From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DC6CA9EAF for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF02020856 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="Wop/lkRM"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="FHXYYpjV" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392814AbfJXLAY (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:00:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:58618 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730032AbfJXLAX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:00:23 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10F6860F6F; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:00:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1571914823; bh=lF7VPfa990k56WtZ+Go5dWYnjSW2LrwS9wWkHXP4Fz4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Wop/lkRMFXZ5nrTbnlNqKiRR3pM0eIGsKjl5sJfXD6aZfyFUfEkN55fivz7UfYWnD amJ3WW6UZ2zOAYIBDe/GvQ0K2jrmeenXgqBpsx1Ac4dBQaOPqrc3fA82yEciWrNnMY tjNW4MPlE9ScAoKIR4yFYKRZw5OMfTEgbKjQfkWw= Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C7460F6F; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:00:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1571914821; bh=lF7VPfa990k56WtZ+Go5dWYnjSW2LrwS9wWkHXP4Fz4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FHXYYpjVhnwjTXVDWJwmM/6h7UrDLlDN593yCL1ElgRD4TwG+aFUs4i5wweheVcsf 8vBYWsbmkZs1K9/ang24XNX2vvMfb2OjC9w3kMAFMsxzhFupf+u48MyYjxyTqNexSk 5Gyt3BB89Rqn1j+7hYCDaWpefVTsSF02L0TlJWRE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:30:21 +0530 From: Sai Prakash Ranjan To: Rob Herring Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross , Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-msm , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak , Rishabh Bhatnagar , Doug Anderson , linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Add LLCC support for SC7180 SoC In-Reply-To: References: <20191021033220.GG4500@tuxbook-pro> Message-ID: <2fbab8bc38be37fba976d34b2f89e720@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Rob, On 2019-10-24 01:19, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:32 PM Bjorn Andersson > wrote: >> >> On Sat 19 Oct 04:37 PDT 2019, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: >> >> > LLCC behaviour is controlled by the configuration data set >> > in the llcc-qcom driver, add the same for SC7180 SoC. >> > Also convert the existing bindings to json-schema and add >> > the compatible for SC7180 SoC. >> > >> >> Thanks for the patches and thanks for the review Stephen. Series >> applied > > And they break dt_binding_check. Please fix. > I did check this and think that the error log from dt_binding_check is not valid because it says cache-level is a required property [1], but there is no such property in LLCC bindings. [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1179800/ -Sai -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation