devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Konrad Dybcio <quic_kdybcio@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Affirm SMMU coherent pagetable walker capability on RPMh SoCs
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:07:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fb16b35-e6c5-4239-a745-a9dd7412539a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D4A2FKPTXHS5.3AHU7ZEKFVMGG@fairphone.com>

On 19.09.2024 9:00 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Thu Sep 19, 2024 at 12:57 AM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> I only read back the SMMU config on X1E & 7280, but I have it on good
>> authority that this concerns all RPMh SoCs. Sending as RFC just in case.
>>
>> Lacking coherency can hurt performance, but claiming coherency where it's
>> absent would lead to a kaboom.
> 
> Hi Konrad!
> 
> You want people with the affected SoCs to test this I imagine?

Yeah, would be nice to confirm

> 
> Just boot it and see if it doesn't implode, or do you have any more
> elaborate test plan for this?

No, booting should be enough of a test

Konrad

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-19 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-18 22:57 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Affirm SMMU coherent pagetable walker capability on RPMh SoCs Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Affirm IDR0.CCTW on apps_smmu Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-20 13:44   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-24  7:15   ` Luca Weiss
2024-09-24  7:37     ` Luca Weiss
2024-09-24 10:04       ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-18 22:57 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: " Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-19  7:00 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Affirm SMMU coherent pagetable walker capability on RPMh SoCs Luca Weiss
2024-09-19 10:07   ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2024-09-19 18:48     ` Steev Klimaszewski
2024-09-20  7:35 ` neil.armstrong
2024-10-07 14:25 ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2fb16b35-e6c5-4239-a745-a9dd7412539a@kernel.org \
    --to=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=quic_kdybcio@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).