From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add platform support for LSI AXM55xx Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 14:39:55 +0200 Message-ID: <30207873.oHzEC0kjdd@wuerfel> References: <6334605.NlytHCzYVP@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Anders Berg , Mike Turquette , devicetree , Russell King , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:37:26 Anders Berg wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 May 2014 20:37:55 Anders Berg wrote: > >> > >> This is version 3 of this series to introduces basic platform support for the LSI > >> AXM5516 SoC. > >> > >> No major changes since v2. Ready to be applied to the arm-soc tree? > > > > I think it's good, but I'm not sure if we should put them all into arm-soc. > > There are no dependencies between the drivers that I can see, so why not > > merge the clock and reset drivers through the individual subsystem maintainers? > > > > After suggestions from Mike on the clk driver (and it's dts binding) > I've done an updated clock driver patch - and a dependency surfaced... > The file . Which way should this > take, arm-soc or Mikes clk tree? Perhaps this is a reason to take it > all through arm-soc? I don't see the dependency: The clock driver is built only when CONFIG_ARCH_AXXIA is set, and that only gets introduced in the platform patches. As long as the header files come with the platform, it should be fine. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html