = 5,
>>>> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = -EINVAL,
>>>> +	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = 7,
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> Define constants for the modes on the PMIC4 side?
>>
>> Are you suggesting something like this?
>>
>> #define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_RETENTION	4
>> #define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_LPM		5
>> #define PMIC4_LDO_MODE_HPM		7
>>
>> static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
>> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_RETENTION,
>> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_LPM,
>> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = -EINVAL,
>> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = PMIC4_LDO_MODE_HPM,
>> };
>>
>> #define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_RETENTION	4
>> #define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PFM		5
>> #define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_AUTO		6
>> #define PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PWM		7
>>
>> static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_smps[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
>> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY] = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_RETENTION,
>> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE]    = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PFM,
>> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL]  = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_AUTO,
>> 	[REGULATOR_MODE_FAST]    = PMIC4_SMPS_MODE_PWM,
>> };
>>
>> I considered using this approach, but it didn't seem like it increased
>> readability and did increase the line count.  Each of the constants would
>> only be used once.  Would you prefer this style (or something else)?
> 
> Personally I prefer this style, since the constants are more
> expressive than the literals. I agree that the 'inline' constant
> definition is a bit noisy, perhaps it would be better to move the
> definitions to the top of the file or group them before the definition
> of pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo. Alteratively you could create a
> drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.h and also move the definitions
> of struct struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data, rpmh_vreg, ... there.

I'll add constants for the per-type regulator modes at the top of the
file.  We'll see if other reviewers like them.

Take care,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [v2,2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 546 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:23:47AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:50:35PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> > Add the QCOM RPMh regulator driver to manage PMIC regulators
> > which are controlled via RPMh on some Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
> > SoCs.  RPMh is a hardware block which contains several

Please delete unneeded context from mails when replying.  Doing this
makes it much easier to find your reply in the message, helping ensure
it won't be missed by people scrolling through the irrelevant quoted
material.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_DISABLE                 0x0
> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_ENABLE                  0x1

In the last version Stephen said he didn't like the above two #defines
and you said you'd remove them, yet they are still here.  Explanation?


> + * @drms_mode:                 Array of regulator framework modes which can
> + *                             be configured dynamically for this regulator
> + *                             via the set_load() callback.

Using the singular for something that is an array is confusing.  Why
not "drms_modes" or "drms_mode_arr"?  In the past review you said
'Perhaps something along the lines of "drms_modes"'.


> +struct rpmh_vreg {
> +       struct rpmh_client              *rpmh_client;
> +       u32                             addr;
> +       struct regulator_desc           rdesc;
> +       const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data  *hw_data;
> +       enum rpmh_regulator_type        regulator_type;
> +       bool                            always_wait_for_ack;
> +       unsigned int                    *drms_mode;
> +       int                             *drms_mode_max_uA;
> +       size_t                          drms_mode_count;
> +
> +       bool                            enabled;
> +       int                             voltage_selector;
> +       unsigned int                    mode;
> +       bool                            bypassed;

nit: stick next to "enabled" to make slightly better structure packing...


> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> +                               unsigned int selector)
> +{
> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +       struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
> +               .addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE,
> +       };
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       /* VRM voltage control register is set with voltage in millivolts. */
> +       cmd.data = DIV_ROUND_UP(regulator_list_voltage_linear_range(rdev,
> +                                                       selector), 1000);
> +
> +       ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1,
> +                                         selector > vreg->voltage_selector);

If you init vreg->voltage_selector to an error as I suggest in
rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters() you'll need to handle it
here.  See below.


> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
> +                                       unsigned int mode, bool bypassed)
> +{
> +       struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
> +               .addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_MODE,
> +       };

Please add:

if (mode & ~(REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY |
     REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE |
     REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL |
     REGULATOR_MODE_FAST))
  return -EINVAL;

That way if someone adds a new mode you don't index off the end of
your array.  Ah, I see, you have this in rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode
by checking if mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY.  That works.  Can you
move it here so it's closer to where the array access is?


> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int load_uA)
> +{
> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +       int i;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < vreg->drms_mode_count - 1; i++)
> +               if (load_uA < vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i])
> +                       break;

Can you put a warning here if the requested load_uA is larger than the
largest supported, and/or perhaps consider it an error case?


> +
> +       return rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode(rdev, vreg->drms_mode[i]);

Might not hurt to have a comment saying that this calls
rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() instead of calling
rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass() directly because this is supposed
to change the mode returned by a future call to get_mode().


> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> +                               bool enable)
> +{
> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (vreg->bypassed == enable)
> +               return 0;

Just like for enable, remove this check.  The regulator core does it for you.


> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> +                               bool *enable)
> +{
> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> +       *enable = vreg->bypassed;
> +
> +       return 0;

Should you return an error code if nobody has ever called set_bypass?
...or is it OK to just return "not bypassed"?  Please document this in
the code.


> +static int rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
> +                               struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +       const char *prop;
> +       int i, len, ret, mode;
> +       u32 *buf;
> +
> +       /* qcom,allowed-drms-modes is optional */
> +       prop = "qcom,allowed-drms-modes";
> +       len = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, prop, sizeof(u32));
> +       if (len < 0)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       vreg->drms_mode = devm_kcalloc(dev, len, sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode),
> +                                       GFP_KERNEL);
> +       vreg->drms_mode_max_uA = devm_kcalloc(dev, len,
> +                                  sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode_max_uA), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!vreg->drms_mode || !vreg->drms_mode_max_uA)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +       vreg->drms_mode_count = len;
> +
> +       buf = kcalloc(len, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!buf)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, prop, buf, len);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "%s: unable to read %s, ret=%d\n",
> +                       node->name, prop, ret);
> +               goto done;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> +               mode = vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode(buf[i]);
> +               if (mode <= 0) {

Should be < 0, not <= 0 right?  Unless we take Javier's suggestion
(see <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10346081/>) and make 0 be
invalid...


> +/**
> + * rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters() - initialize the RPMh resource
> + *             request for this regulator based on optional device tree
> + *             properties
> + * vreg:               Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + * dev:                        Pointer to the top level rpmh-regulator PMIC device
> + * node:               Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + *                     device node
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
> + */
> +static int rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
> +                               struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +       struct tcs_cmd cmd[2] = {};
> +       const struct regulator_linear_range *range;
> +       const char *prop;
> +       int cmd_count = 0;
> +       int ret, selector;
> +       u32 uV;
> +
> +       if (vreg->hw_data->regulator_type == VRM) {
> +               prop = "qcom,headroom-voltage";
> +               ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
> +               if (!ret) {
> +                       if (uV > RPMH_VRM_HEADROOM_MAX_UV) {
> +                               dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
> +                                       node->name, prop, uV);
> +                               return -EINVAL;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       cmd[cmd_count].addr
> +                               = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_HEADROOM;
> +                       cmd[cmd_count++].data = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV, 1000);
> +               }
> +
> +               prop = "qcom,regulator-initial-voltage";
> +               ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
> +               if (!ret) {
> +                       range = &vreg->hw_data->voltage_range;
> +                       selector = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - range->min_uV,
> +                                       range->uV_step) + range->min_sel;
> +                       if (uV < range->min_uV || selector > range->max_sel) {
> +                               dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
> +                                       node->name, prop, uV);
> +                               return -EINVAL;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       vreg->voltage_selector = selector;
> +
> +                       cmd[cmd_count].addr
> +                               = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE;
> +                       cmd[cmd_count++].data
> +                               = DIV_ROUND_UP(selector * range->uV_step
> +                                               + range->min_uV, 1000);
> +               }

Seems like you want an "else { vreg->voltage_selector = -EINVAL; }".
Otherwise "get_voltage_sel" will return selector 0 before the first
set, right?

Previously Mark said: "If the driver can't read values it should
return an appropriate error code."
...and previously you said: "I'll try this out and see if the
regulator framework complains during regulator registration."


> +/**
> + * rpmh_regulator_init_vreg() - initialize all attributes of an rpmh-regulator
> + * vreg:               Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + * dev:                        Pointer to the top level rpmh-regulator PMIC device
> + * node:               Pointer to the individual rpmh-regulator resource
> + *                     device node
> + * pmic_id:            String used to identify the top level rpmh-regulator
> + *                     PMIC device on the board
> + * rpmh_data:          Pointer to a null-terminated array of rpmh-regulator
> + *                     resources defined for the top level PMIC device
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
> + */
> +static int rpmh_regulator_init_vreg(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg, struct device *dev,
> +                               struct device_node *node, const char *pmic_id,
> +                               const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *rpmh_data)
> +{
> +       struct regulator_config reg_config = {};
> +       char rpmh_resource_name[20] = "";
> +       struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> +       enum rpmh_regulator_type type;
> +       struct regulator_init_data *init_data;
> +       unsigned int mode;
> +       int i, ret;
> +
> +       for (; rpmh_data->name; rpmh_data++)
> +               if (!strcmp(rpmh_data->name, node->name))
> +                       break;
> +
> +       if (!rpmh_data->name) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "Unknown regulator %s\n", node->name);
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       scnprintf(rpmh_resource_name, sizeof(rpmh_resource_name),
> +               rpmh_data->resource_name, pmic_id);

If the resulting string is exactly 20 characters then
rpmh_resource_name won't be zero terminated.  Please handle this
properly.


> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {

I may have suggested using this as an array that could be used as a
"map" (index by regulator framework mode and get the PMIC mode), but
now that I see it it doesn't seem super appealing since the regulator
framework mode is not 0, 1, 2, 3 but is actually 1, 2, 4, 8.  ...but I
guess it's not too bad--you're allocating 9 ints to map 4 elements and
I guess that's about as efficient as you're going to get even if it
feels a bit ugly.

...but still a few improvements:

* Don't specify the size of the array as "REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1".
Let the compiler handle this.  It should do the right thing.  Then if
someone ever changes the order of the #defines things will just work,
I think.

* Make sure that users of these arrays check that the mode is one of
the mode you know about.  That way if someone does add a new mode you
don't index off your array.  I'll put a comment in the user.


Also: the type of this array is 'u32' but you're assigning -EINVAL in
some cases.  Please fix to be signed.  Here and on other similar
arrays.


> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
> +{
> +       static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = -EINVAL,
> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
> +       };

You're sticking a negative value in an array of unsigned inits.  Here
and in other similar functions.

I know, I know.  The function is defined to return an unsigned int.
It's wrong.  of_regulator.c clearly puts the return code in a signed
int.  First attempt at fixing this is at
<https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10346081/>.


> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_bob = {
> +       .regulator_type = VRM,
> +       .ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_bypass_ops,
> +       .voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1824000, 0, 83, 32000),
> +       .n_voltages = 84,
> +       .pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_bob,
> +       .of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode,
> +       .bypass_mode = 0,

Remove .bypass_mode from the structure and just change
rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass() to set 0 if we're in bypass.
Right now 100% of PMICs that support bypass use 0 as the bypass mode.
If you ever have a future PMIC that uses a non-zero mode for bypass
then we can always add this back.  ...and if no future PMICs ever use
a non-zero bypass mode then we don't need the complexity of having
another field in this struct.

If you don't do this you might get arguments from some people saying
that they don't like seeing inits of "= 0" in static structures (Linux
conventions seem to like you to just assume that structs are
zero-initted).


> +static int rpmh_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +       const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *vreg_data;
> +       struct rpmh_client *rpmh_client;
> +       struct device_node *node;
> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg;
> +       const char *pmic_id;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = cmd_db_ready();
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +                       dev_err(dev, "Command DB not available, ret=%d\n", ret);
> +               return ret;
> +       }

In the last patch Stephen said:

> We should just make rpmh parent device call cmd_db_ready() so that these
> devices aren't even populated until then and so that cmd_db_ready() is
> only in one place. Lina?

Any news here?


> +
> +       vreg_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +       if (!vreg_data)
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +
> +       ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "qcom,pmic-id", &pmic_id);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "qcom,pmic-id missing in DT node\n");
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       rpmh_client = rpmh_get_client(pdev);
> +       if (IS_ERR(rpmh_client))
> +               return PTR_ERR(rpmh_client);
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpmh_client);
> +
> +       for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, node) {
> +               vreg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*vreg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +               if (!vreg) {
> +                       ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                       of_node_put(node);
> +                       goto cleanup;
> +               }
> +
> +               vreg->rpmh_client = rpmh_client;
> +
> +               ret = rpmh_regulator_init_vreg(vreg, dev, node, pmic_id,
> +                                               vreg_data);
> +               if (ret < 0) {
> +                       of_node_put(node);
> +                       goto cleanup;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +
> +cleanup:
> +       rpmh_release(rpmh_client);

Still no devm_rpmh_get_client()?  If Lina is too busy spinning her
patch series for other stuff, just add it to RPMH as a patch in your
series.  I believe it's just this (untested):

---

int devm_rpmh_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
{
  struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
  rpmh_release(pdev);
}

int devm_rpmh_get_client(struct device *dev)
{
  struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
  void *dr;
  int rc;

  dr = devres_alloc(devm_rpmh_release, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
  if (!dr)
    return -ENOMEM;

  rc = rpmh_get_client(pdev);
  if (!rc)
    devres_add(dev, dr);
  else
    devres_free(dr);

  return rc;
}

---

Note that you'll get rid of the error handling in probe, the whole
remove function, and the need to do platform_set_drvdata().


-Doug

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

On 04/17/2018 01:02 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_DISABLE                 0x0
>> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_ENABLE                  0x1
> 
> In the last version Stephen said he didn't like the above two #defines
> and you said you'd remove them, yet they are still here.  Explanation?

I thought that he was referring to the comments above the constants since
his review comment was immediately following the second of two comments as
opposed to these constants.  I'll let him follow-up on this point if
necessary.


>> + * @drms_mode:                 Array of regulator framework modes which can
>> + *                             be configured dynamically for this regulator
>> + *                             via the set_load() callback.
> 
> Using the singular for something that is an array is confusing.  Why
> not "drms_modes" or "drms_mode_arr"?  In the past review you said
> 'Perhaps something along the lines of "drms_modes"'.

It seems awkward to me to use a plural for arrays as it leads to indexing
like this: vreg->drms_modes[i].  "mode i" seems better than "modes i".
However, I'm willing to change this to be drms_modes and drms_mode_max_uAs
if that style is preferred.


>> +struct rpmh_vreg {
>> +       struct rpmh_client              *rpmh_client;
>> +       u32                             addr;
>> +       struct regulator_desc           rdesc;
>> +       const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data  *hw_data;
>> +       enum rpmh_regulator_type        regulator_type;
>> +       bool                            always_wait_for_ack;
>> +       unsigned int                    *drms_mode;
>> +       int                             *drms_mode_max_uA;
>> +       size_t                          drms_mode_count;
>> +
>> +       bool                            enabled;
>> +       int                             voltage_selector;
>> +       unsigned int                    mode;
>> +       bool                            bypassed;
> 
> nit: stick next to "enabled" to make slightly better structure packing...

Ok


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>> +                               unsigned int selector)
>> +{
>> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> +       struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
>> +               .addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE,
>> +       };
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       /* VRM voltage control register is set with voltage in millivolts. */
>> +       cmd.data = DIV_ROUND_UP(regulator_list_voltage_linear_range(rdev,
>> +                                                       selector), 1000);
>> +
>> +       ret = rpmh_regulator_send_request(vreg, &cmd, 1,
>> +                                         selector > vreg->voltage_selector);
> 
> If you init vreg->voltage_selector to an error as I suggest in
> rpmh_regulator_load_default_parameters() you'll need to handle it
> here.  See below.

Ok


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
>> +                                       unsigned int mode, bool bypassed)
>> +{
>> +       struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
>> +               .addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_MODE,
>> +       };
> 
> Please add:
> 
> if (mode & ~(REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY |
>      REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE |
>      REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL |
>      REGULATOR_MODE_FAST))
>   return -EINVAL;
> 
> That way if someone adds a new mode you don't index off the end of
> your array.  Ah, I see, you have this in rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode
> by checking if mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY.  That works.  Can you
> move it here so it's closer to where the array access is?

Theoretically, the (mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY) check in
rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() shouldn't be necessary at all.  I felt safer
leaving it in though.  The framework ensures that no mode values may be
passed into rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() which is not identified in
constraints.valid_modes_mask.  Similar sanitization happens for internal
rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() calls.

I'll move the (mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY) check into
rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass().


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_load(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int load_uA)
>> +{
>> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> +       int i;
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i < vreg->drms_mode_count - 1; i++)
>> +               if (load_uA < vreg->drms_mode_max_uA[i])
>> +                       break;
> 
> Can you put a warning here if the requested load_uA is larger than the
> largest supported, and/or perhaps consider it an error case?

I'll add a warning.


>> +
>> +       return rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode(rdev, vreg->drms_mode[i]);
> 
> Might not hurt to have a comment saying that this calls
> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() instead of calling
> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass() directly because this is supposed
> to change the mode returned by a future call to get_mode().

This seems pretty clear on inspection of the very closely spaced
functions.  I don't see the need for a comment about it.


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>> +                               bool enable)
>> +{
>> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       if (vreg->bypassed == enable)
>> +               return 0;
> 
> Just like for enable, remove this check.  The regulator core does it for you.

Ok


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>> +                               bool *enable)
>> +{
>> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> +
>> +       *enable = vreg->bypassed;
>> +
>> +       return 0;
> 
> Should you return an error code if nobody has ever called set_bypass?
> ...or is it OK to just return "not bypassed"?  Please document this in
> the code.

I think it is fine to return "not bypassed" by default if there is no
configuration in place to enable bypassing.  How are you suggesting that
this be documented in the code?


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
>> +                               struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> +       const char *prop;
>> +       int i, len, ret, mode;
>> +       u32 *buf;
>> +
>> +       /* qcom,allowed-drms-modes is optional */
>> +       prop = "qcom,allowed-drms-modes";
>> +       len = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, prop, sizeof(u32));
>> +       if (len < 0)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>> +       vreg->drms_mode = devm_kcalloc(dev, len, sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode),
>> +                                       GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       vreg->drms_mode_max_uA = devm_kcalloc(dev, len,
>> +                                  sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode_max_uA), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!vreg->drms_mode || !vreg->drms_mode_max_uA)
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>> +       vreg->drms_mode_count = len;
>> +
>> +       buf = kcalloc(len, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!buf)
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +       ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, prop, buf, len);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               dev_err(dev, "%s: unable to read %s, ret=%d\n",
>> +                       node->name, prop, ret);
>> +               goto done;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> +               mode = vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode(buf[i]);
>> +               if (mode <= 0) {
> 
> Should be < 0, not <= 0 right?  Unless we take Javier's suggestion
> (see <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10346081/>) and make 0 be
> invalid...

It looks like the way forward is REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID == 0 so '<= 0' is
fine here.  I suppose that it could be changed to '==
REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID' as well.


>> +               prop = "qcom,regulator-initial-voltage";
>> +               ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
>> +               if (!ret) {
>> +                       range = &vreg->hw_data->voltage_range;
>> +                       selector = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - range->min_uV,
>> +                                       range->uV_step) + range->min_sel;
>> +                       if (uV < range->min_uV || selector > range->max_sel) {
>> +                               dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
>> +                                       node->name, prop, uV);
>> +                               return -EINVAL;
>> +                       }
>> +
>> +                       vreg->voltage_selector = selector;
>> +
>> +                       cmd[cmd_count].addr
>> +                               = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE;
>> +                       cmd[cmd_count++].data
>> +                               = DIV_ROUND_UP(selector * range->uV_step
>> +                                               + range->min_uV, 1000);
>> +               }
> 
> Seems like you want an "else { vreg->voltage_selector = -EINVAL; }".
> Otherwise "get_voltage_sel" will return selector 0 before the first
> set, right?
> 
> Previously Mark said: "If the driver can't read values it should
> return an appropriate error code."
> ...and previously you said: "I'll try this out and see if the
> regulator framework complains during regulator registration."

I tested out what happens when vreg->voltage_selector = -EINVAL is set
when qcom,regulator-initial-voltage is not present.  This results in
devm_regulator_register() failing and subsequently causing the
qcom_rpmh-regulator probe to fail.  The error happens in
machine_constraints_voltage() [1].

This leaves two courses of action:
1. (current patch set) allow voltage_selector to stay 0 if uninitialized
2. Set voltage_selector = -EINVAL by default and specify in DT binding
documentation that qcom,regulator-initial-voltage is required for VRM
managed RPMh regulator resources which have regulator-min-microvolt and
regulator-max-microvolt specified.

Are you ok with the DT implications of option #2?


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_init_vreg(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg, struct device *dev,
>> +                               struct device_node *node, const char *pmic_id,
>> +                               const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *rpmh_data)
>> +{
>> +       struct regulator_config reg_config = {};
>> +       char rpmh_resource_name[20] = "";
>> +       struct regulator_dev *rdev;
>> +       enum rpmh_regulator_type type;
>> +       struct regulator_init_data *init_data;
>> +       unsigned int mode;
>> +       int i, ret;
>> +
>> +       for (; rpmh_data->name; rpmh_data++)
>> +               if (!strcmp(rpmh_data->name, node->name))
>> +                       break;
>> +
>> +       if (!rpmh_data->name) {
>> +               dev_err(dev, "Unknown regulator %s\n", node->name);
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       scnprintf(rpmh_resource_name, sizeof(rpmh_resource_name),
>> +               rpmh_data->resource_name, pmic_id);
> 
> If the resulting string is exactly 20 characters then
> rpmh_resource_name won't be zero terminated.  Please handle this
> properly.

The output of scnprintf() is always null-terminated; therefore, no other
check is needed.  Also, RPMh resource names stored in SMEM command DB data
structure are at most 8 bytes (<= 7 char + '\0' or 8 char and no '\0') so
using 20 chars in the buffer is overkill anyway.


>> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
> 
> I may have suggested using this as an array that could be used as a
> "map" (index by regulator framework mode and get the PMIC mode), but
> now that I see it it doesn't seem super appealing since the regulator
> framework mode is not 0, 1, 2, 3 but is actually 1, 2, 4, 8.  ...but I
> guess it's not too bad--you're allocating 9 ints to map 4 elements and
> I guess that's about as efficient as you're going to get even if it
> feels a bit ugly.

I'm ok with the sparse mapping as it makes indexing as simple as possible
and the extra space used is insignificant.


> ...but still a few improvements:
> 
> * Don't specify the size of the array as "REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1".
> Let the compiler handle this.  It should do the right thing.  Then if
> someone ever changes the order of the #defines things will just work,
> I think.
> 
> * Make sure that users of these arrays check that the mode is one of
> the mode you know about.  That way if someone does add a new mode you
> don't index off your array.  I'll put a comment in the user.

Even if a new mode was added, the relative ordering of the existing modes
should not change and valid_modes_mask will only allow modes currently
supported by the driver.  I'd like to keep the bound checks as simple as
possible.  By explicitly sizing the arrays and then only checking for mode
> REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY when indexing into the array we can be sure that
no out-of-bound access can ever occur.  Also, if one of the existing mode
value was made larger than REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY it would be easy to
catch as it would cause a compilation error.

Thus, I'd prefer to keep the array sizing and index checking as-in unless
there is a major objection.


> Also: the type of this array is 'u32' but you're assigning -EINVAL in
> some cases.  Please fix to be signed.  Here and on other similar
> arrays.

Ok.


>> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
>> +{
>> +       static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = -EINVAL,
>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
>> +       };
> 
> You're sticking a negative value in an array of unsigned inits.  Here
> and in other similar functions.
> 
> I know, I know.  The function is defined to return an unsigned int.
> It's wrong.  of_regulator.c clearly puts the return code in a signed
> int.  First attempt at fixing this is at
> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10346081/>.

I can change the error cases to use REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID which is added
by this change still under review [2].


>> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_bob = {
>> +       .regulator_type = VRM,
>> +       .ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_bypass_ops,
>> +       .voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1824000, 0, 83, 32000),
>> +       .n_voltages = 84,
>> +       .pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_bob,
>> +       .of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode,
>> +       .bypass_mode = 0,
> 
> Remove .bypass_mode from the structure and just change
> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass() to set 0 if we're in bypass.
> Right now 100% of PMICs that support bypass use 0 as the bypass mode.
> If you ever have a future PMIC that uses a non-zero mode for bypass
> then we can always add this back.  ...and if no future PMICs ever use
> a non-zero bypass mode then we don't need the complexity of having
> another field in this struct.
> 
> If you don't do this you might get arguments from some people saying
> that they don't like seeing inits of "= 0" in static structures (Linux
> conventions seem to like you to just assume that structs are
> zero-initted).

Upcoming PMICs use 2 for bypass mode instead of 0.  That is why I left
this in.  I suppose that I can remove this member for now and add it back
in when newer PMIC support is added.


>> +static int rpmh_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +       const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *vreg_data;
>> +       struct rpmh_client *rpmh_client;
>> +       struct device_node *node;
>> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg;
>> +       const char *pmic_id;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       ret = cmd_db_ready();
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +                       dev_err(dev, "Command DB not available, ret=%d\n", ret);
>> +               return ret;
>> +       }
> 
> In the last patch Stephen said:
> 
>> We should just make rpmh parent device call cmd_db_ready() so that these
>> devices aren't even populated until then and so that cmd_db_ready() is
>> only in one place. Lina?
> 
> Any news here?

I don't think that Lina has tried to include this in her rpmh series yet.


>> +cleanup:
>> +       rpmh_release(rpmh_client);
> 
> Still no devm_rpmh_get_client()?  If Lina is too busy spinning her
> patch series for other stuff, just add it to RPMH as a patch in your
> series.  I believe it's just this (untested):
> 
> ---
> 
> int devm_rpmh_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
> {
>   struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>   rpmh_release(pdev);
> }
> 
> int devm_rpmh_get_client(struct device *dev)
> {
>   struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>   void *dr;
>   int rc;
> 
>   dr = devres_alloc(devm_rpmh_release, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>   if (!dr)
>     return -ENOMEM;
> 
>   rc = rpmh_get_client(pdev);
>   if (!rc)
>     devres_add(dev, dr);
>   else
>     devres_free(dr);
> 
>   return rc;
> }
> 
> ---
> 
> Note that you'll get rid of the error handling in probe, the whole
> remove function, and the need to do platform_set_drvdata().

My understanding is that Lina is going to remove both rpmh_get_client()
and rpmh_release().  In their place, rpmh functions will use the consumer
device pointer as a handle and manage any necessary state internally [3].
I'll update this patch once she uploads a new series with this interface
modification.

Thanks,
David

[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/regulator/core.c?h=v4.17-rc1#n888
[2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10348631/
[3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/10/1273

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting David Collins (2018-04-18 16:30:26)
> On 04/17/2018 01:02 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_DISABLE                 0x0
> >> +#define RPMH_REGULATOR_ENABLE                  0x1
> > 
> > In the last version Stephen said he didn't like the above two #defines
> > and you said you'd remove them, yet they are still here.  Explanation?
> 
> I thought that he was referring to the comments above the constants since
> his review comment was immediately following the second of two comments as
> opposed to these constants.  I'll let him follow-up on this point if
> necessary.
> 

I think I was talking about the comments. The defines don't look super
useful either though.

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:30 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> + * @drms_mode:                 Array of regulator framework modes which can
>>> + *                             be configured dynamically for this regulator
>>> + *                             via the set_load() callback.
>>
>> Using the singular for something that is an array is confusing.  Why
>> not "drms_modes" or "drms_mode_arr"?  In the past review you said
>> 'Perhaps something along the lines of "drms_modes"'.
>
> It seems awkward to me to use a plural for arrays as it leads to indexing
> like this: vreg->drms_modes[i].  "mode i" seems better than "modes i".
> However, I'm willing to change this to be drms_modes and drms_mode_max_uAs
> if that style is preferred.

I'd very much like a plural here.


>>> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
>>> +                                       unsigned int mode, bool bypassed)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct tcs_cmd cmd = {
>>> +               .addr = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_MODE,
>>> +       };
>>
>> Please add:
>>
>> if (mode & ~(REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY |
>>      REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE |
>>      REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL |
>>      REGULATOR_MODE_FAST))
>>   return -EINVAL;
>>
>> That way if someone adds a new mode you don't index off the end of
>> your array.  Ah, I see, you have this in rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode
>> by checking if mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY.  That works.  Can you
>> move it here so it's closer to where the array access is?
>
> Theoretically, the (mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY) check in
> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() shouldn't be necessary at all.  I felt safer
> leaving it in though.  The framework ensures that no mode values may be
> passed into rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() which is not identified in
> constraints.valid_modes_mask.  Similar sanitization happens for internal
> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() calls.
>
> I'll move the (mode > REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY) check into
> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass().

Ah, good point about the valid_modes_mask!  I'm happy with moving the
test here.  I wouldn't mind a comment saying that the check is
probably overkill because the framework already checks
valid_modes_mask but shouldn't hurt.


>>> +
>>> +       return rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode(rdev, vreg->drms_mode[i]);
>>
>> Might not hurt to have a comment saying that this calls
>> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode() instead of calling
>> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass() directly because this is supposed
>> to change the mode returned by a future call to get_mode().
>
> This seems pretty clear on inspection of the very closely spaced
> functions.  I don't see the need for a comment about it.

It wasn't clear to me--I thought it might have just been because you
didn't want to manually pass in the current bypass state.  Then I
looked at the function and thought there might have been a bug because
it was saving the mode.  Then I looked back at the regulator framework
and finally came to the conclusion that set_load() is supposed to
change the mode (AKA: you'd expect that calling get_mode() after
set_load() would show you the mode you ended up at).

I guess this is all perhaps obvious to any regulator framework
experts, but since I spent 5 minutes digging through all that it
seemed like it deserved a comment to save the next person the 5
minutes.  ...but I won't insist.


>>> +static int rpmh_regulator_vrm_get_bypass(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>>> +                               bool *enable)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct rpmh_vreg *vreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> +
>>> +       *enable = vreg->bypassed;
>>> +
>>> +       return 0;
>>
>> Should you return an error code if nobody has ever called set_bypass?
>> ...or is it OK to just return "not bypassed"?  Please document this in
>> the code.
>
> I think it is fine to return "not bypassed" by default if there is no
> configuration in place to enable bypassing.  How are you suggesting that
> this be documented in the code?

I guess I wish the function had comments and then it could be
documented there.  ...but none of the functions in this file do...

I guess you're right that it's clear enough without a comment, so
let's just leave it as is.


>>> +static int rpmh_regulator_parse_vrm_modes(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg,
>>> +                               struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
>>> +{
>>> +       const char *prop;
>>> +       int i, len, ret, mode;
>>> +       u32 *buf;
>>> +
>>> +       /* qcom,allowed-drms-modes is optional */
>>> +       prop = "qcom,allowed-drms-modes";
>>> +       len = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, prop, sizeof(u32));
>>> +       if (len < 0)
>>> +               return 0;
>>> +
>>> +       vreg->drms_mode = devm_kcalloc(dev, len, sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode),
>>> +                                       GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +       vreg->drms_mode_max_uA = devm_kcalloc(dev, len,
>>> +                                  sizeof(*vreg->drms_mode_max_uA), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +       if (!vreg->drms_mode || !vreg->drms_mode_max_uA)
>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>> +       vreg->drms_mode_count = len;
>>> +
>>> +       buf = kcalloc(len, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +       if (!buf)
>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +       ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, prop, buf, len);
>>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>>> +               dev_err(dev, "%s: unable to read %s, ret=%d\n",
>>> +                       node->name, prop, ret);
>>> +               goto done;
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>> +       for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>>> +               mode = vreg->hw_data->of_map_mode(buf[i]);
>>> +               if (mode <= 0) {
>>
>> Should be < 0, not <= 0 right?  Unless we take Javier's suggestion
>> (see <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10346081/>) and make 0 be
>> invalid...
>
> It looks like the way forward is REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID == 0 so '<= 0' is
> fine here.  I suppose that it could be changed to '==
> REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID' as well.

Yes, assuming my patch lands using "==" is better.  Checking whether
an unsigned value is <= 0 is confusing.


>>> +               prop = "qcom,regulator-initial-voltage";
>>> +               ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
>>> +               if (!ret) {
>>> +                       range = &vreg->hw_data->voltage_range;
>>> +                       selector = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - range->min_uV,
>>> +                                       range->uV_step) + range->min_sel;
>>> +                       if (uV < range->min_uV || selector > range->max_sel) {
>>> +                               dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
>>> +                                       node->name, prop, uV);
>>> +                               return -EINVAL;
>>> +                       }
>>> +
>>> +                       vreg->voltage_selector = selector;
>>> +
>>> +                       cmd[cmd_count].addr
>>> +                               = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE;
>>> +                       cmd[cmd_count++].data
>>> +                               = DIV_ROUND_UP(selector * range->uV_step
>>> +                                               + range->min_uV, 1000);
>>> +               }
>>
>> Seems like you want an "else { vreg->voltage_selector = -EINVAL; }".
>> Otherwise "get_voltage_sel" will return selector 0 before the first
>> set, right?
>>
>> Previously Mark said: "If the driver can't read values it should
>> return an appropriate error code."
>> ...and previously you said: "I'll try this out and see if the
>> regulator framework complains during regulator registration."
>
> I tested out what happens when vreg->voltage_selector = -EINVAL is set
> when qcom,regulator-initial-voltage is not present.  This results in
> devm_regulator_register() failing and subsequently causing the
> qcom_rpmh-regulator probe to fail.  The error happens in
> machine_constraints_voltage() [1].
>
> This leaves two courses of action:
> 1. (current patch set) allow voltage_selector to stay 0 if uninitialized
> 2. Set voltage_selector = -EINVAL by default and specify in DT binding
> documentation that qcom,regulator-initial-voltage is required for VRM
> managed RPMh regulator resources which have regulator-min-microvolt and
> regulator-max-microvolt specified.
>
> Are you ok with the DT implications of option #2?

You'd need to ask Mark if he's OK with it, but a option #3 is to add a
patch to your series fix the regulator framework to try setting the
voltage if _regulator_get_voltage() fails.  Presumably in
machine_constraints_voltage() you'd now do something like:

  int target_min, target_max;
  int current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
  if (current_uV < 0) {
    /* Maybe this regulator's hardware can't be read and needs to be initted */
    _regulator_do_set_voltage(
      rdev, rdev->constraints->min_uV, rdev->constraints->min_uV);
    current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
  }
  if (current_uV < 0) {
    rdev_err(rdev,
      "failed to get the current voltage(%d)\n",
      current_uV);
      return current_uV;
  }

If Mark doesn't like that then I guess I'd be OK w/ initting it to 0
but this needs to be documented _somewhere_ (unlike for bypass it's
not obvious, so you need to find someplace to put it).  I'd rather not
hack the DT to deal with our software limitations.


>>> +static int rpmh_regulator_init_vreg(struct rpmh_vreg *vreg, struct device *dev,
>>> +                               struct device_node *node, const char *pmic_id,
>>> +                               const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data *rpmh_data)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct regulator_config reg_config = {};
>>> +       char rpmh_resource_name[20] = "";
>>> +       struct regulator_dev *rdev;
>>> +       enum rpmh_regulator_type type;
>>> +       struct regulator_init_data *init_data;
>>> +       unsigned int mode;
>>> +       int i, ret;
>>> +
>>> +       for (; rpmh_data->name; rpmh_data++)
>>> +               if (!strcmp(rpmh_data->name, node->name))
>>> +                       break;
>>> +
>>> +       if (!rpmh_data->name) {
>>> +               dev_err(dev, "Unknown regulator %s\n", node->name);
>>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>> +       scnprintf(rpmh_resource_name, sizeof(rpmh_resource_name),
>>> +               rpmh_data->resource_name, pmic_id);
>>
>> If the resulting string is exactly 20 characters then
>> rpmh_resource_name won't be zero terminated.  Please handle this
>> properly.
>
> The output of scnprintf() is always null-terminated; therefore, no other
> check is needed.  Also, RPMh resource names stored in SMEM command DB data
> structure are at most 8 bytes (<= 7 char + '\0' or 8 char and no '\0') so
> using 20 chars in the buffer is overkill anyway.

Wow, not sure where I looked to see that scnprintf() didn't always
null-terminate.  Sorry.  Ignore this.


>>> +static const u32 pmic_mode_map_pmic4_ldo[REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1] = {
>>
>> I may have suggested using this as an array that could be used as a
>> "map" (index by regulator framework mode and get the PMIC mode), but
>> now that I see it it doesn't seem super appealing since the regulator
>> framework mode is not 0, 1, 2, 3 but is actually 1, 2, 4, 8.  ...but I
>> guess it's not too bad--you're allocating 9 ints to map 4 elements and
>> I guess that's about as efficient as you're going to get even if it
>> feels a bit ugly.
>
> I'm ok with the sparse mapping as it makes indexing as simple as possible
> and the extra space used is insignificant.
>
>
>> ...but still a few improvements:
>>
>> * Don't specify the size of the array as "REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY + 1".
>> Let the compiler handle this.  It should do the right thing.  Then if
>> someone ever changes the order of the #defines things will just work,
>> I think.
>>
>> * Make sure that users of these arrays check that the mode is one of
>> the mode you know about.  That way if someone does add a new mode you
>> don't index off your array.  I'll put a comment in the user.
>
> Even if a new mode was added, the relative ordering of the existing modes
> should not change and valid_modes_mask will only allow modes currently
> supported by the driver.  I'd like to keep the bound checks as simple as
> possible.  By explicitly sizing the arrays and then only checking for mode
>> REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY when indexing into the array we can be sure that
> no out-of-bound access can ever occur.  Also, if one of the existing mode
> value was made larger than REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY it would be easy to
> catch as it would cause a compilation error.
>
> Thus, I'd prefer to keep the array sizing and index checking as-in unless
> there is a major objection.

OK.


>>> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
>>> +{
>>> +       static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
>>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = -EINVAL,
>>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
>>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
>>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
>>> +       };
>>
>> You're sticking a negative value in an array of unsigned inits.  Here
>> and in other similar functions.
>>
>> I know, I know.  The function is defined to return an unsigned int.
>> It's wrong.  of_regulator.c clearly puts the return code in a signed
>> int.  First attempt at fixing this is at
>> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10346081/>.
>
> I can change the error cases to use REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID which is added
> by this change still under review [2].

I haven't seen Mark NAK it (yet), so for lack of a better option I'd
start using it in your patch and document in the commit message that
it depends on my patch.


>>> +static const struct rpmh_vreg_hw_data pmic4_bob = {
>>> +       .regulator_type = VRM,
>>> +       .ops = &rpmh_regulator_vrm_bypass_ops,
>>> +       .voltage_range = REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1824000, 0, 83, 32000),
>>> +       .n_voltages = 84,
>>> +       .pmic_mode_map = pmic_mode_map_pmic4_bob,
>>> +       .of_map_mode = rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode,
>>> +       .bypass_mode = 0,
>>
>> Remove .bypass_mode from the structure and just change
>> rpmh_regulator_vrm_set_mode_bypass() to set 0 if we're in bypass.
>> Right now 100% of PMICs that support bypass use 0 as the bypass mode.
>> If you ever have a future PMIC that uses a non-zero mode for bypass
>> then we can always add this back.  ...and if no future PMICs ever use
>> a non-zero bypass mode then we don't need the complexity of having
>> another field in this struct.
>>
>> If you don't do this you might get arguments from some people saying
>> that they don't like seeing inits of "= 0" in static structures (Linux
>> conventions seem to like you to just assume that structs are
>> zero-initted).
>
> Upcoming PMICs use 2 for bypass mode instead of 0.  That is why I left
> this in.  I suppose that I can remove this member for now and add it back
> in when newer PMIC support is added.

I'm OK with keeping it as long as there is a real user coming up.
IMHO with the #defines as suggested by Matthias this will look better
anyway (it will be more obvious that this isn't a boolean, for
instance).


>>> +cleanup:
>>> +       rpmh_release(rpmh_client);
>>
>> Still no devm_rpmh_get_client()?  If Lina is too busy spinning her
>> patch series for other stuff, just add it to RPMH as a patch in your
>> series.  I believe it's just this (untested):
>>
>> ---
>>
>> int devm_rpmh_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
>> {
>>   struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>>   rpmh_release(pdev);
>> }
>>
>> int devm_rpmh_get_client(struct device *dev)
>> {
>>   struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>>   void *dr;
>>   int rc;
>>
>>   dr = devres_alloc(devm_rpmh_release, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>>   if (!dr)
>>     return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>   rc = rpmh_get_client(pdev);
>>   if (!rc)
>>     devres_add(dev, dr);
>>   else
>>     devres_free(dr);
>>
>>   return rc;
>> }
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Note that you'll get rid of the error handling in probe, the whole
>> remove function, and the need to do platform_set_drvdata().
>
> My understanding is that Lina is going to remove both rpmh_get_client()
> and rpmh_release().  In their place, rpmh functions will use the consumer
> device pointer as a handle and manage any necessary state internally [3].
> I'll update this patch once she uploads a new series with this interface
> modification.

OK, sounds good.  Information like this is nice to include somewhere
in the cover letter or the patch description so it's more obvious that
you wouldn't want this patch to land until that's sorted out.


-Doug

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

On 04/19/2018 09:16 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:30 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> + * @drms_mode:                 Array of regulator framework modes which can
>>>> + *                             be configured dynamically for this regulator
>>>> + *                             via the set_load() callback.
>>>
>>> Using the singular for something that is an array is confusing.  Why
>>> not "drms_modes" or "drms_mode_arr"?  In the past review you said
>>> 'Perhaps something along the lines of "drms_modes"'.
>>
>> It seems awkward to me to use a plural for arrays as it leads to indexing
>> like this: vreg->drms_modes[i].  "mode i" seems better than "modes i".
>> However, I'm willing to change this to be drms_modes and drms_mode_max_uAs
>> if that style is preferred.
> 
> I'd very much like a plural here.

Ok.  I'll change this to be plural.


>>>> +               prop = "qcom,regulator-initial-voltage";
>>>> +               ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &uV);
>>>> +               if (!ret) {
>>>> +                       range = &vreg->hw_data->voltage_range;
>>>> +                       selector = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - range->min_uV,
>>>> +                                       range->uV_step) + range->min_sel;
>>>> +                       if (uV < range->min_uV || selector > range->max_sel) {
>>>> +                               dev_err(dev, "%s: %s=%u is invalid\n",
>>>> +                                       node->name, prop, uV);
>>>> +                               return -EINVAL;
>>>> +                       }
>>>> +
>>>> +                       vreg->voltage_selector = selector;
>>>> +
>>>> +                       cmd[cmd_count].addr
>>>> +                               = vreg->addr + RPMH_REGULATOR_REG_VRM_VOLTAGE;
>>>> +                       cmd[cmd_count++].data
>>>> +                               = DIV_ROUND_UP(selector * range->uV_step
>>>> +                                               + range->min_uV, 1000);
>>>> +               }
>>>
>>> Seems like you want an "else { vreg->voltage_selector = -EINVAL; }".
>>> Otherwise "get_voltage_sel" will return selector 0 before the first
>>> set, right?
>>>
>>> Previously Mark said: "If the driver can't read values it should
>>> return an appropriate error code."
>>> ...and previously you said: "I'll try this out and see if the
>>> regulator framework complains during regulator registration."
>>
>> I tested out what happens when vreg->voltage_selector = -EINVAL is set
>> when qcom,regulator-initial-voltage is not present.  This results in
>> devm_regulator_register() failing and subsequently causing the
>> qcom_rpmh-regulator probe to fail.  The error happens in
>> machine_constraints_voltage() [1].
>>
>> This leaves two courses of action:
>> 1. (current patch set) allow voltage_selector to stay 0 if uninitialized
>> 2. Set voltage_selector = -EINVAL by default and specify in DT binding
>> documentation that qcom,regulator-initial-voltage is required for VRM
>> managed RPMh regulator resources which have regulator-min-microvolt and
>> regulator-max-microvolt specified.
>>
>> Are you ok with the DT implications of option #2?
> 
> You'd need to ask Mark if he's OK with it, but a option #3 is to add a
> patch to your series fix the regulator framework to try setting the
> voltage if _regulator_get_voltage() fails.  Presumably in
> machine_constraints_voltage() you'd now do something like:
> 
>   int target_min, target_max;
>   int current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
>   if (current_uV < 0) {
>     /* Maybe this regulator's hardware can't be read and needs to be initted */
>     _regulator_do_set_voltage(
>       rdev, rdev->constraints->min_uV, rdev->constraints->min_uV);
>     current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
>   }
>   if (current_uV < 0) {
>     rdev_err(rdev,
>       "failed to get the current voltage(%d)\n",
>       current_uV);
>       return current_uV;
>   }
> 
> If Mark doesn't like that then I guess I'd be OK w/ initting it to 0
> but this needs to be documented _somewhere_ (unlike for bypass it's
> not obvious, so you need to find someplace to put it).  I'd rather not
> hack the DT to deal with our software limitations.

I'm not opposed to your option #3 though it does seem a little hacky and
tailored to the qcom_rpmh-regulator specific case.  Note that I think it
would be better to vote for min_uV to max_uV than min_uV to min_uV though.

Mark, what are your thoughts on the best way to handle this situation?


>>>> +static unsigned int rpmh_regulator_pmic4_bob_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       static const unsigned int of_mode_map[RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_COUNT] = {
>>>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_RET]  = -EINVAL,
>>>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_LPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE,
>>>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO] = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,
>>>> +               [RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM]  = REGULATOR_MODE_FAST,
>>>> +       };
>>>
>>> You're sticking a negative value in an array of unsigned inits.  Here
>>> and in other similar functions.
>>>
>>> I know, I know.  The function is defined to return an unsigned int.
>>> It's wrong.  of_regulator.c clearly puts the return code in a signed
>>> int.  First attempt at fixing this is at
>>> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10346081/>.
>>
>> I can change the error cases to use REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID which is added
>> by this change still under review [2].
> 
> I haven't seen Mark NAK it (yet), so for lack of a better option I'd
> start using it in your patch and document in the commit message that
> it depends on my patch.

Your patch was accepted.  I'll switch to using REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID.

Thanks,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2079 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 03:08:57PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> On 04/19/2018 09:16 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:30 PM, David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> wrote:

Please delete unneeded context from mails when replying.  Doing this
makes it much easier to find your reply in the message, helping ensure
it won't be missed by people scrolling through the irrelevant quoted
material.

> > You'd need to ask Mark if he's OK with it, but a option #3 is to add a
> > patch to your series fix the regulator framework to try setting the
> > voltage if _regulator_get_voltage() fails.  Presumably in
> > machine_constraints_voltage() you'd now do something like:
> > 
> >   int target_min, target_max;
> >   int current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
> >   if (current_uV < 0) {
> >     /* Maybe this regulator's hardware can't be read and needs to be initted */
> >     _regulator_do_set_voltage(
> >       rdev, rdev->constraints->min_uV, rdev->constraints->min_uV);
> >     current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
> >   }
> >   if (current_uV < 0) {
> >     rdev_err(rdev,
> >       "failed to get the current voltage(%d)\n",
> >       current_uV);
> >       return current_uV;
> >   }

> > If Mark doesn't like that then I guess I'd be OK w/ initting it to 0
> > but this needs to be documented _somewhere_ (unlike for bypass it's
> > not obvious, so you need to find someplace to put it).  I'd rather not
> > hack the DT to deal with our software limitations.

> I'm not opposed to your option #3 though it does seem a little hacky and
> tailored to the qcom_rpmh-regulator specific case.  Note that I think it
> would be better to vote for min_uV to max_uV than min_uV to min_uV though.

> Mark, what are your thoughts on the best way to handle this situation?

I think that's probably only OK if we have a specific error code for the
regulator being limited in this way otherwise our error handling for I/O
problems involves us trying to reconfigure supplies which seems like it
would be risky.  

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

On 04/24/2018 10:45 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> You'd need to ask Mark if he's OK with it, but a option #3 is to add a
>>> patch to your series fix the regulator framework to try setting the
>>> voltage if _regulator_get_voltage() fails.  Presumably in
>>> machine_constraints_voltage() you'd now do something like:
>>>
>>>   int target_min, target_max;
>>>   int current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
>>>   if (current_uV < 0) {
>>>     /* Maybe this regulator's hardware can't be read and needs to be initted */
>>>     _regulator_do_set_voltage(
>>>       rdev, rdev->constraints->min_uV, rdev->constraints->min_uV);
>>>     current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
>>>   }
>>>   if (current_uV < 0) {
>>>     rdev_err(rdev,
>>>       "failed to get the current voltage(%d)\n",
>>>       current_uV);
>>>       return current_uV;
>>>   }
> 
>>> If Mark doesn't like that then I guess I'd be OK w/ initting it to 0
>>> but this needs to be documented _somewhere_ (unlike for bypass it's
>>> not obvious, so you need to find someplace to put it).  I'd rather not
>>> hack the DT to deal with our software limitations.
> 
>> I'm not opposed to your option #3 though it does seem a little hacky and
>> tailored to the qcom_rpmh-regulator specific case.  Note that I think it
>> would be better to vote for min_uV to max_uV than min_uV to min_uV though.
> 
>> Mark, what are your thoughts on the best way to handle this situation?
> 
> I think that's probably only OK if we have a specific error code for the
> regulator being limited in this way otherwise our error handling for I/O
> problems involves us trying to reconfigure supplies which seems like it
> would be risky.  

Would you be ok with -EAGAIN being used for this purpose?

Thanks,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 609 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 02:09:47PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> On 04/24/2018 10:45 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I think that's probably only OK if we have a specific error code for the
> > regulator being limited in this way otherwise our error handling for I/O
> > problems involves us trying to reconfigure supplies which seems like it
> > would be risky.  

> Would you be ok with -EAGAIN being used for this purpose?

Using -EAGAIN for "I can't ever read the configuration from this
regulator" doesn't seem right - it's not like any number of retries
will ever manage to read the value back.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

>>> I think that's probably only OK if we have a specific error code for the
>>> regulator being limited in this way otherwise our error handling for I/O
>>> problems involves us trying to reconfigure supplies which seems like it
>>> would be risky.  

>> Would you be ok with -EAGAIN being used for this purpose?

> Using -EAGAIN for "I can't ever read the configuration from this
> regulator" doesn't seem right - it's not like any number of retries
> will ever manage to read the value back.

In this case, the _regulator_get_voltage() call can succeed, but only
after a voltage is explicitly requested from the framework side.  The
intention here would then be to call _regulator_do_set_voltage() with the
constraint min_uV to max_uV range.  After that, subsequent
_regulator_get_voltage() calls will be successful.

Here is the general idea:

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 65f9b7c..e61983d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -910,6 +910,19 @@ static int machine_constraints_voltage(struct
regulator_dev *rdev,
 	    rdev->constraints->min_uV && rdev->constraints->max_uV) {
 		int target_min, target_max;
 		int current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
+		if (current_uV == -EAGAIN) {
+			/*
+			 * Regulator voltage cannot be read until after
+			 * configuration; try setting constraint range.
+			 */
+			rdev_info(rdev, "Setting %d-%duV\n",
+				  rdev->constraints->min_uV,
+				  rdev->constraints->max_uV);
+			_regulator_do_set_voltage(rdev,
+						  rdev->constraints->min_uV,
+						  rdev->constraints->max_uV);
+			current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
+		}
 		if (current_uV < 0) {
 			rdev_err(rdev,
 				 "failed to get the current voltage(%d)\n",

Do you still have reservations about using -EAGAIN for this purpose?  If
so, which error code would you suggest using?

Thanks,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 786 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:04:56PM -0700, David Collins wrote:

> > Using -EAGAIN for "I can't ever read the configuration from this
> > regulator" doesn't seem right - it's not like any number of retries
> > will ever manage to read the value back.

> In this case, the _regulator_get_voltage() call can succeed, but only
> after a voltage is explicitly requested from the framework side.  The

...

> Do you still have reservations about using -EAGAIN for this purpose?  If
> so, which error code would you suggest using?

Yes, that's clearly a problem - -EAGAIN is more for situations where you
can just immediately retry like signal interruptions.  If the caller
repetedly sits and tries to read the voltage it'll never succeed unless
something else comes along and sets something.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]