From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sricharan R Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] cpufreq: dt: Reintroduce independent_clocks platform data Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:54:23 +0530 Message-ID: <30a8a0b5-bd46-9e6f-e534-205a7c00ebe2@codeaurora.org> References: <1512726150-7204-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <1512726150-7204-13-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <20171211083328.GE25177@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171211083328.GE25177@vireshk-i7> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Viresh, On 12/11/2017 2:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 08-12-17, 15:12, Sricharan R wrote: >> The Platform data was removed earlier by, >> 'commit eb96924acddc ("cpufreq: dt: Kill platform-data")' >> since there were no users at that time. >> Now this is required when the each of the cpu clocks >> can be scaled independently, which is the case >> for krait cores. So reintroduce it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 7 ++++++- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.h | 6 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Nack. This information should come from the OPP layer (Hint: > dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus()). > Thanks. Understand. As replied on the other patch, after using dev_pm_opp_set_prop_name and opp-v2 bindings, this patch is no more required. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus