From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Vivek Unune" <npcomplete13@gmail.com>
Cc: BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proper DT bindings for Broadcom's DMU node
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:24:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30fe8a8d-34a7-2138-a823-f508a8250039@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef6e208d-e74f-382b-953f-1f770ab12754@gmail.com>
On 8/20/20 5:38 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Hi Rob, could you help me/us with Northstar bindings design, please?
>
> On 04.05.2020 17:24, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> I need some help with designing proper bindings for Broadcom's DMU
>> block. We already have it partially covered but it's inconsistent, some
>> cleanups were rejected and so I want to redesign it as it should be.
>>
>> DMU ("Device Management Unit") is a block that can be found on Broadcom
>> iProc / Northstar devices. On Northstar it's mapped at:
>> ranges = <0x1800c000 0x1000>
>>
>> It contains:
>> 1. Few random registers, some of them shared by various hardware
>> blocks (and possibly hard to abstract?)
>> 2. At least one sub-block with even more random registers
>>
>> Some of known DMU registers are:
>> reg = <0x100 0x14> CRU LCPLL control0
>> reg = <0x140 0x24> CRU GENPLL
>> reg = <0x164 0x04> CRU_USB2_CONTROL
>> reg = <0x180 0x04> CRU_CLKSET_KEY
>> reg = <0x184 0x04> CRU_RESET
>> reg = <0x1c0 0x24> pinctrl
>> reg = <0x2a0 0x04> CRU_STRAPS_CTRL
>> reg = <0x2c0 0x04> PVTMON control0
>> (Broadcom never released a proper documentation)
>>
>>
>> As you can see there are a few CRU registers (depending on a source it's
>> a "Clock and Reset Unit" or "Central Resource Unit"). It's said to be
>> separated block and was described by Scott (from Broadcom) as: "unit
>> with a lot of random registers to perform various operations".
>>
>> As I said, there are also some shared registers:
>>
>> CRU_CLKSET_KEY is accessed by:
>> 1. USB 2.0 PHY driver for (un)locking DMU PLL settings
>> 2. GMAC for changing 2.66G line rate to 2Gbps
>>
>> CRU_STRAPS_CTRL needs to be accessed by:
>> 1. USB 3.0 PHY driver for PHY connected to MDIO
>> 2. PCIE driver for PHY connected to MDIO
>>
>>
>> My initial idea was to have something like:
>>
>> dmu@1800c000 {
>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>> ranges = <0 0x1800c000 0x1000>;
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>
>> cru@100 {
>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>> reg = <0x100 0x1a4>;
>>
>> lcpll { ... };
>> genpll { ... };
>> reset { ... };
>> };
>> };
>>
>> but Rob noticed that "simple-bus" requires everything in DMU to have
>> sub-nodes [0] [1].
>
> "simple-bus" apparently is a no-way as some single registers may need to
> be referenced using syscon.
>
>
>> I thought it can be solved by using compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"
>> and I even got one patch for that accepted [2] [3] (pinctrl). It seems
>> it slipped through and was possibly a mistake. Another similar patch was
>> rejected [4] [5] (bcm-ns-usb2-phy).
>>
>> What I tried to achieve was something like this:
>>
>> dmu@1800c000 {
>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>> ranges = <0 0x1800c000 0x1000>;
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>
>> cru: syscon@100 {
>> compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
This should actually be a simple-bus no?
>> reg = <0x100 0x1a4>;
>> ranges;
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>
>> lcpll0@0 {
>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>> compatible = "brcm,nsp-lcpll0";
>> reg = <0x0 0x14>;
>> };
>>
>> genpll@40 {
>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>> compatible = "brcm,nsp-genpll";
>> reg = <0x40 0x24>;
>> };
>>
>> pin-controller@c0 {
>> compatible = "brcm,bcm4708-pinmux";
>> reg = <0xc0 0x24>;
>> reg-names = "cru_gpio_control";
>> };
>>
>> thermal@1c0 {
>> compatible = "brcm,ns-thermal";
>> reg = <0x1c0 0x10>;
>> #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
>> };
>> };
>> };
>>
>> cru-reset@??? {
>> compatible = "brcm,ns-cru-reset";
>> syscon-cru = <&cru>; /* CRU_RESET */
>> #reset-cells = <1>;
>> };
>>
>> usb2-phy@??? {
>> compatible = "brcm,ns-usb2-phy";
>> syscon-cru = <&cru>; /* CRU_CLKSET_KEY */
>> #phy-cells = <0>;
>> };
>>
>> (apparently it wasn't a good idea)
>
> Here I tried "syscon", "simple-mfd" which lets me:
> 1. Have subnodes for all small hardware subblocks
> 2. Reference single registers using syscon
> but it appears I can't mix those two.
It does not seem to me that there is an use case for syscon except for
the USB2 PHY PLL which should arguably be a clock provider and the "DMP"
register base used by the USB 3.0 PHY which should be a reset provider.
--
Florian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-24 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 15:24 Proper DT bindings for Broadcom's DMU node Rafał Miłecki
2020-05-04 17:26 ` Ray Jui
2020-08-20 12:38 ` Rafał Miłecki
2020-08-24 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30fe8a8d-34a7-2138-a823-f508a8250039@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npcomplete13@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).