devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Maxime Ripard
	<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi
	<lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: firmware: psci: unify enable-method binding on ARM {64,32}-bit systems
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31757054.8aSO57qemx@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571F4632.6090003-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>

On Tuesday 26 April 2016 11:42:58 Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 22/04/16 16:18, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Currently ARM CPUs DT bindings allows different enable-method value for
> > PSCI based systems. On ARM 64-bit this property is required and must be
> > "psci" while on ARM 32-bit systems this property is optional and must
> > be "arm,psci" if present.
> >
> > However, "arm,psci" has always been the compatible string for the PSCI
> > node, and was never intended to be the enable-method. So this is a bug
> > in the binding and not a deliberate attempt at specifying 32-bit
> > differently.
> >
> > This is problematic if 32-bit OS is run on 64-bit system which has
> > "psci" as enable-method rather than the expected "arm,psci".
> >
> > So let's unify the value into "psci" and remove support for "arm,psci"
> > before it finds any users.
> >
> > Reported-by: Soby Mathew <Soby.Mathew-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 -
> >   drivers/firmware/psci.c                        | 2 +-
> >   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > v2->v1:
> >       - Added Mark and Lorenzo's ACKs
> >       - Updated commit message to specify that it also conflicts with
> >         PSCI compatible(from Mark's reply on the thread)
> >
> > Hi ARM-SoC guys,
> >
> > Can you please pick up this single fix for PSCI binding/driver for v4.6 ?
> >
> 
> Gentle ping to include this in next round of arm-soc fixes. It would be
> good to get this fixed before v4.6 as we don't want to have user of the
> binding which we want to remove in the release.
> 

Applied to the fixes branch. I have to admit that I don't understand
how the compatible string is really used here, so I have to trust that
this cannot break any existing machine.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-26 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-22 15:18 [PATCH v2] drivers: firmware: psci: unify enable-method binding on ARM {64,32}-bit systems Sudeep Holla
     [not found] ` <1461338282-19509-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-26 10:42   ` Sudeep Holla
     [not found]     ` <571F4632.6090003-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-26 10:49       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-04-26 11:01         ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-26 11:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 11:02         ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-26 11:02         ` [PATCH v2] drivers: firmware: psci: unify enable-method binding on ARM {64, 32}-bit systems Jisheng Zhang
2016-04-26 11:22           ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31757054.8aSO57qemx@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd-r2ngtmty4d4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khilman-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).