From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702E5168BD; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726740455; cv=none; b=tYLghYyn7RJLWN2IfowdQaUPbEDszUvuImQeHDXODXQbtftT0yKhFB1KQLnPIglq2s2H8IUSbkD7Xa92NfZA6L3YFE+Uwvsm3kATJS7XfBb3dWD5i36HxjHTi0AZ7IzDJSN14FaQIerfkveo8mDbCYAeLKIWmqp/g2+Gkk7PBmU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726740455; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tBBR7+8ZF6X4adQNOfOlakRM+GK+OiRN3rw2J04b8gA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=AsnuzMeV8PNDDMgITIA4VTSzJwx9z7yRN19jiTlGI9ZdOlu7QWKaWQDe0/q1pLPyoNvOr9wYCcG075wqtwD8Q7gkCiczoWBvDKrU39J2KanL8aykqoqPaooMQeVGt+d0Tig5N1g15htlvuGuNWIspcfz7gnhNJbUzTnVEQXI/7Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=F5hBkpfm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="F5hBkpfm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40830C4CEC5; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:07:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1726740455; bh=tBBR7+8ZF6X4adQNOfOlakRM+GK+OiRN3rw2J04b8gA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=F5hBkpfmKRrSDFCRO6Jgr9IB7kbStucmIHlrz1W4BQ36EouETMuhv+WvdST/c0JTD OOqP3eLjOR617dglTjEe81tVunJZtK3VJ2tgj29lAXhtZt37sh8Zns/WHDGGDvB8nN EBeu7ncJ7A6FY6CZoAeb0EKrq480ZIkPE0sSoM1/oFhRHDS96MMcSSoGi2vlZZ1dRP cUWGboKxdsN6FjcD/2jNWJQDiu2rAo/RzcLKp5+sV4NGOMyNIRONg5voCebnXDm9bO 6MXcrWlsOwoy3MLxTrOHeL32Fj6WZ1KQ5DkHTpoOJboOg0Ck7G2dR497eUj84kxn4z eZgLMK+tJHTFA== Message-ID: <2fb16b35-e6c5-4239-a745-a9dd7412539a@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:07:29 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Affirm SMMU coherent pagetable walker capability on RPMh SoCs To: Luca Weiss , Konrad Dybcio , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org Cc: Marijn Suijten , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio References: <20240919-topic-apps_smmu_coherent-v1-0-5b3a8662403d@quicinc.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Konrad Dybcio In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 19.09.2024 9:00 AM, Luca Weiss wrote: > On Thu Sep 19, 2024 at 12:57 AM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> I only read back the SMMU config on X1E & 7280, but I have it on good >> authority that this concerns all RPMh SoCs. Sending as RFC just in case. >> >> Lacking coherency can hurt performance, but claiming coherency where it's >> absent would lead to a kaboom. > > Hi Konrad! > > You want people with the affected SoCs to test this I imagine? Yeah, would be nice to confirm > > Just boot it and see if it doesn't implode, or do you have any more > elaborate test plan for this? No, booting should be enough of a test Konrad