From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/22] of: add function to allow probing a device from a OF node Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:15:47 +0900 Message-ID: <31FFF416-BB40-4DC5-8CAF-8EF106FDD373@gmail.com> References: <1442844182-27787-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <10119606.2TraDKGPVy@vostro.rjw.lan> <8510008.IC14Fu2Aos@vostro.rjw.lan> <562BE562.8090704@kernel.org> <20151026001301.GT29919@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151026001301.GT29919@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown , Rob Herring Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tomeu Vizoso , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Javier Martinez Canillas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thierry Reding , Alan Stern , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Walleij , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On October 26, 2015 9:13:01 AM GMT+09:00, Mark Brown wrote: >On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Let's get agreement on the flow and structure and how to address >other >> issues like suspend, then we can worry about whether this needs to be >> abstracted from subsystems. We can discuss more this week at KS. > >Should we try to schedule an ad-hoc session today (Monday) for those of >us who are here to talk this over? That would be great. Thanks. -- Dmitry